Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Birth Certificate – Case Closed

Posted on 04/28/2011 1:57:39 AM PDT by TLittlefella

General Trump has accomplished what no others have managed in three years, the release
of Obama’s birth certificate. I do not see any incriminating information on Obama’s birth
certificate that would indicate he was not born in Hawaii. In fact the certificate is so
vanilla looking it leaves me with puzzling questions.
Why didn’t Obama release this certificate three years ago?
Why has Obama spent a considerable amount of money fighting the release of this
seemingly normal certificate?

Those unanswered questions will undoubtedly forever haunt many of us.

None the less, I now consider the case of his eligibility for the presidency to be closed.

Some people will go on forever scrutinizing the certificate, finding offset typing, layered
PDF information, etc., etc. It will all be a fools errand, a waste of time, and serve only to
discredit those who continue challenging the certificate’s authenticity.

There is only one piece of information (61 10641) on that certificate that would ever
make any difference and prove the certificate to be fraudulent. If someone proves that
certificate number belongs to someone else, then we have fraud, otherwise no matter what
other information may be errant it would not invalidate the authenticity of Obama’s
Hawaiian birth.

In spite of the media spin to claim Trump lost the battle over Obama’s birth certificate we
all know Trump won because he forced the certificate to be released. Not only did Trump
win, he completely made fools and liars out of those who claimed they had previously
authenticated Obama’s Hawaii birth. Fox used a two line newspaper announcement as
their investigative proof – so much for their investigative methods. CNN used the verbal
testimony of a couple of quacks claiming they remember seeing baby Obama in the
nursery – par for CNN’s biased reporting. And of course we have people like Rove who
claimed only the far right fringe had a concern for Obama’s birth place – we now know
nearly half of the American public had a concern.

Fox, CNN, Rove, and even Krauthammer tried to make a laughing stock out of the issue
and did their best to belittle Trump. They all owe Trump an apology and they all should
thank Trump for providing the proof that Obama is an American citizen.

Obama claimed Trump was a carnival barker, probably the only true statement Obama
has uttered in decades, Trump’s barking drew out the head clown from the white house
circus and in the clown’s hand was that elusive birth certificate.

Thomas Littlefella


TOPICS: Issues
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborn; obama; trump; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-157 next last
To: Gondring
This was GREAT for him. It kept people wasting their time looking at this issue instead of warning their fellow voters about all of the stuff he's doing.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Your statement above is speculation and pure **conspiracy theory**!

Afterbirthers living in the realm of fantasy and conjecture and, without even the most microscopic bit of evidence, fly off into the stratosphere of conspiracy thinking.

81 posted on 04/28/2011 5:02:38 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Miss G

To quote Joe Wilson....

“You lie!”

Now go back to Socialists Underground with your fellow commies.


82 posted on 04/28/2011 5:02:52 AM PDT by newfreep (Palin/West 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Miss G

Miss G: Since April 28, 2011


83 posted on 04/28/2011 5:05:56 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Miss G
Natural and native born both mean born in the US, not born of two US citizen parents.

I'm sorry, you are wrong about this. "Native born" simply refers to the place of one's "nativity", i.e., one's birth. "Natural born" refers to the circumstances of one's birth with respect to the parents' national loyalties and to what nation the child "naturally" owes its allegiance.

You are playing into Obama's hands by confusing the two. One of the reasons he felt safe in proferring the certificate released yesterday is that he feels the legal ground has been sufficiently clouded on this issue that he can spin his way out of it.

84 posted on 04/28/2011 5:09:31 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Napolean fries the idea powder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
One should be careful not to declare

too early.


85 posted on 04/28/2011 5:19:03 AM PDT by McGruff (When it comes to Obama's birth certificate. Trust, but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
The certificate proves he’s not a natural born citizen. But neither congress nor the senate nor the cowards of the GOP will act on it. The RINOS on our side are too timid to deserve to win.

The American people are superior to the Supreme Court. In 2008 the American people knew his father was Kenyan. They ruled by their votes that he was natural born. Accept that.

No, I don't like it either.

86 posted on 04/28/2011 5:22:06 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Democratic Underground: The Hogwarts of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1
The author of that video completely overlooks the obvious possibility that the lack of chromatic aberration in the White House version can be accounted for simply by the clerk photocopying the original on a copy machine printing from a paper tray with security paper.

I do not enough about PDF assembly features to comment on that attribute, or the apparent blurry difference in the security paper background.

Because of the name of the hospital on the purported birth certificate did not exist until 17 years after Bambi was born, I wonder when the document (or the abstract or reconstruction, or whatever it is) in the vital record book (assuming for a moment it is really there) was made.

Cordialy,

87 posted on 04/28/2011 5:23:35 AM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella

Oh, my heart be stilled! Finally, the arbiter of arbiters has spoken. The clouds have parted and he who knows all has descended to converse with us lowly folk. (I believe ‘littlefella’ means having a small manhood.) Well, at least now I can relax and know that our communist-in-chief never lies, never covers-up anything, and would never do anything criminal. Gee, what a relief. Thanks, littlefella! You have lifted the cloud of suspicion from our glorius dictator! Long may he now reign!


88 posted on 04/28/2011 5:24:26 AM PDT by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss G
Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson and James Buchanan were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. Their parentage nor their place of birth were relevant. They were grandfathered in by Article 2 Section 1.

Chester Arthur's qualifications were questioned but no one ever made the case in a court of law. Kind of like 0butthole so far.

Jessie Janet Woodrow, Woodrow Wilson's mother, came to America with her parents and was a naturalized American citizen.

Hulda Minthorn Hoover, Herbert Hoover's mother, moved with her family to the U.S. when she was 11 and was naturalized as an American citizen.

EPIC FAIL on all points, 0bot troll! LOL

89 posted on 04/28/2011 5:25:39 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka

You’re right, the American people are sovereign. And we can change our minds.


90 posted on 04/28/2011 5:27:58 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

...”It has nothing to do with Trump!”...

I am wondering whether Jerome Corsi’s book, WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE, which will be released on May 17, has something to do with it..I hear it has skyrocketed to #1 on Amazon.


91 posted on 04/28/2011 5:28:07 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: All

Someone tell me this....Is it not strange that Obama’s mother is listed as “Caucasian” under RACE on the birth certificate shown, yet his father is listed as “African”?

Since when is “African” a race? I thought Africa was a continent....In 1961, it would seem that “Negroid” would have been listed as race for the father...

I have heard no one bring this question forward...


92 posted on 04/28/2011 5:31:48 AM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

...”You accept the form to easily. The kid next door is 15 years old and wants to be a graphic artist. He is VERY good with all types of image programs. When I got home last night he came over and asked me what I thought of the cert 0 released. I told him I wasn’t sure yet. He looked me straight in the eye and said “It is a fake” and proceeded to list all the defects in the document.
The interesting part is that his parents were big 0 supporters. He lives in a house that is all about 0 all the time - and he still spotted all the errors in the document.

0 is a man on the run. All of the sudden Reid is demanding a vote on the Ryan budget. I do not believe in coincidences”...

Very interesting!


93 posted on 04/28/2011 5:32:41 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Miss G
“it is obvious from prior presidents’ parentage that this was the intent of the framers.”

First of all, there is a difference between “natural born” and “native born”, with the later simply meaning “born in the U.S.A..

The “natural born” qualifier doesn't mean that the presidential candidates parents had to be native born for their children to be “natural born”. They just have to have been “naturalized” citizens at the time of their child's birth.
When a person becomes a naturalized citizen, they sign a document renouncing their previous citizenship. They cannot retain dual allegiances to their former countries if they wish to become U.S. citizens.

Barry's father, according to the document he just released, was not a U.S. citizen, he was a British subject, and Barry was at a minimum also a dual citizenship status, and not “natural born”.

Further, Barry was also adopted by an Indonesian citizen, and attended school there, probably gaining a further muddied citizenship at that point.

94 posted on 04/28/2011 5:36:26 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (Proudly casting a heavy carbon footprint as I clean my guns ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
None the less, I now consider the case of his eligibility for the presidency to be closed.

"YOU" do?

In your Magisterial Pronouncement (from no doubt "On High") have proclained "Case Closed?"

Whoooop-dee-F'n-dooo!

Thanks for instructing all of us poor, ignorant, extremist, clingers (dare I suggest doubters?) that henceforth, NONE should deign to question anything else about this cuz YOU have so proclaimed.

Thanks, but no thanks "Wittle-Fella," but some of us are capable of thinking for ourselves and will continue to express our opinions and doubts, with or without your "Sanctioned Blessing!"

95 posted on 04/28/2011 5:36:26 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diamond
The author of that video completely overlooks the obvious possibility that the lack of chromatic aberration in the White House version can be accounted for simply by the clerk photocopying the original on a copy machine printing from a paper tray with security paper.

If that were true then the text would have had aberrations and the background wouldn't. Instead it is the opposite. Also the security background would have remained consistent throughout instead of blurring in the central block where all the text is and remaining clear around the edges.

96 posted on 04/28/2011 5:37:07 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella

“Where in the constitution does it define “natural born”?
That’s our dilemma.”

How about some supreme court cases?:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/


97 posted on 04/28/2011 5:46:40 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
"Where in the constitution does it define "natural born"? That's our dilemma. "

Where in the Constitution is any phrase "defined"?

The Constitution is not a dictionary.

98 posted on 04/28/2011 5:58:30 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
"....we should forget about the "natural born" requirement."

Why stop there? Why not just "forget" about the rest of the Constitution as well.

Did you even know that every elected official and military service member has sworn an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America?

99 posted on 04/28/2011 6:05:42 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
If that were true then the text would have had aberrations and the background wouldn't. Instead it is the opposite.

I'm not sure how to interpret your statement that "the text would have had aberrations". The author demonstrates that there are no chroma aberrations in the text of the White House version. If I am interpreting you correctly that the text would have aberrations if the original was photocopied on a copy machine printing from a paper tray with security paper, then my question is: why? Why would the text have aberrations if the original was photocopied on a copy machine printing from a paper tray with security paper?

I do agree that the inner segment of the security paper is blurred, but I cannot account for it.

Cordially,

100 posted on 04/28/2011 6:06:19 AM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson