1 posted on
12/14/2003 12:24:12 PM PST by
jern
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: jern
Saddam Hussein's capture injected a dramatic new twist into the 2004 White House race on Sunday... This shows just how stupid the liberal media is, and just how stupid they assume that you are. The Dems have nothing to offer but bitching and promises to prop up the status quo. How can they possibly compete with a president that is actually getting things done? I'm not happy with everything GW is doing, but I'll take it over the ideas of the DemonRats fighting each other for the RAT nomination.
To: jern
I can't wait to get Osama. Then we can hound scumbags like Brazile and Sharpton and taunt them "Where is Bin Laden".
3 posted on
12/14/2003 12:29:50 PM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: jern
Once again, Donna Brazeer, the Booby-Head Dimowit, speaks - "People are going to start to say 'where's Osama?'".
My guess would be, shivering in a cave somewhere, saying "maybe I'm next!" to his favorite goat girlfriend.
4 posted on
12/14/2003 12:29:55 PM PST by
Theresawithanh
(Just a conservative CA gal, living in lib-land....)
To: jern
Interpreted Headline: Dems in quagmire.
5 posted on
12/14/2003 12:30:00 PM PST by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: jern
It will matter little how the 9 dwarfs or anyone else tries to al-gorize themselves and their platforms. America can now see their duplicity and disingenuous character for what it is.
Come Thanksgiving all that the alpoMedia will have to talk about is how could it be that the DimWits were only able to hold onto one state and squeaked by at that. Then they turn to lamenting about the loss of seats in the house and the senate giving the Republicans a SUPER majority and how we are all doomed.
6 posted on
12/14/2003 12:31:20 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: jern
Roils? The RATS are bunch of McGoverns. Lilliputians.
Bush was going to beat them anyway. Now the race is as placid as can be. He's going to clock 'em.
To: jern
With the U.S. economy on the upswing and now the former Iraqi dictator in jail, the nine Democrats vying for the right to challenge Bush next year are once again having to refine their arguments for replacing him.Leave it to Reuters to mince words. What they really mean to say is that the nine Democrats vying for the right to challenge Bush next year are once again having to invent some new lies.
To: jern
"
"Now people will start asking 'Where is Osama?"' Brazile said."
Dear Donna:
He's been dead for months, but GWB is keeping it a secret until October.
Something about a hedge for the rating games of November.
12 posted on
12/14/2003 12:41:32 PM PST by
G.Mason
To: jern
Saddam Hussein's capture injected a dramatic new twist into the 2004 White House race on Sunday, bringing President Bush more good news and complicating the message of his Democratic rivals. What is particularly appalling is that this author, and those like her, think only in terms of partisan politics.
To: jern
Now people will start asking 'Where is Osama?"' Brazile said. Looking for a clean pair of underwear.
15 posted on
12/14/2003 12:47:42 PM PST by
tbpiper
To: jern
Bush's TG Day trip involved a fake turkey. The Democratic Presidential Primaries involve the real ones.
16 posted on
12/14/2003 12:51:10 PM PST by
.cnI redruM
(With the capture of Saddam Hussein, Howard Dean needs a new shadow VP candidate.)
To: jern
and short-term trouble for the front-running Howard Dean
Oh please, you got to be kidding me. Short term, he would be lucky, for what he is and has say, if he would get his own state. Mr. Dean, tear down seal of your documents!
To: jern
Democratic activist Donna Brazile, said..."Now people will start asking 'Where is Osama?"' Brazile said. Perfection is just not good enough for the Democrats.
18 posted on
12/14/2003 12:59:37 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(A poem, by Lazamataz: "What do we do with Saddam, Now that we gottim?")
And what are the 'Rats doing to get Osama Bin Laden.?
Oh, that's right,
JACK
SQUAT!
21 posted on
12/14/2003 1:05:58 PM PST by
CounterCounterCulture
(Anagram of my screenname: TRUE UNCLE TRUER COCONUT)
"The capture of Saddam Hussein is not the silver bullet that fixes everything."
This is a strawman; no one said that the capture of Saddam Hussein *is* the silver bullet that fixes everything.
Democrats piss me off.
24 posted on
12/14/2003 1:09:30 PM PST by
EverFree
(Don't F. with the W.)
To: jern
Obviously, Hillary told the military where Saddam was hiding in order to sabotage the dean campaign. <8-)
25 posted on
12/14/2003 1:12:28 PM PST by
snopercod
(The federal government will spend $21,000 per household in 2003, up from $16,000 in 1999.)
To: jern
With the U.S. economy on the upswing and now the former Iraqi dictator in jail, the nine Democrats vying for the right to challenge Bush next year are once again having to refine their arguments for replacing him. Yes, cleary they just to to refine and tweak them a bit ...
What a great Sunday !
To: jern
Stupid is as stupid does. Over and over and over and over again.
28 posted on
12/14/2003 1:25:04 PM PST by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers)
To: jern
"said Brad Woodhouse, spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "The capture of Saddam Hussein is not the silver bullet that fixes everything." True, but it sure as hell trumps the "shit bullet" that the Democrats have been firing at random....
Semper Fi
To: jern
30 posted on
12/14/2003 1:44:03 PM PST by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson