DEMS GRIPE THAT HILLARY IS STEALING THUNDER

New York Post ^ | 10/20/03 | DEBORAH ORIN

[kattracks]

October 20, 2003 -- Some Democrats are grumping about the fact that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is taking the spotlight at a big political dinner in the key state of Iowa next month, when the 2004 Democratic contenders will be onstage. Clinton (D-N.Y.), who insists she won't run in 2004, has been tapped as master of ceremonies, tasked with introducing and praising each of the rivals at the Iowa Democratic Party's Jefferson-Jackson dinner on Nov. 15.

[Joe Boucher]

Bill and Hill just can't let anyone in the dim party get close to being as big as they are. They will do whatever is necessary to keep the spot light on them.
Great to see as so far they have led that liberal stupid party to near ruin.
Hell, a few more elections with their lead and the help of Mcawful and the dim party might just close up shop.
And her delusional highness still thinks she is electable to national office? She isn't worthy to clean up my dogs stools.

[Caipirabob]

DEMS GRIPE THAT HILLARY IS STEALING THUNDER...

Apparently they haven't checked their silverware yet.

[Penny]

kattracks, I say "right on"!!! The whiners are getting what they deserve because had the dumdem party taken a principled stand against the immoral leaders (the clintons) of their party in particular and the corrupting and obstructionist practices of their party in general, they wouldn't have low poll numbers and prevailing disrespect from the majority of American voters.

So long as the 12 candidates and all the other clinton sycophants keep fanning the publicity flames around the clintons, exposing them fully in all their slimy worthlessness (unwittingly, perhaps), then we conservatives will survive all their lies and manipulative revisionisms for decades to come.

Best as always,
Penny

[PBRSTREETGANG]

They don't call her

for nothing.

[kipj]

You got to just love this. As long as the clinton's hog the spotlight and represent rat leadership at the highest level the demo party will continue to slide to oblivion . . . and yet, they are just too stupid to figure that out.

[putupon]

ARRGH!, you already had it posted. Just for that I'm going to post this:

[gulfcoast6]

IF I were a democract canidate the LAST thing I would want is for one of the clintons to endorse me.

Of course they are trying to steal the thunder, what would one expect knowing them.

[raybbr]

These dumb dems have been broken. They have been wearing these for so long they don't even know it anymore.

[Just mythoughts]

Now we know why bjclinton stood out there in those fields in Iowa, he was setting up a good deal for hillary.

Hillary is not running she has filled out her DRAFT papers.

Finally a clinton that will be DRAFTED.

[Ronin]

I wonder what the kind of destruct device the Clintons have on Clarke. You have to know they have something. He is and has been their creation.

Something like a range safety package. He gets too big, or starts getting too close to actually winning and it's...

ZAP!!!

[chiefqc]

The only things big about crusty are:

Her mouth, her butt, her ankles, her legs, her belly and her self professed ego.

[IronJack]

Why not? SHe's stolen everything else.

[Dutch Boy]

I wonder what the kind of destruct device the Clintons have on Clarke.

It's his mouth. Clark's own words will be his undoing. He is only there to hurt Dean. There is no way the Clinton team didn't know about the videos praising Bush. It's in the public record. This would be a rookie mistake of gigantic proportions if they didn't know.

[Piquaboy]

This is an indication as to just how stupid they are. I cannot believe that it took them this long to figure it out.

[Grampa Dave]

Below is the response of those wanting be to the Rat Candidate for 2004 to this news:

[randita]

"She ought to know better. If she's not going to run, she ought to give some air to the people who really are. Why doesn't she do a JJ [Jefferson-Jackson dinner] in Florida?" said a Democratic activist who likes Clinton but thinks she's getting in the way.

Why do these critics of the Clintons always go unnamed? What are they afraid of? Except for Susan Estrich, almost no Democrats will ever lend their names to a criticism of the Clintons.

[jetson]

To steal a famous quote " WHO IS SHE AND WHAT IS SHE DOING HERE?

[semiarticulate]

"DEMS GRIPE THAT HILLARY IS STEALING THUNDER..."

With Dean, Clark, Gephart, et al you really can't call it grand larceny.

[Verginius Rufus]

Why are Democrats still holding Jefferson-Jackson Dinners? Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were slaveholders, which outweighs anything positive they might have done. Or are the dinners in honor of George Jefferson and Jesse Jackson?