Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reuters: Saddam's Capture Roils 2004 White House Race
Reuters ^ | Dec. 14, 2003 | Patricia Wilson

Posted on 12/14/2003 12:24:11 PM PST by jern

Print this article Close This Window Saddam's Capture Roils 2004 White House Race Sun December 14, 2003 01:47 PM ET

By Patricia Wilson WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Saddam Hussein's capture injected a dramatic new twist into the 2004 White House race on Sunday, bringing President Bush more good news and complicating the message of his Democratic rivals.

With the U.S. economy on the upswing and now the former Iraqi dictator in jail, the nine Democrats vying for the right to challenge Bush next year are once again having to refine their arguments for replacing him.

The most immediate effects, analysts said, would be a spike in the polls for Bush, vindication for the four candidates who voted to allow Bush to go to war in Iraq and short-term trouble for the front-running Howard Dean whose campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination is built around his fervent opposition to the U.S.-led invasion.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, who along with Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, Rep. Richard Gephardt of Missouri and Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, voted for the war resolution passed by the U.S. Congress, pounced on Saddam's capture to attack Dean.

"This news makes clear the choice the Democrats face next year," Lieberman said. "If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power today, not in prison, and the world would be a much more dangerous place."

The Democratic presidential hopefuls have used the chaotic situation in Iraq, where 197 U.S. soldiers have died in guerrilla attacks since Bush declared major combat operations over on May 1, to slam the president for failing to gain enough international cooperation for the war and not planning adequately for its messy aftermath.

"The fact of the matter is, as (Defense) Secretary (Donald) Rumsfeld said, we still have a long, hard slog to finish the job in Iraq," said Brad Woodhouse, spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "The capture of Saddam Hussein is not the silver bullet that fixes everything."

Bush, whose approval ratings have been hard hit by the escalating violence, should get a quick boost, said Jennifer Duffy, an analyst for the Cook Report, a nonpartisan political newsletter.

"More important is whether it sticks," she said. "Or is this going to be a temporary blip?" The general election is 11 months away.

But the battle among the Democrats for their party's nomination begins in earnest with the Iowa caucuses on Jan. 19 and Saddam's arrest could be used to slow Dean's momentum. The former governor of Vermont was scheduled to give a major foreign policy address in Los Angeles on Monday.

Duffy said the long-sought arrest "took the edge off the argument of someone like Dean."

Democratic activist Donna Brazile, campaign manager for Vice President Al Gore in the 2000 election, said it would allow Lieberman, Gephardt, Kerry and Edwards to put their yes votes behind them, but she did not believe it would hamper Dean in the long run.

"Now people will start asking 'Where is Osama?"' Brazile said.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a Republican, said Saddam's capture made Dean "smaller" as a candidate, but Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist predicted Democrats would simply "reposition" themselves to continue attacking Bush's conduct of the war.

"In talking to the president this morning, he made it very clear in his own mind that politics has nothing, nothing, nothing to do with today," the Tennessee Republican said on "Fox News Sunday."

Campaigning in Florida, Dean congratulated the U.S. troops who nabbed Saddam on Saturday and said the development should "set a new course" for internationalizing Iraqi reconstruction allowing the United States to bring soldiers home.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Copyright Reuters 2003. All rights reserved. Any copying, re-publication or re-distribution of Reuters content or of any content used on this site, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without prior written consent of Reuters. Quotes and other data are provided for your personal information only, and are not intended for trading purposes. Reuters, the members of its Group and its data providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the quotes or other data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

© Reuters 2003. All rights reserved. Republication or


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; ageofliberty; howarddean; saddam; saddamcapture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
And what are the 'Rats doing to get Osama Bin Laden.?

Oh, that's right,
JACK
SQUAT!
21 posted on 12/14/2003 1:05:58 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (Anagram of my screenname: TRUE UNCLE TRUER COCONUT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matrix2225
Lieberman has always acted as though he had more info on the whole Saddam/Osama deal. Typical of the shallow analysis of Dems to not see the long term fallout of this.

After the fall of Iraq a few brave Iraqi souls came forward with information. As the resolve of the coalition became more evident, more came forward. Even more did so after Bush's visit. I fully expect the intel floodgates to open after this. Furthermore, I expect freedom loving Iraqis to more actively seek revenge against the Saddam remnant.

Saddam may eventually talk, and if he does, it will be gravy. Much more will be learned from the citizenry before then.

22 posted on 12/14/2003 1:06:24 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Q: "Where's Osama?" A: "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"

Who is Kenneth?

23 posted on 12/14/2003 1:07:04 PM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

"The capture of Saddam Hussein is not the silver bullet that fixes everything."

This is a strawman; no one said that the capture of Saddam Hussein *is* the silver bullet that fixes everything.

Democrats piss me off.

24 posted on 12/14/2003 1:09:30 PM PST by EverFree (Don't F. with the W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Obviously, Hillary told the military where Saddam was hiding in order to sabotage the dean campaign. <8-)
25 posted on 12/14/2003 1:12:28 PM PST by snopercod (The federal government will spend $21,000 per household in 2003, up from $16,000 in 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
With the U.S. economy on the upswing and now the former Iraqi dictator in jail, the nine Democrats vying for the right to challenge Bush next year are once again having to refine their arguments for replacing him.

Yes, cleary they just to to refine and tweak them a bit ...

What a great Sunday !

26 posted on 12/14/2003 1:13:30 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
What's the frequency, Kenneth?
27 posted on 12/14/2003 1:16:39 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jern
Stupid is as stupid does. Over and over and over and over again.
28 posted on 12/14/2003 1:25:04 PM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
"said Brad Woodhouse, spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "The capture of Saddam Hussein is not the silver bullet that fixes everything."

True, but it sure as hell trumps the "shit bullet" that the Democrats have been firing at random....

Semper Fi

29 posted on 12/14/2003 1:42:37 PM PST by river rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern

30 posted on 12/14/2003 1:44:03 PM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Long way to Nov 2004 and the American public has a short memory and attention span and CFR ain't gonna let any ads on TV where most people get their news to remind them of facts

SOOOO the bill Bush signed may com back to haunt him
31 posted on 12/14/2003 1:44:32 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
The Deaniacs over at DUmmys are losing their nerve. The internecine warfare has begun!
32 posted on 12/14/2003 1:47:25 PM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gumption
"If you two really think that, then you do not know your President. He's not a political monster."

Your wire is stretched too thin.

33 posted on 12/14/2003 1:49:16 PM PST by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Your wire is stretched too thin.

Don't think about my wire OK.

So you go along with the DUers on this kind of thinking huh?

How long do you think Bush held Saddum in that hole? And why did he let him out now?

34 posted on 12/14/2003 1:56:07 PM PST by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jern
This caps off a rough week for the dems. First the Dow surpasses 10,000 then saddam is captured. They must be reeling at DNC HQ. Their quiver has basically run out of arrows. Oh well, they will just have to continue to make bulk purchases of the 'books' by michael 'homeless guy' moore and Al 'when was I ever funny?' franken in an effort to convince themselves and the naive public that they are still relevant.
35 posted on 12/14/2003 2:04:14 PM PST by American Infidel (Death penalty not a deterrent? What is the recidivism rate among criminals who receive it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
The Dim candidates should be very careful about asking for Osama-they may get their wish.
36 posted on 12/14/2003 2:04:48 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (But maybe it's just my imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
...vindication for the four candidates who voted to allow Bush to go to war in Iraq...

But I thought that John F'ing Kerry (who, by the way, served in Viet Nam) backed away from his vote by claiming that he only authorized the THREAT of going to war, not actually going to war.

-PJ

37 posted on 12/14/2003 2:07:47 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Al Gore, once again, shows how he has absolutely terrible political timing. Coming out with a major anti-war speech in support of Dean, just days ago.
38 posted on 12/14/2003 2:51:57 PM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Next Capture:

HILLARY
39 posted on 12/14/2003 3:01:16 PM PST by Joy Angela (Hillary is Really Angry Now: BUSH **IS** The MAN!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh
It's sad, that everything is judged by
the 2004 election.

FREEDOM was at stake.

And the Iraqis won today.

Double-Shame on the RATS.

40 posted on 12/14/2003 3:03:00 PM PST by Joy Angela (Hillary is Really Angry Now: BUSH **IS** The MAN!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson