Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Capitol No Smoking Bill Watered Down - Lawmakers can smoke in their offices
Channel Oklahoma ^

Posted on 04/01/2002 11:43:54 AM PST by chance33_98

Capitol No Smoking Bill Watered Down



Measure Amended To Allow It In Designated Areas

Posted: 12:08 p.m. CST April 1, 2002
Updated: 12:36 p.m. CST April 1, 2002

OKLAHOMA CITY -- Legislation that would make the state Capitol a "no smoking" area was amended by a House committee Monday to permit smoking in designated areas with proper ventilation.

The action by the House Commerce, Industry and Labor Committee was a setback for smoking opponents who want to ban smoking at the Capitol. Currently, lawmakers are allowed to smoke in their Capitol offices.

"There's no assurance that the Capitol will be any less smoky than it is right now," said Oklahoma's commissioner of health, Dr. Leslie M. Beitsch.

Rep. Kevin Calvey, R-Del City, said failure to ban smoking at the Capitol could lead to legal action against the Legislature for not making it safe for people with allergies or respiratory problems aggravated by secondhand smoke.

"We need to make this building, the people's building, smoke-free," Calvey said.

A bill by Sen. Ben Robinson, D-Muskogee, to ban smoking from the Capitol passed the Senate last month.

But the chairman of the House committee, Rep. Lloyd Fields, D-McAlester, amended it to allow smoking in designated areas.

Rep. Russ Roach, D-Tulsa, said that would allow lawmakers to continue smoking in their offices if they are designated as smoking areas.

"There is no separate ventilation currently," Roach said.

He amended Fields' amendment to require designated smoking areas to be equipped with ventilation systems that are separate from the main ventilation system at the Capitol.

Lawmakers' offices and other areas of the building where smoking is permitted are tied to the Capitol's main ventilation system, allowing secondhand smoke to spread throughout the building.

Without tough ventilation standards, Roach said the legislation would be merely "the illusion that we've done something."

The measure's co-author, Rep. Ray Vaughn, R-Edmond, said the bill is an improvement over existing smoking rules. But Beitsch said the amendments are an attempt to maintain the status quo for smokers.

"It is totally possible that we find ourselves where we are right now," he said.

Vaughn said he plans to amend the measure on the House floor to strengthen the ventilation requirements.

Vaughn said he had planned to present a substitute measure to the committee to ban smoking in all state government buildings, including the Capitol. But he said the idea had no support among committee members.

"Perhaps it was a little aggressive for this committee," Vaughn said.

Lawmakers offered no estimate of how much the new standards would cost. The Legislature has spent more than $46,000 on air purifiers during the last several years to help clear the Capitol's air of secondhand smoke.

The Board of Health has passed rules that would ban smoking in most public areas, including nursing homes and restaurants. But the rules may be rejected by the Legislature or the governor.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: pufflist
HMMMMMMM
1 posted on 04/01/2002 11:43:54 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Friggin' hypocrites. We ought to drug-test every elected official in this country, too. Might make them think twice about issues of 'privacy'.
2 posted on 04/01/2002 11:45:54 AM PST by zoyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98

3 posted on 04/01/2002 11:47:15 AM PST by Icthus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Capitol No Smoking Bill Watered Down - Lawmakers can smoke in their offices

Well how about that. One set of rules for the rulers, and another for us.

Never expected something like that to happen!

4 posted on 04/01/2002 11:48:04 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Lawmakers offered no estimate of how much the new standards would cost.

Not like they really care anyway. It's not coming out of their pockets.

5 posted on 04/01/2002 11:48:17 AM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Oh no, how awful!!

I'm terribly worried about their health and the costs to society, blah, blah, blah.

But wait (slapping forehead), of course. The little people are too stupid to manage their own lives and so must be directed from above. Naturally, there are exemptions for the oligarchs, superior strain that they are and all.

6 posted on 04/01/2002 12:45:26 PM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Why are we wasting or time on the legislators and public employees smoking. The true problem is most of the legislators and public employees ie: police, firemen, teachers, congressmen, senators, are in a private retirement plan, funded by investment and all these plans work very well. Cal PERS is a good example.

Private invested retirement plans can work for us too. This should be the the chalange, dont let the liberals continue to say private plans don't work, they do and very well.

LETS ALL TAKE UP THE CRY, OVER AND OVER AND OVER.

7 posted on 04/01/2002 1:25:51 PM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puff_list
Here's another one.
They are just not willing to outlaw it.
Wonder why?
8 posted on 04/01/2002 1:28:24 PM PST by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
One law for THEM, and another for the minions. TYPICAL.
9 posted on 04/01/2002 2:56:41 PM PST by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
The entirety of Washington DC prohibits smoking in office buildings. Period.

Except the Capitol.

I suppose I'll chime in, for what its worth.

Hypocrites.

10 posted on 04/01/2002 2:59:51 PM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Since I live in Oklahoma....Instead of asking questions of my ''representatives'', like, "How do you intend to cut the budget?" Or "What is your stance on the illegal alien problem in our state..?" I'm going to start asking my ''representatives''...( I use that term very loosely..) questions like this: "Do you currently, or have you ever smoked?" I expect alot of ''ducks and bucks''...LOL!!
11 posted on 04/01/2002 3:07:50 PM PST by Osage Orange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Well! I guess they are just going to have to go outdoors to smoke just like the rest of the workers in America who choose to smoke. If the lawmakers spend tax dollars to create smoking areas within the government building, then ALL businesses who have been forced to ban smoking in buildings should be required to create smoking areas inside too!!!!!!! What's good for the goose.........
12 posted on 04/01/2002 3:10:58 PM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeriegeno
Shame on you! Trying to bring logic to the pursuit of a smokefree world.... [/sarcasm]
13 posted on 04/02/2002 11:15:34 AM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson