Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hsmomx3
I don’t know that much about the flight paths. Some help please.
A flight from Paris to LAX would over fly ALL of the US. If the terrorist took control of the flight on the east coast they could fly the plane anywhere in the US?

So Los Angeles itself wouldn’t necessarily be the target but the flight could divert quickly over its flight path??

What do you think??

166 posted on 12/24/2003 11:20:55 AM PST by Lurking in Kansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking in Kansas
That sounds pretty reasonable. I have family driving from SLC to Phoenix and they are going to stop over in Vegas. Maybe they shouldn't go that route.
174 posted on 12/24/2003 11:23:11 AM PST by hsmomx3 (Want higher taxes? Don't move to Arizona.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking in Kansas
Paris to LAX would spend more time over Canada than US IMHO , pretty much come over the pole.
178 posted on 12/24/2003 11:23:31 AM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking in Kansas
A flight from Paris to LAX would over fly ALL of the US. If the terrorist took control of the flight on the east coast they could fly the plane anywhere in the US?

My guess is that the flight would cross through Canada entering the U.S. somewhere over Montanna or west of the Rockies before traveling down to L.A. Trans-continental flights follow the curvature of the globe, not the straight line lattitude path.

182 posted on 12/24/2003 11:24:15 AM PST by fourhorsemen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking in Kansas
>>I don’t know that much about the flight paths. Some help please.
A flight from Paris to LAX would over fly ALL of the US. If the terrorist took control of the flight on the east coast they could fly the plane anywhere in the US?
So Los Angeles itself wouldn’t necessarily be the target but the flight could divert quickly over its flight path??

What do you think<<

This is what I've been thinking!

Couldn't these flights be diverted anywhere in the U.S.?
185 posted on 12/24/2003 11:24:28 AM PST by sissyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking in Kansas
I don’t know that much about the flight paths. Some help please.

A flight from Paris to LAX would over fly ALL of the US. If the terrorist took control of the flight on the east coast they could fly the plane anywhere in the US? So Los Angeles itself wouldn’t necessarily be the target but the flight could divert quickly over its flight path??

What do you think??

I agree that is possible. Also I believe one flight was set to land in Cincinnati before proceeding to LAX, but that came from a tv reporter, and I cannot vouch it is totally correct.

208 posted on 12/24/2003 11:27:47 AM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking in Kansas
The 911 planes were all west coast bound presumably to have more fuel in the crash.
209 posted on 12/24/2003 11:27:48 AM PST by tort_feasor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking in Kansas
A flight from Paris to LAX would over fly ALL of the US. If the terrorist took control of the flight on the east coast they could fly the plane anywhere in the US?

So Los Angeles itself wouldn’t necessarily be the target but the flight could divert quickly over its flight path??

Agreed. Could be that one was for dc, one for ny, and another for LA. Departure times sync-ed so that all could be taken over and crashed simultaneously.

218 posted on 12/24/2003 11:29:27 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson