[hchutch]

Show the evidence that the war effort has been harmed, and that wrongdoing by Norauist was a factor, and I'll discuss it further. But as it stands right now, this sounds less like a serious call for a legitimate investigation and instead it is more along the lines of Gary Sick's wild accusations and Tom Foley's fishing expedition that didn't find anything.

I don't want the war effort or President Bush's re-election harmed, either. The latter is a critical step towards ensuring the war effort succeeds. I do not want that jeopordized because some conservatives decided to make political hay at the expense of Grover Norquist.

So, produce proof that Norquist's outreach and actions harmed the war effort, and then there would be a basis for assuming there is a problem. But there has been no harm to the war effort. You yourself have said it is going well.

I can only conclude that your motives are more about reducing Grover Norquist's influence than they are about a genuine concern for national security and the war effort.

[Sabertooth]

Show the evidence that the war effort has been harmed, and that wrongdoing by Norauist was a factor, and I'll discuss it further.

Quite an unserious proposal. Norquist is up to his ears in terror symps. Why?

Or rather, why don't you want to know why?