Posted on 12/14/2003 12:24:11 PM PST by jern
Print this article Close This Window Saddam's Capture Roils 2004 White House Race Sun December 14, 2003 01:47 PM ET
By Patricia Wilson WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Saddam Hussein's capture injected a dramatic new twist into the 2004 White House race on Sunday, bringing President Bush more good news and complicating the message of his Democratic rivals.
With the U.S. economy on the upswing and now the former Iraqi dictator in jail, the nine Democrats vying for the right to challenge Bush next year are once again having to refine their arguments for replacing him.
The most immediate effects, analysts said, would be a spike in the polls for Bush, vindication for the four candidates who voted to allow Bush to go to war in Iraq and short-term trouble for the front-running Howard Dean whose campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination is built around his fervent opposition to the U.S.-led invasion.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, who along with Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, Rep. Richard Gephardt of Missouri and Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, voted for the war resolution passed by the U.S. Congress, pounced on Saddam's capture to attack Dean.
"This news makes clear the choice the Democrats face next year," Lieberman said. "If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power today, not in prison, and the world would be a much more dangerous place."
The Democratic presidential hopefuls have used the chaotic situation in Iraq, where 197 U.S. soldiers have died in guerrilla attacks since Bush declared major combat operations over on May 1, to slam the president for failing to gain enough international cooperation for the war and not planning adequately for its messy aftermath.
"The fact of the matter is, as (Defense) Secretary (Donald) Rumsfeld said, we still have a long, hard slog to finish the job in Iraq," said Brad Woodhouse, spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "The capture of Saddam Hussein is not the silver bullet that fixes everything."
Bush, whose approval ratings have been hard hit by the escalating violence, should get a quick boost, said Jennifer Duffy, an analyst for the Cook Report, a nonpartisan political newsletter.
"More important is whether it sticks," she said. "Or is this going to be a temporary blip?" The general election is 11 months away.
But the battle among the Democrats for their party's nomination begins in earnest with the Iowa caucuses on Jan. 19 and Saddam's arrest could be used to slow Dean's momentum. The former governor of Vermont was scheduled to give a major foreign policy address in Los Angeles on Monday.
Duffy said the long-sought arrest "took the edge off the argument of someone like Dean."
Democratic activist Donna Brazile, campaign manager for Vice President Al Gore in the 2000 election, said it would allow Lieberman, Gephardt, Kerry and Edwards to put their yes votes behind them, but she did not believe it would hamper Dean in the long run.
"Now people will start asking 'Where is Osama?"' Brazile said.
Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a Republican, said Saddam's capture made Dean "smaller" as a candidate, but Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist predicted Democrats would simply "reposition" themselves to continue attacking Bush's conduct of the war.
"In talking to the president this morning, he made it very clear in his own mind that politics has nothing, nothing, nothing to do with today," the Tennessee Republican said on "Fox News Sunday."
Campaigning in Florida, Dean congratulated the U.S. troops who nabbed Saddam on Saturday and said the development should "set a new course" for internationalizing Iraqi reconstruction allowing the United States to bring soldiers home.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© Copyright Reuters 2003. All rights reserved. Any copying, re-publication or re-distribution of Reuters content or of any content used on this site, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without prior written consent of Reuters. Quotes and other data are provided for your personal information only, and are not intended for trading purposes. Reuters, the members of its Group and its data providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the quotes or other data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
© Reuters 2003. All rights reserved. Republication or
This shows just how stupid the liberal media is, and just how stupid they assume that you are. The Dems have nothing to offer but bitching and promises to prop up the status quo. How can they possibly compete with a president that is actually getting things done? I'm not happy with everything GW is doing, but I'll take it over the ideas of the DemonRats fighting each other for the RAT nomination.
Bush was going to beat them anyway. Now the race is as placid as can be. He's going to clock 'em.
Leave it to Reuters to mince words. What they really mean to say is that the nine Democrats vying for the right to challenge Bush next year are once again having to invent some new lies.
Dear Donna:
He's been dead for months, but GWB is keeping it a secret until October.
Something about a hedge for the rating games of November.
What is particularly appalling is that this author, and those like her, think only in terms of partisan politics.
Looking for a clean pair of underwear.
Perfection is just not good enough for the Democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.