Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opinion: Women: At the political fringes no longer
The Pocono Record ^ | February 23, 2015 | Martha Burk

Posted on 02/23/2015 5:00:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

It’s that time of year and Americans are honoring some of our favorite presidents. How about honoring our female presidents this time around?

Oh, I forgot. There aren’t any.

Frankly, I find America’s two-centuries-and-counting streak of all-male presidents astounding. You’d think it was against the law to elect a woman. (It probably would have been if the founding fathers had even thought it could happen — it’s not like they let them vote or anything.)

And it’s not that women haven’t tried.

Most people don’t know about the first woman to run for our highest office. Victoria Woodhull gave it a shot, way back in 1872 — nearly 50 years before women even got the vote.

Undaunted by the fact that she was both disenfranchised and too young to legally become president, Woodhull traveled the country campaigning for two years before the election. Her speeches not only advocated women’s suffrage, but also birth control, “free love,” and other positions that were a century ahead of her time.

Alas, Woodhull and her sister spent Election Day in 1872 in jail.

Their crime? Publishing the facts about an adulterous affair between the very popular Reverend Henry Ward Beecher and a leader of the women’s movement, Elizabeth Tilton.

It was true yet politically incorrect. So the Woodhull sisters were indicted for libel and obscenity.

Since Woodhull’s mold-breaking effort, more than a dozen other women have run for president. The club is much more diverse than the guys who’ve been on the ballot.

In 1972, Patsy Mink was the first Japanese American to run (and the first woman of color to serve in Congress). Shirley Chisholm was the first of three prominent African American women to run. The other two were Lenora Fulani in 1988 and Senator Carol Moseley Braun in 2004.

And long before Mitt Romney came on the scene, fifth-generation Mormon Sonia Johnson was nominated by two minor parties in 1984. She became the first third-party candidate to qualify for primary matching funds.

A female candidate finally broke into the mainstream in 2008, when Hillary Clinton barely missed becoming the Democratic Party’s standard-bearer.

Now the former senator, secretary of state, and first lady is the presumed frontrunner.

Is the country finally ready for a female in the White House? Nobody knows. But if Clinton does run, she’ll be roughed up far more than the boy she’s up against, no matter which one of them it is.

How do I know? Because it’s already started, and she hasn’t even declared.

Naysayers claim Clinton is too old. Actually, she’s younger than Reagan was when he launched his first winning presidential bid.

Some critics wonder, could she stand to run and miss time with her grandchildren? Oh please.

Conservatives attack Clinton for being too liberal since she favors keeping abortion and birth control legal and accessible.

Progressives complain that she’s too conservative. Maybe they should try saying this 10 times: “President Ted Cruz.”

Others complain that she’s a rerun. Jeb Bush, anyone?

Rush Limbaugh lovers hold Clinton responsible for four U.S. deaths in the Benghazi attack. Why aren’t they more concerned about George W. Bush’s record? Some 2,356 Americans died in Afghanistan and 4,489 perished in Iraq.

No doubt Clinton will face more feeble charges, but you get the idea.

The country has come a long way since the 1870s. Unlike when Woodhull first ran, folks don’t find having a woman in charge of the nation an alien concept.

One thing’s for certain: If Hillary Clinton makes a run for it, she’ll win. Even if she doesn’t move back into the White House as president, she’ll succeed. Female candidates won’t be relegated to the fringe anymore after her campaign.

It’s the new normal. Get used to it if you’re not ready.

Who knows? 2016 could be a lucky number for the majority of voters — women.

*****

Martha Burk is the director of the Corporate Accountability Project for the National Council of Women’s Organizations (NCWO) and the author of the book Your Voice, Your Vote: The Savvy Woman’s Guide to Power, Politics, and the Change We Need. Follow Martha on twitter @MarthaBurk


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: bush; dnctalkingpoints; feminazism; hillary; hillary2016; tedcruz; waronwomenmeme; women
I just said "President Ted Cruz" 100 times and it sounded better each time.
1 posted on 02/23/2015 5:00:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ve been ready for a woman president for decades. I just don’t want that president to be Hillary Clinton.


2 posted on 02/23/2015 5:08:16 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Women have been voting for the most part and directing the country for the most part to socialism for decades by a large margin over men.


3 posted on 02/23/2015 5:12:46 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It was true yet politically incorrect. So the Woodhull sisters were indicted for libel and obscenity.

A libfem complaining about the injustice of political correctness?!?! ROFL - now there's a pot calling the kettle black!

Patsy Mink was the first Japanese American to run (and the first woman of color to serve in Congress).

I guess I'm really behind the times - had no idea that Americans of Asian descent were considered "of color" by the lefty crowd.

4 posted on 02/23/2015 5:19:13 PM PST by workerbee (The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Oh, I forgot. There aren’t any. Frankly, I find America’s two-centuries-and-counting streak of all-male presidents astounding."

In other words, this ditz is trying to shame us into voting for Hillary or Elizabeth. But it should be pointed out that among the two or three hundred million men in the history of this country, only about forty-five have ever been elected president. It's not as if being president is every man's destiny or birthright.

And "astounding"? Give me a break. Out of probably 50-80 million Catholic men in the history of this country, only one has been president. Presidents are rare birds.
5 posted on 02/23/2015 5:24:57 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

I’d vote for Susana Martinez.


6 posted on 02/23/2015 5:25:49 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

How many women have actually run for president? I am pretty sure the author did his best to pillory Michelle Bachman last time around...and I am sure he would love to see a Sarah Palin.


7 posted on 02/23/2015 6:01:01 PM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%ij)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Conservatives attack Clinton for being too liberal since she favors keeping abortion and birth control legal and accessible.

It's all about the lady parts, isn't it?

Nothing about sleeping her way to power. Nothing about being the architect of Hillarycare (which came before Romneycare and Obamacare). Nothing about about her "reset" on foreign policy with the Russians (looks like steps backwards, not forwards). Nothing about her statements against more of your money in your pocket "you are just gonna waste it anyhow".

Ask the lady who wrote this to consider Sarah Palin for president.

She can stuff this DNC puff piece up her rump.

8 posted on 02/23/2015 6:10:09 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Whoa, that's just about every woman who's ever run for a senior Executive office, isn't it? Well, Geraldine Ferraro ran for Vice President, I suppose. What a pity the Republicans have never run a woman candidate for any office like that.

Anyone notice anybody missing from this list? Oh, yeah, there was that Palin person, wasn't there? But she's not a real woman, only had five kids and stuff...

Tired of the NOW hypocrisy. They're irrelevant, and this is only one reason.

9 posted on 02/23/2015 6:15:32 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Women have been running the country since the 1930’s. They just keep changing their minds.


10 posted on 02/23/2015 6:35:14 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

From the Oscars to the daily news... The talking points have been issued. Its all about women, all the time. All for the sole purpose of ensuring a person with a vagina is elected as potus in 2016.

Notice how “women’s issues” are brought up ad infinitum from now until then. It’s all about getting godzhillary into the White House.


11 posted on 02/23/2015 6:58:08 PM PST by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson