"....?????....Huckawho?"
"....?????....Huckawho?"
this is a mega-analysis since 1980, repeat 1980.
To actually take this seriously, I need the formulas and a peer-review. I hate statistics, would have loved it when I was younger, but now know it is possible to say anything and only 25% of studies are replicable. Not that this falls into scientific categories.
did love the last line...” only the true fans of either give more than a rat’s tuchas.”
I wish people would be more critical of 538.
I agree it is interesting.
But the shaming processes that strip conservatives of favorabiltiy are controlled by anti conservative institutions. These same processes kept Reagan at bay for a long time.
Those processes must and can be confronted.
Like it or not, the elected public has never been more Republican.
In may respects, the electorate has never been more conservative than today.
There must be a revolt in 2016. It is all but inevitable.
But it begins by challenging the moderation thesis offered by anti-conservatives like 538.
Stupid article....Note that they LIE when they say they are reporting from 1980 to 2012. NO Reagan, no Carter, no H.W. Bush, no Obama.
Meaningless nonsense
LoG, thank you very much for this!
Ho hum. I wonder who the Whigs will nominate this time.