Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Universal National Service Act of 2003
self

Posted on 11/12/2003 9:49:33 AM PST by hsmomx3

Anyone hear about this?

"The Universal National Service Act of 2003 "amends the Military Selective Service Act to authorize the military registration of females" and declares "that it is the obligation of every U.S. citizen, and every other person residing in the United States, between the ages of 18 and 26 to perform a two-year period of national service"


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: draft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-235 next last
To: freeeee
Gaining of constitutional knowledge? That's kind of funny considering how very clear they make it that once you're in the military, the Constitution no longer applies to you.

Lest we forgot what happened in the last Presidential where Gore's lawyers was able to throw out ALL the military abbesitee ballots in FL.

I see the democratic logic in this, draft all the young conservatives, send them to die in the most hellish places on Earth, stripping them of the right to free speech, to right to vote, the right to their pursuit of happiness (their future), taxing them to the point of bankrupcy, while at the same time, giving illegal immigrants free health care, free walfare and the right to vote democratic.

As the U.S. where being a citizen means being second class to everyone else.

Personally, I think a revolt will happen probably in 2 to 8 years, depends on who wins next year's presidential election.

61 posted on 11/12/2003 11:49:24 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
In see nothing wrong with a draft/service obligation [with absolutely no deferments] for say a term of one year with a 'no combat clause'..
Call it a citizens duty, a 'rite of passage', -- whatever... But this country needs people 'indoctrinated' in constitutional knowledge and self defense.
37 -tpaine-




freeeee wrote:
Gaining of constitutional knowledge? That's kind of funny considering how very clear they make it that once you're in the military, the Constitution no longer applies to you. I object to the notion that the government should be indoctrinating anyone.





You take an oath to protect and defend our constitution, not that "the Constitution no longer applies to you".

Obviously, ~you~ are one of those that could best benefit from some army courses on legal/illegal orders, logic & ethics..
62 posted on 11/12/2003 11:49:41 AM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Rickenbacker in me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
It takes a real special case to equate being savagely attacked by islamofascist terrorists with dopey campaign finance laws.

I'm just pointing out who's taking freedom from you. If you urge people to fight for freedom, someone eventually is going to think it through.

63 posted on 11/12/2003 11:50:11 AM PST by freeeee (I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Translation: You're a weakling and will come up with the most tenuous reasons for rationalizing your failures and fears.
64 posted on 11/12/2003 11:51:18 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (The LMDC can go to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AndyObermann
But, there was no "draft", as we commonly refer to it, before before 1948 and it ended in 1973.

There are half a million dead Civil War Soldiers and several million from WWI and WWII who would take issue with your point.

65 posted on 11/12/2003 11:51:33 AM PST by CholeraJoe (That others may live)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
I care so much about freedom that I was willing to defend it with my life.

My thanks for your service.

66 posted on 11/12/2003 11:51:51 AM PST by freeeee (I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Guess I'm just going to have to disagree with you all on this one. However, NO, NYC, I am no 'metrosexual' lol. I'm bald...and I almost always wear t-shirts and jeans...ummm, no I just don't believe I qualify for that honor lol.
67 posted on 11/12/2003 11:54:02 AM PST by AndyObermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
But we shouldn't hate our country.

IMHO...hating our country and having a disdain for our government are 2 very different things.

68 posted on 11/12/2003 11:54:06 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (if we're not going to act like a constitutional republic...lets be the best empire we can be...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
Nah, I object to hypocrites who like to pontificate about "fighting for our rights," but run away as soon as it's time to put up.

And I detest hypocrites like you. I take it from your name that you are female and therefore currently NOT subject to the draft.

I find it sicking that people like you who want to pass laws that force people like me and 'freee' to fight and die while at the same time having these law not apply to YOU!!

Perhaps it's time you put up or shut up.

69 posted on 11/12/2003 11:55:31 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
You're welcome. It runs in the family.
70 posted on 11/12/2003 11:55:39 AM PST by CholeraJoe (That others may live)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
Insults instead of ideas.
71 posted on 11/12/2003 11:55:44 AM PST by freeeee (I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: AndyObermann
However, NO, NYC, I am no 'metrosexual' lol. I'm bald...and I almost always wear t-shirts and jeans...ummm, no I just don't believe I qualify for that honor lol.

You've taped each and every episode of Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, haven't you?

72 posted on 11/12/2003 11:57:22 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (The LMDC can go to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup; NYC GOP Chick
Paul, you have a point there.

Miss Chick, when did you serve?

73 posted on 11/12/2003 11:57:49 AM PST by freeeee (I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
No, I don't believe those people were drafted... Directly from the Selective Services Website:

"For more than 50 years, Selective Service and the registration requirement for America's young men have served as a backup system to provide manpower to the U.S. Armed Forces.

President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 which created the country's first peacetime draft and formally established the Selective Service System as an independent Federal agency.

From 1948 until 1973, during both peacetime and periods of conflict, men were drafted to fill vacancies in the armed forces which could not be filled through voluntary means.

In 1973, the draft ended and the U.S. converted to an All-Volunteer military.

74 posted on 11/12/2003 11:58:27 AM PST by AndyObermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
U.S. Constitution: Thirteenth Amendment - Slavery And Involuntary Servitude
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Explain how you justify a compulsary military/national-service draft as Constitutional.

75 posted on 11/12/2003 11:58:31 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Actually, the law would apply to both men *and* women -- although I do believe that hysterical ninnies who throw hissy fits should be exempted.
76 posted on 11/12/2003 11:58:49 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (The LMDC can go to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus
Agreed.
77 posted on 11/12/2003 11:59:02 AM PST by freeeee (I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
No, I've never had the chance to view the program lol. It...ya, that's a strange one (show) lol.
78 posted on 11/12/2003 11:59:28 AM PST by AndyObermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
I didn't serve -- but I would have done so proudly if called upon by my country. And I reckon I'd have been a "better man" about it than many of you wusses on this thread. I sure as hell wouldn't have whined and wimpered about it.
79 posted on 11/12/2003 12:00:39 PM PST by NYC GOP Chick (The LMDC can go to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Well, for one thing, I don't consider it to be slavery or involuntary servitude. I'd consider it an honor.
80 posted on 11/12/2003 12:01:38 PM PST by NYC GOP Chick (The LMDC can go to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson