Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldilucky
They are not entitled to foodstamps and neither are they entitled to any other economic assistance.

Maybe we can agree that nobody, citizen or not, is entitled to foodstamps. I would prefer that nobody recieved taxpayer funded food, housing, loans, grants, or money because they are disabled, unemployed, or retired.

Many arguments I read about illegal immigration focus on the amount of money needed to supply illegals with all the socialist goodies that American citizen feed on. I prefer to focus on the problem (socialism run amok) rather than the symptom (illegals getting a piece of the social spending pie.)

267 posted on 01/06/2004 9:13:25 PM PST by Once-Ler (Proud Republican and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: Once-Ler
"Maybe we can agree that nobody, citizen or not, is entitled to foodstamps. I would prefer that nobody recieved taxpayer funded food, housing, loans, grants, or money because they are disabled, unemployed, or retired."

I can agree with this although the original intent of foodstamps and welfare was for single unemployed mothers who were natural born citizens.

Maybe just abolish the income tax as it is communist in structure. Taxing somebody's wages to give partly to another is a violation of due process. But that's a separate issue.
271 posted on 01/07/2004 2:08:57 AM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson