Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boxer holds slim edge as '04 Senate race nears
Sacramento Bee ^ | 10/17/03 | Robert D. Dávila

Posted on 10/17/2003 5:19:29 AM PDT by BlackRazor

Edited on 04/12/2004 6:00:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Democrat Barbara Boxer maintains a small plurality of support for re-election to the U.S. Senate and leads four potential Republican challengers as attention shifts toward next year's statewide elections, according to a poll released Thursday.

Forty-five percent of all registered voters surveyed by the Field Poll said they were inclined to re-elect Boxer to a third six-year term in November 2004, while 40 percent were not inclined and 15 percent had no opinion. The numbers have changed little since July, when 48 percent were inclined to re-elect Boxer, 41 percent were not and 11 percent had no opinion.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2004; boxer; california; catrans; electionussenate; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2003 5:19:29 AM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coop
45% re-elect. Hardly inspiring numbers for Boxer. Do you know how that compares to previous campaigns? Her adviser says these are her best numbers ever!
2 posted on 10/17/2003 5:21:24 AM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: William Creel
No, Mr. Behr, it shows that people find her to be a meanhearted bitch.:)

LOL If Rush calls Nancy Pelosi 'Miss America' I wonder what name he has for this one?

4 posted on 10/17/2003 5:24:02 AM PDT by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
Wow! All California Republicans need is another popular RINO movie start to run and they should have it all wrapped up... After all, a pseudo-Republican is better than no republican, isn't it?
5 posted on 10/17/2003 5:25:46 AM PDT by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
What is it about women named Barbara (or variations thereof), anyway? About 9/10ths of them are nothing but woman-shaped spawn of Satan.
6 posted on 10/17/2003 5:26:22 AM PDT by FierceDraka ("I AM NOT A NUMBER - I AM A FREE MAN!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
Come on, this is Cali, and its a year from the election. Gray won re-election with under 50% as well....

Believe me I hate Boxer, but a year out in Cali, these numbers don't mean didly.... the interesting thing to watch will be what Republican canidate gets the nod... will it be someone who will attract outside the party core, or will Cali R's go right back to their old failed pattern of putting up loser for general election.
7 posted on 10/17/2003 5:29:07 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
After all, a pseudo-Republican is better than no republican, isn't it?

Compared to Barbara Boxer? Yes.

8 posted on 10/17/2003 5:29:26 AM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
Boxer is as dumb as a mud fence. If it wasn't for Washington's Patti Murray, she would win the title of dumbest senator hands down. My favorite to take her on would be Condi Rice. It would be like Einstein debating a street walker.
9 posted on 10/17/2003 5:38:13 AM PDT by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Hey, don't forget Sheila Jackson Lee as the leader of the pack of dummies.
10 posted on 10/17/2003 5:45:19 AM PDT by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
You know, it's too bad that people don't actually look at the candidates. For example, how really unique President Bush is.

It's all about innuendo and lies.
11 posted on 10/17/2003 5:47:16 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
If this were Bush, the headline would be "Bush numbers plummeting, re-election unlikely."
12 posted on 10/17/2003 5:50:50 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
Do you know how that compares to previous campaigns?

Negative. Didn't track the numbers back then, and I'm too lazy to look them up. :-)

13 posted on 10/17/2003 5:51:28 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
The last three Field polls show her re-elect numbers at 45%, 48% and 46%. It's safe to say she doesn't exactly have momentum right now. :-)
14 posted on 10/17/2003 6:03:05 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
Imagine for a moment that these stats were Bush's stats. Does anyone think the headline would read Bush holds slim edge as '04 race nears ?
15 posted on 10/17/2003 6:55:23 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
She's beatable, but just barely. It's still a likely hold.
16 posted on 10/17/2003 7:07:08 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Boxer favored by 45% in poll (Field Poll alert)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-campaign2002/1002900/posts

Cross-linking.

17 posted on 10/17/2003 7:19:58 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (RED SOX WIN! We had 'em all the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
will it be someone who will attract outside the party core, or will Cali R's go right back to their old failed pattern of putting up loser for general election.

Matt Fong attracted support outside the party's core. He was tied with Babs before she unleashed her TV attacks with 2? weeks left that he didn't have the $ to counter. Fong with more $ and a better GOP year would have won.

18 posted on 10/17/2003 7:24:16 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (RED SOX WIN! We had 'em all the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
ANY RINO IS BETTER THAN THE BEST RAT ANY DAY!!!!!!!!!
Let the Cal GOP put up another Rino. Does anyone think he/she could be worse?
Besides, we are NOT going to win that seat anyway but; giving her a good fight will keep her and her rat scum money home so she can't give it to other rats in close races. THAT JUST ANOTHER ADVANTAGE OF ELECTING EVEN a rino like Arnold.
19 posted on 10/17/2003 7:37:05 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson