Posted on 02/21/2003 11:07:52 PM PST by webber
Date: Thursday, February 20, 2003
Topic: Child Molestation
Summary: Several recent child molestation cases point to the need to protect our kids from homosexuals.
On February 13, 2003, a former Wisconsin Boy Scout leader was convicted of 20 counts of child sexual abuse and sentenced to 65 years in jail.
The judge said he wanted Gary Radloff to die behind bars for his crimes against children. Judge Patrick Haughney told Radloff: "Absent a serial killer, this case doesn't get any more serious because what we have here is a serial child molester. Mr. Radloff is evil. Mr Raloff is vile. He is a child molester who ran a house of evil. I intend this to be a life sentence."
Radloff had been convicted of child molestation in Illinois in the 1980s as a Boy Scout leader, but served only two years. He moved to Wisconsin and was charged last year with molesting three boys in his Scout troop.
In Visalia, California, a police officer and two other men (one who is HIV positive) have been arrested for molesting a 16-year-old boy they met in an American Online chat room called "Fresno Male for Males." The boy became concerned about being infected with AIDS after learning that one of his molesters, Aaron Rodriguez was HIV positive. After telling his mother, she contacted the police. The investigation of Rodriguez led detectives to the arrest of police officer Bryan Pinto and Justin Helt.
These homosexual molesters face up to five years in prison if convicted.
In Long Grove, Illinois, a prominent businessman was sentenced to six years in jail and ordered to pay $15 million to two boys he molested between 1995 and 1998.
Homosexual child molester Walter Metcalf was senior vice president at the Cole Taylor Bank in Wheeling, Il., and owned a pet supply store in Long Grove.
A male Milwaukee public school teacher has been arrested for dressing like a woman and trying to sexually molest a 15-year-old boy. James Simmons was charged with one count of child enticement and one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child.
Simmons told the boy that he was a transsexual and offered to pay him money to have oral sex with him.
After he made bail, he returned to teach in his elementary school classroom at Keefe Avenue Elementary School. School officials refused to tell reporters if Simmons would be removed from his teaching position.
Simmons has a police record of prostitution-related loitering and prowling in Milwaukee.
Here is where the propaganda starts (and write this one down freepers) the correct term here is not pedophilia, but PEDERASTY.
PEDERASTY, which can be looked up in the dictionary or medical dictionary, refers properly to the act of boy-raping by men, not unlike the recent Catholic Priest scandal.
When the homosexual lobby claims most acts of pedophilia are hetrosexual in nature, they are probably technically correct, but that of course excludes all acts of pederasty which are ALL HOMOSEXUAL IN NATURE.
The veiled words are to protect and promote homo-sexuality, nothing more and nothing less. I would hope that the majority of the posters see this gentleman for the fraud that he is.
First of all there is no such thing as a homosexual, despite the "conventional wisdom".
Males are males, and females are females, their sexual orientation (including any other perversion) is not genetically based.
There should never have been given a civil rights class to those individuals who choose to practice ACTS of homosexuality.
"They do it to themselves by their actions and their efforts to SHOVE their disease causing abnormal and psychologically damaging practices on the world."
Ah yes... the old "they bring it upon themselves" argument.
Well....yeah, pretty much.
Ok, "It's not what you do, it's who you're with." "If you woke up and it was dark ..." I get it.
So basically, every time a man smokes a cigar, he gay! So really its no big deal, it's just like eating a banana or going to the bathroom?
In fact, by your definition, child molesters aren't doing anything normal heterosexual adults don't do all the time -- it's just a question of the company you keep at the time.
Reproduction?
...except that they do it with members of the same sex.
Hence the perversion.
A big part of the reason you find more boys than girls being abused by priests is that girls are not left alone in the company of priests, generally. Altar BOYS are. I went to Catholic school.. and I don't recall ever being in a priest's company alone
Wrong! The reason is because the predatory PEDERASTS are hiding out in the clergy under the guise of the priesthood's ban on marriage.
The method of "reproduction" of the boy-raping-sodomites is recruitment. Once the impressionable developing youth have been confused and corrupted by the PEDERASTS, they may become the next generation of......well...
The name of the disorder in question is not "homosexuality", but the psychological term is actually GID!
GENDER IDENTITY DISORDER.
This one can also be looked up in your local medical reference book.
.....so off the bat I disagree with your phrasing of the question. Do I attribute my sexuality to my relationship with either of my parents? I really don't think so. But you might be on to something.. my parents also raised my 3 brothers, and all of them have girlfriends as well
Since a later post implies you to be female, question the first comment.....Not that I care.
As usual for the pro-homo side, you are using a straw man. I never said, never meant, and neither does anyone else mean or say, that ALL homosexuals are child molesters. BUT it is an uncontestable fact that AT LEAST 30 something to 40 something % of all child molestations are on boys by men, and homosexuals are a tiny minority of the population. It is also an UNCONTESTABLE FACT that "gay literature" abounds with stories and porn (is there a difference?) based on the seduction of youth by grown men, and the older man/very younger boy/young teen situation. If you deny this, you are consciously lying. "Greek love" and all that.
While I do accept your unsolicited comment as a sincere response to my observation and advise to our Milwaukee brothers and sisters (# 65) - a post specifically directed to each of them - yet unanswered - I would respectfully suggest you simply withdraw from commenting on this tread any further, and move on. Time heals all things, less another ill-considered comment slips from your pen and finds its way posted to a future FR thread.
"Pedophilia Chic" Reconsidered - The taboo against sex with children continues to erode
"This social consensus against the sexual exploitation of children and adolescents, however—unlike those against, say, animal sex or incest—is apparently eroding, and this regardless of the fact that the vast majority of citizens do overwhelmingly abominate the thing. For elsewhere in the public square, the defense of adult-child sex—more accurately, man-boy sex—is now out in the open. Moreover, it is on parade in a number of places—therapeutic, literary, and academic circles; mainstream publishing houses and journals and magazines and bookstores—where the mere appearance of such ideas would until recently have been not only unthinkable, but in many cases, subject to prosecution.
Four-plus years and many other challenges to the same taboo later, it is clear that this hypothesis got something wrong. For one thing, no sustained public challenges have arisen over other primal taboos. Even more telling, if nihilism and nihilism alone were the explanation for public attempts to legitimize sex with boy children, then we would expect the appearance of related attempts to legitimize sex with girl children; and these we manifestly do not see.2 Nobody, but nobody, has been allowed to make the case for girl pedophilia with the backing of any reputable institution. Publishing houses are not putting out acclaimed anthologies and works of fiction that include excerpts of men having sex with young girls. Psychologists and psychiatrists are not competing with each other to publish studies demonstrating that the sexual abuse of girls is inconsequential; or, indeed, that it ought not even be defined as "abuse."
Two examples from the last few weeks will suffice to show the double standard here..."
The funniest personal attack was the brouhaha about your moniker. HA!
Btw, I disagree with you on certain issues, but I applaud you for your graciousness and civility.
Often these "gay threads" are pulled for nasty name calling.
I haven't tried at all to change the subject. Just trying to illustrate that while I think what these men have done deserves the harshest punishments available, the subtext of this article is clearly that homosexuals in general are a problem, and it was written to reinforce that idea in peoples' heads.
For instance, if I wrote an article that gave the details of a number of black on white rapes and titled it "Black rapes continue", you would probably suspect my motives.
As for my choice of words... if I say 9/11 was a tragedy, will you take issue because what happened was a crime, pre-meditated, and not an accident? You're really reaching.
Your term is more correct, though. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.