Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whites and the Next Racial Clash in America
Time ^ | 12/05/03 | JACK E. WHITE

Posted on 12/05/2003 5:44:11 PM PST by freedom44

According to political scientist Carol M. Swain's unsettling new book, "The New White Nationalism in America: Its Challenge to Integration," the U.S. is on the brink of an explosion of white "tribalism" that could trigger unprecedented levels of racial antagonism and an epidemic of violence. The underlying cause: a swelling "white nationalist" movement fueled by simmering resentment of affirmative action programs like those used by the University of Michigan. "The book is a wake-up call to warn people that we're following a dangerous course by pushing identity politics and multi-culturalism," explains the Vanderbilt law school professor. "There's nothing special about the U.S. that says we couldn't have ethnic cleansing and violence here like in Bosnia or Rwanda."

It's shocking to hear such a dire prophesy from a scholar like Swain, who is rapidly establishing herself as one of the leaders of a new, increasingly vocal neoconservative brand of black political analysis that rejects affirmative action and reparations for slavery and holds blacks responsible for their own uplift. Until recently, most left-leaning black theorists derided her as a hopeless optimist. Her previous book, "Black Faces, Black Interests," ruffled many black politicians by dismissing their fear that a Supreme Court ruling that struck down the use of race in the creation of majority black congressional districts would be a disaster. Instead, Swain predicted, the ruling actually would be good for African Americans. As she foresaw, even in the Deep South strong black candidates were capable of winning enough support from whites to prevail in districts where black voters were outnumbered. She also argued that disbursing blacks into mostly-white districts could make it easier for liberal Democrats to compete with conservative Republicans by building multi-racial coalitions. Blacks "need more representation of their liberal views of policy than they need people who look like them" in Congress, Swain contended. Anyone looking at the toothlessness of the Congressional Black Caucus in the Republican-dominated House would find it difficult to disagree.

But, as Swain says, she "turned from a Pollyanna into a Cassandra" as her research into a book criticizing racial preferences made her aware of the spread of what she calls "the new white nationalism," a form of racial extremism more dangerous than the Ku Klux Klan because of its veneer of erudition and mastery of the Internet. Groups such as former Klansman David Duke's National Organization for European American Rights and the National Association of White People eschew the discredited notion of white supremacy. Indeed, they don't claim that whites are superior to anyone else and may even be inferior to Asians.

Instead they push the notion over websites, in publications such as Jared Taylor's "American Renaissance " magazine and through on-campus recruiting drives that all racial groups have unique interests and the god-given right to fulfill their destiny. They see themselves, as Swain has written, as "defenders of the legitimate civil rights of white people against what they allege are a host of racial double standards." In short, that affirmative action has made whites the most discriminated-against group in the country and that it can only get worse as a tide of immigrants transforms the U.S. from a white nation into a rickety Third World republic. The language white nationalists use to promote their insights is stunningly familiar to anyone who has listened to black nationalists like Louis Farrakhan — but that's not surprising, since the white nationalists appropriated it. As Swain observes, "the multicultural left has provided a language that works very well for whites who want to push white-identity politics," says Swain. "They say that if it's good for blacks to celebrate their heritage, it's good for whites to celebrate theirs."

What concerns Swain the most is such groups now seem to be finding an audience among mainstream whites whose gripes about racial preferences and high crime rates among blacks have been tuned out by white liberal politicians. Though she has no proof that the membership of such groups is mushrooming, their influence is being felt widely. Indeed, some of the rhetoric used by white nationalists is indistinguishable from the verbiage used by President Bush in his assault on the "quotas" supposedly used by the University of Michigan. "If we keep going down this road, it's going to increasingly pit racial groups against each other," she warns. "Some white people, who are otherwise good people, who don't hate blacks, are going to be pushed into the arms of these extremists if we don't change course."

Swain thinks there's only one way out of this bind: recognizing that whites have "legitimate" beefs about race that should be openly debated by politicians and scholars. She also believes we should immediately do away with racial preferences in university admissions, hiring and government contracts that not only fuel white resentment but send the message to blacks that they can't meet the same standards as everyone else. Swain's detractors say such steps amount to no more than a cowardly capitulation to racism, but she won't back down because she does not believe that blacks need the crutch provided by race-conscious policies. For Swain, a deeply devout evangelical Christian, such beliefs are not academic. Now 49, she went from being a high school drop-out and single mother in rural Virginia to a Ph.d and a chair at a leading university. "Somehow, we've got to embrace an American national identity that pulls us together instead of dividing us into warring camps," says Swain, "perhaps through a renewed emphasis on the Judeo-Christian idea of a common creator and the brotherhood of man." It's an old-fashioned idea that could prevent Swain's troubling predictions from coming true.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; carolswain; newwhitenationalism; preferences
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-356 next last
To: cyborg
I read the whole thread and you didn't miss much. While I understand the author's intent, I do not believe there will ever be a race war. I'm very sorry to disappoint some, but not going to happen. I'm amazed at how people will readily give up on American ideals.

Ageed

81 posted on 12/05/2003 6:58:19 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
If you have superior firepower and the other side isn't willing or able to fight back effectively. You win initially but all you do is piss off the other group even more.
82 posted on 12/05/2003 7:02:24 PM PST by U S Army EOD (When the EOD technician screws up, he is always the first to notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
I wouldn't advise anyone nowadays to be inside of large population centers. Compounded by the potential for riots and race wars

I think your on to something there Joe. I noticed that during the Cincinnati riots a couple a year ago that the rioters stayed in their own neighborhoods and didn't venture into those counties where the pick-up driving fellows with the gun-rack and "Charlton Heston is my President" bumper stickers live.

83 posted on 12/05/2003 7:07:57 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
"Somehow, we've got to embrace an American national identity that pulls us together instead of dividing us into warring camps," says Swain

And which political party is the party of warring camps?

84 posted on 12/05/2003 7:09:08 PM PST by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
The first violence won't come from people influenced by
the likes of Duke.
Al-Fuqra or NOI will hit first in large, co-ordinated
attacks.
Well armed whites will see black faces as the enemy.
The "enemy" is not black or white.
The enemy is Islam.
85 posted on 12/05/2003 7:09:26 PM PST by macrahanish #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Falling Down. Good movie. Inaccurately portrayed in the media as "racist". The fact is the only people who died in it were white.

"I'm having a rare morning."
86 posted on 12/05/2003 7:10:49 PM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
The difference is that the US government is based on the rule of law, and a lot of us actually believe in unalienable rights endowed by the Creator. And quite a few of the rest at least pretend to do so.
87 posted on 12/05/2003 7:13:50 PM PST by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Liberals are usually the ones always talking about white racism and resentment; thats why Time is printing this. I think she's just going over the top trying to make a point. Discrimination against whites in hiring and school admissions is not worse than divorce law discrimination against males, for example.
88 posted on 12/05/2003 7:17:16 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Typical liberal drivel from Time mag.Note she was described as a neocon.Parsing their jargon means that she is just slightly to the right of Al Sharpton.[Why are so many of the race hustlers in the dim party refered to as revs.?]
89 posted on 12/05/2003 7:17:58 PM PST by Clint Lippo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Notice how there's no differentiation between what Ms. Swain says and how Time columnist Jack White spins it in some of these responses?

Jack E. White is a far-Left kook who had it out with David Horowitz a couple of years ago (LINK). It appears that Ms. Swain's opinions fall in line with what we believe for the most part at FR, does it not?

So what's up with the dissing of her (even her pic for crying out loud) with no subsequent explanations for said disrespect?


90 posted on 12/05/2003 7:24:59 PM PST by rdb3 (1971 - 2003: From underrated to most anticipated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
You forgot the barf alert times 2. One for the article, and one for the pic.

Huh? She's rather easy on the eyes, IMO.

91 posted on 12/05/2003 7:25:27 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Elliott Jackalope
I Believe You are "Perilously Close" to a concept of reality that our Culture CANNOT SUPPORT!

The Original Precepts of our Constitution REQUIRED THAT "ALL Men are 'Created Equal!!'"

In the American Concept of "Democracy," there can be NO exceptions; Otherwise, the "System" Fails!!

National Origin, "Skin Color," "Religious Affiliation," Political Belief System, are SUPPOSED To Be IRRLEVANT in our "Political System."

WE--AMERICANS--are Supposed to decide our Political Fate.

--Hyphenated--Americans are NOT--& NEVER WILL BE--"Americans!"

"AMERICA" is a TRUE "Melting Pot!!"

IF an Immigrant REFUSES TO "Assimilate," & "Learn our Language, & Become part of Our Culture," then the "Supposed Immigrant" CLEARLY does not wish to accept Western Values.

So Be It!

The "Alleged Immigrant" can become--along with His/Her Children--a Part of "Humanity's BEST hope to 'Go to the Stars,'" or the "Immigrant" can ally "Him/Herself" with a "belief System" dedicated to the Destruction of ANY "Non-Muslim" pursuits!

So, WHERE has "Islam" advanced Humanity??

HOW MANY "ISLAMIC PROPHETS" inhabit Humanity's MOON COLONY??

HOW MANY "Righteous Pillars of Islam" set "Foot" on the Moon, 30 years ago??

IF "W" "Gets His Way," & IF America, once again, goes to the Moon, There will be NO "Affirmative Action;" IF a "Muslim" is included in America's next "Trip to the Moon," he/she will get there on "Merit!"

In America, the "Concept of" "Preferences" is ABHORRENT!

When we go Back to the Moon, Your Racial/Cultural background will be (I HOPE) IRRELEVANT!!

If we "Fail" this "STANDARD," we ALSO "Fail the TEST" to "Go to the Stars!!"

Doc

92 posted on 12/05/2003 7:27:05 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
"There's nothing special about the U.S. that says we couldn't have ethnic cleansing and violence here like in Bosnia or Rwanda."


Only if (when?) we go belly up financially. People who have to much to lose will not let racial tensions cause them to act violently. But people who feel they have nothing to lose might engage in racial violence.
93 posted on 12/05/2003 7:29:00 PM PST by bethelgrad (for God, country, and the Corps OOH RAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
This writer is projecting his own hatred upon white people. There is no anti-black backlash in the making. White people don't want to kill blacks, we just want an end to the lying liberal BS, and we will affect this end in the voting booth.
94 posted on 12/05/2003 7:31:12 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
If she is a Democrat then I have to question the claim that she is a Christian. Abortion, Homosexuality, and removal of the Ten Commandments are inconistent with a belief in Christ.
95 posted on 12/05/2003 7:32:58 PM PST by mrfixit514
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Pogue mahone ommadawn!(SP?) 'scuse me celt! (proud irish) LOL! ;^)

Actually it's spelled with intonation marks I can't do in Html

Pog Mo Thoin.

96 posted on 12/05/2003 7:33:26 PM PST by Vidi_Vici_Vinnny (An armed man is a Citizen. An unarmed man is a Subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Remember they spend their entire day where they are the overwhelming majority, The "race-war" enthusiasts also might be counting on their being a more cohesive group than the white majority, and more willing to use violence.

Not true. Los Angeles for example, the latinos, many illegal, have moved into areas of black populations in a big way. This is happening in almost all major cities now. The tension is great in many large cities. I've seen it close up.

97 posted on 12/05/2003 7:34:07 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
excellent point... of course a race war would be like intravenous viagra for the libs. Not only that, but they'd be guaranteed publishing options so they can write ad nauseum about it (the wars). Notice the people who are the ones talking about race wars... the WAR Aryan nation types and the liberal dweebs.
98 posted on 12/05/2003 7:37:43 PM PST by cyborg (mutt-american)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
Oh dear... I know many men who have had children taken away, disappear,etc. with evil ex-wives.
99 posted on 12/05/2003 7:38:34 PM PST by cyborg (mutt-american)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: expatguy
[ If a white person wrote this exact same article he would have been fired at the very least. ]

sadly, exactely...

100 posted on 12/05/2003 7:45:45 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-356 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson