Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 technologies that deserve to die (Go at it)
MSN/Technology Review ^ | 24 Oct 03 | Bruce Sterling

Posted on 10/24/2003 11:34:45 AM PDT by RussianConservative

A science fiction writer's irreverent take.

1. NUCLEAR WEAPONS

ONE CAN make some sound arguments for nuclear power-medical radioisotopes are quite handy, while far-traveling spacecraft can barely function on anything less-but there is no reason for us to go on pretending that we need to fry entire chunks of continents. Not only are nuclear weapons technically clumsy, but they betray a blatant death wish better suited to al-Qaeda than a civilization.

Nowadays, a well-organized state can deftly obliterate any conceivable target with exquisite GPS accuracy. Conventional "daisy cutters" and cluster bombs can be scaled up to any size or potency that the military might need. This leaves nuclear bombs with only one ideal function: terrorism. They are excellent weapons for nongovernmental predators to deploy against centers of government. They are quite useless for governments to deploy against terrorists. So why are governments still manufacturing these expensive, dangerous, easily stolen objects?

If all nuclear weapons vanished tomorrow, the world's current military situation would not be affected one whit. The U.S.A. would still be military top boss. Yet we'd be much less likely to wake up one morning to find Paris or Washington missing.

2. COAL-BASED POWER

COAL ISN'T so much a "technology" as a whole school of them, all of them bad or worse. Coal was the primeval fuel of the industrial revolution. Coal powered the first steam engines, whose killer app was pumping stagnant water out of coal mines. It powered the railroads, whose killer app was moving coal.

Unfortunately, we've been doing this coal trick for some two hundred years now, and coal is getting uglier by the day. If your accountants rival Enron's, you can claim that coal is a cheap fuel. Add in acid rain, climate damage, and medical costs, and it swiftly becomes dead obvious that coal is a menace. Coal spews more weather- wrecking pollutants into the air per unit of energy than any other fossil fuel. Extracting coal destroys vast tracts of land. Coal mining is one of the world's most dangerous jobs.

If coal vanished tomorrow, we'd miss it: the U.S. would lose a quarter of its energy supplies. But that shortfall, daunting though it is, cannot compare to the ghastly prospect of blackened skies over China and seas rising out of their beds. The sooner we rid ourselves of this destructive addiction, the less we will have to regret.

3. THE INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINE

I HAVE to confess that, as a former denizen of the 20th century, I'll miss the loud, soul-stirring THRAAAAGH of a two-stroke motorcycle. And liter for liter, calorie for calorie, gasoline is truly the queen of liquid fuels. Nevertheless, if you stand inside a closed garage with any internal-combustion engine, it will kill you. That is bad. Even the best such engines emit an eye-watering stink.

Internal-combustion engines are big and clumsy. They are hard to tune, and they waste a lot of effort carrying their own weight. They've got a great incumbent fueling system built into place, but they need to be replaced by hydrogen and fuel cells, technologies that are simpler, safer, and cleaner. If you need really loud, macho engine noises, why not just record them and play them on your car stereo?

4. INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULBS

IN REALITY, these sad devices are "heat bulbs." Supposedly a lighting technology, they produce nine times more raw heat than they do illumination. The light they do give, admittedly, is still prettier than the eerie glow of compact fluorescents and light- emitting diodes. But it's still a far cry from the glories of natural daylight.

Plus there's the cost of light bulbs, their fragility, the replacement overhead, the vast waste of energy, glass, and tungsten, the goofy hassle of running air conditioners to do battle with the blazing heat of all these round little glass stoves...let's face it, these gizmos deserve to vanish.

They will be replaced by a superior technology, something cheap, cool, and precisely engineered, that emits visible wavelengths genuinely suited to a consumer's human eyeball. Our descendants will stare at those vacuum-shrouded wires as if they were whale-oil lanterns.

5. LAND MINES

THE PLANET is already cluttered with well-meaning nongovernmental organizations protesting land mines. Their plaint makes perfect sense when you realize that land mines are ideally suited to blowing up peacemakers once a war is over.

During a war, few soldiers step on land mines, because mines are placed by enemies waiting with rifles. Once the armies demob, though, and armies always do, land mines don't kill combatants anymore. They kill livestock, the brighter and more exploratory kinds of children, and the men and women who wander around after soldiers, attempting to restore the planet to habitability.

There is something to be said for the practice of automating bombs so that people can get killed without any human intervention. After all, there's a long technical trend there, and it strongly favors advanced societies with engineers over those among us who merely pick up hoes and axes in fits of tribal rage. But it's stupid to manufacture and spread lethal devices that don't know when a war is over.

6. MANNED SPACEFLIGHT

ONE HATES to see this dazzling technology go, but when one resolutely sets the romance aside, there's not a lot left. Thanks to decades of biological research, it's now quite clear that flying around the solar system is bad for one's health. Without the healthy stresses of gravity on one's skeleton, human bones decay just as they do during prolonged bed rest while muscles atrophy. Cosmic rays blast through spacecraft walls and human bodies, while solar flares will fry astronauts as diligently as any nuclear bomb. I won't mention the fact that spacecraft are inherently rickety and dangerous, because that's a major part of their attraction.

There is little point in stepping onto the moon, leaving flags and footprints, and then retreating once again. The staggering price of shipping a kilogram into orbit has not come down in decades. In the meantime, unmanned spacecraft grow smaller and more capable every year. Until we bioengineer ourselves to enjoy cosmic rays, or until we've got rockets that can lift a Winnebago made of solid lead, this technology belongs on the museum shelf.

7. PRISONS

IT'S RATHER out of style to suggest that people who transgress might be rehabilitated if treated decently. But even if criminals are to be relentlessly punished, removed from the sight of decent people, and kept in a giant, two-million-person ghetto, there are better, cheaper, and more efficient ways than the ones we have.

Newfangled electronic-parole monitors and ubiquitous computing offer plenty of opportunities. These certainly needn't be seen as sissified kinds of constraints; they could be just as cruel and unusual as anyone might like.

Lose your American internal visa (formerly known as a "driver's license") and you soon find that merchants won't take your credit, that aircraft won't transport you, that for all your sunny smiles and good behavior, you are under heavy constraints. American airports have become incarceration centers in all but name, plus you can get a drink there and listen to Muzak. So why do we go through these same ritual gestures with the iron bars, uniforms, and transport trucks? Technically, it's redundant.

8. COSMETIC IMPLANTS

THERE IS something scarily aberrant about puffing up living human flesh by implanting large amounts of an alien substance. Not that people will sacrifice vanity-of course that is out of the question- but any truly advanced medical technology would simply grow the flesh into the desired shape, using the human metabolism, as opposed to injections of window putty. Silicone's mimicry of flesh-and the same goes for gel, saline, and collagen-is too crude for genuinely cosmetic purposes.

9. LIE DETECTORS

THEY JUST plain don't work. They might have some vague use in increasing the psychological stress of a subject under interrogation, but galvanic skin response and heart rate have little to do with the process of lying. The use of lie detectors is basically a voodoo ritual that allows large institutions to lie to themselves about the trustworthiness of their employees.

Even if lie detectors did work-say, with newfangled nuclear magnetic-resonance brain scans-they would become an Orwellian intrusion. Furthermore, there would likely be a social revolution as major actors in society, from top to bottom, had to admit to fabricating their lives out of spin and wishful thinking. The official public version of our means, motives, and opportunities is severely divorced from the private world of our interior thoughts. If we were forced to confront and reveal our brain functions through technological means, most of us would soon discover that we led half- baked lives of quiet intellectual desperation, in which very little th\ought of any kind ever took place.

10. DVDs

THE DVD was the most eagerly adopted electronic consumer gizmo in history, but I'd feel bad if I failed to complain about the evil of these things. First and worst, DVDs are unbearably frail. Any benefit one gets from "clearer pictures"-on what HDTV superscreen, exactly?-is quickly removed by the catastrophic effects of a single thumbprint or scratch. Plus, just like CDs, DVDs as physical objects will prove to warp and delaminate.

Most loathsome of all is the fiendish spam hard-burned into DVDs, which forces one to suffer through the commercials gratefully evaded by videotape fast-forwards. The Content Scrambling System copy protection scheme doesn't work, and the payoff for pirating DVDs is massive, because unlike tapes, digital data don't degrade with reproduction. So DVDs have the downside of piracy and organized crime, without the upside of free, simple distribution. Someday they will stand starkly revealed for what they really are: collateral damage to consumers in the entertainment industry's miserable, endless war of attrition with digital media.

TECHNOLOGIES DIE rather routinely-seen a Conestoga covered wagon lately?-but it's rare for them to be singled out and righteously put to death. Some technologies, however, are so blatantly obnoxious that the human race would rejoice if they were obliterated. A wise society would honor its young technical innovators for services rendered in annihilating obsolete technologies that are the dangerous hangovers of previous, less advanced generations.

Bruce Sterling is a science fiction author, journalist, and cultural critic based in Austin, Texas. He is the author of "The Hacker Crackdown" and other books, and his articles have appeared in Wired magazine, The New York Times, The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction and other publications.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: misc; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

1 posted on 10/24/2003 11:34:45 AM PDT by RussianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
It appears that Mr. Sterling has a bit of an agenda, eh?
2 posted on 10/24/2003 11:37:07 AM PDT by AngryJawa ("The bang is great, but the shockwave is where it’s at.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
11. Traffic-monitoring cameras that automatically ticket motorists.
3 posted on 10/24/2003 11:37:28 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (I brake for taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Imagine...all the people....woowoo...
4 posted on 10/24/2003 11:39:03 AM PDT by eniapmot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
I vote for fax machines.
5 posted on 10/24/2003 11:39:29 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Where to start?

Nuclear weapons. There ultimate utility may be as a means of protecting the planet from a rouge space object.

Prisons rehabilitation does not work and we are unwilling to execute peopel for attempted murder and theft etc.
6 posted on 10/24/2003 11:39:44 AM PDT by harpseal (stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
And I'm sure Mr. Sterling would keep a few of these (or their benefits), while denying them to everyone else.
7 posted on 10/24/2003 11:39:57 AM PDT by Guillermo ( Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
E-spam, pop-up ads, telemarketing.
8 posted on 10/24/2003 11:40:01 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (I brake for taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Geeze........maybe this guy should move to some jungle or something. He certainly doesn't like living on MY planet.
9 posted on 10/24/2003 11:40:07 AM PDT by EggsAckley (..........................God Bless and Keep Terri.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Bruce Sterling is a science fiction author, journalist, and cultural critic based in Austin, Texas.

Also complete idiot.
10 posted on 10/24/2003 11:40:22 AM PDT by tet68 (multiculturalism is an ideological academic fantasy maintained in obvious bad faith. M. Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Light bulbs and cosmetic implants sort of make sense.

The rest were just that guy's rant.

A liberal rant.
11 posted on 10/24/2003 11:40:27 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
This guy sounds like a Unabomber-in-Training.
12 posted on 10/24/2003 11:41:48 AM PDT by TonyInOhio (Win The War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
11. Technology writers who pander to the world's lefist notions of feel-good suggestions without offering real-world solutions instead.
13 posted on 10/24/2003 11:42:04 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Sterling appears to be what I would call a watermelon. Green on the outside, red on the inside.
14 posted on 10/24/2003 11:42:10 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (I got hemoglobin, you got hemoglobin, all God's children got hemoglobin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Those green boards behind home plate that have advertisements electronically displayed on them. You can't watch the pitcher-batter shot without seeing the ad.
15 posted on 10/24/2003 11:42:14 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (I brake for taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Not to get in on his agenda, but he does have a point with coal based power, the internal combustion engine and lightbulbs...this is old technology, and I can see how a techie would poo-poo such old technology. In fact, it is rather suprising that we still place so much reliance on such old technology.
16 posted on 10/24/2003 11:42:23 AM PDT by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: tet68
Bruce Sterling

Is he wearing a mullet? That should give you some idea of his mind set.

18 posted on 10/24/2003 11:45:03 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt
Yeah, and man we need to get rid of the wheel too. Talk about old technology! And don't even get me started on fire!
19 posted on 10/24/2003 11:45:11 AM PDT by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
As an MIT alum, I'm embarrassed that a magazine with any ties to my alma mater would publish this crap. (Not that MIT was ever particularly conservative, but it still galls me.) This guy is the poster child for the old baby/bathwater axiom.
20 posted on 10/24/2003 11:46:03 AM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson