For 2004, Bush Has Strength in the White Male Numbers

LA Times ^ | Dec. 28, 2003 | Ronald Brownstein

[BureaucratusMaximus]

For 2004, Bush Has Strength in the White Male Numbers

Well...duh!

[Nea Wood]

Younger, married white men are disastrously, overwhelmingly Republican," he said."

Well, what the heck do the Dems expect? They never miss a chance to demonize white, heterosexual males and blame them for everything! The only white, heterosexual males who are acceptable are those who are metrosexual, who are not Christian, or who are "really" something else, (like Bill Clinton was "really" black.) They can't make white, heterosexual men into the evil boogeymen of the world and then expect those same guys to vote for them.

[4Freedom]

We need to force these free-loading, thieving, scamming, law-breaking, Marxist/Socialist, 3rd-world, open-borders, one-worlder, Liberal Democrat/RINO-supporting illegal aliens to deport themselves.

They steal enough from the U.S. Taxpayers every year to live comfortably and send $30 billion dollars back home to Mexico.

We don't need a single one of them here.

Maybe Shu Shu can bring us up to speed on some of the latest ways illegal aliens are bilking the U.S. Taxpayers out of EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT CHECKS and using the U.S. Taxpayer's own money to by property in the USA.

They're all criminals.

[chimera]

"Recent polls underscore the challenge for Democrats with white men. In an ABC/Washington Post survey released last week, white men preferred Bush over an unnamed Democrat in 2004 by 62% to 29%, a head-turning 33-point margin; by contrast, white women gave Bush just a 10-point lead."

These Rat spinmeisters are amazing. "Just" a ten point lead? Cripes, if that holds up for the election, it will be a landslide of major proportions. Throw in the 33-point lead among males, and Bush is probably looking at a win in the high fifty percent margin, comparable to Reagan in '84 and Nixon in '72 (which is what a lot of people have been comparing a Bush-Dean contest to).

Not to say anyone on the Bush side should get cocky and overconfident, because they have to push this thing as hard as they can to the end, since the Rats and presstitutes will fight Bush tooth and nail down and dirty all the way, but if these numbers hold up its looking pretty good at this point. The lamestream media went ga-ga over rapist slimemold Clinton's low forty percent win in '92, saying how much of an amazing "mandate" it was, and now Bush has "just" a ten point lead. Sheesh!

[budwiesest]

The only REALISTIC solution is to close the borders, to stop illegal immigration,

After giving it some thought, the only LASTING solution would be to invade and conquer every inch of land all-the-way to the Panama Canal and declare it US territory.

Then we could clean up the messes these countries have created for themselves, causing the pressure to come here in the first place.

[Anticommie]

For 2004, Bush Has Strength in the White Male Numbers

ANGRY WHITE MEN finally got really "angry".

[4Freedom]

"She (the mamasita) encourages them to run around on their wives."

Then it's no coincidence that the madam in a Mexican whore house is called "mamasita" I suppose, is it?

[politicalwit]

"By not voting for Bush, you are effectively voting for Dean or whoever the Dem candidate is and you exactly WILL be complicit in the destruction of the US, aiding those whose goal is to destroy America."

Your logic tells me that you approve of a larger and expanded government and the erosion of our Constitutional rights. That IS the direction GW has taken us.

[longtermmemmory]

All their sentiments speak to their efforts to emasculate men in general. Using words like "myth" is an effort of revisionist history of what it is to be a man. The left does not like men, fathers, or manliness. They prefer "parent".

Have you ever noticed how when the left uses "empower" they inevitably do not speak of men? For them, "empower" means quotas for women. (feminist majority organizations)

The Democrat Party will continue to marginalize itself because they only answer to the most hostile special interest groups.

As to men WITH degrees, my man on the street observation is that men WITH degrees are far more likely to be Republican. Single men do not like what feminists represent any more than anyone else. They want to get married and would like to have families some day. The percentages do not favor that with democrats or feminists.

If you are even marginally ambitious in life, there is no future for you with the Democrat party if you are a white male.

[need_a_screen_name]

You know what? You single-issue guys never fail to disgust me. Thank God, the Left has the same problem with their narrow-minded folks, and that they out number ours.

You mean like all the Freepers who use the pro-life litmus test on everyone they consider voting for? Yes, you have a point...

[4Freedom]

Hey Onyx, I just thought of something else that "disgusts me."

I've never seen the leaders of the Catholic Church in Mexico protest legalized prostitution in Mexico the way the leaders of the Catholic Church in Puerto Rico protested the presence of the U.S. Navy in Puerto Rico.

The Catholic Church has helped close three U.S. Naval bases in Puerto Rico.

How many houses of prostitution has the Catholic Church helped close in Mexico?

[Vision]

Can we move past race?

In my opinion, any good American is voting for Bush.

[longtermmemmory]

You have to think of the long term. You have zero chance of a ture discourse on conservative issues with the Democrat party on the political stage. Eliminate the democrats from the political arena and you open the door to a debate between republicans about conservative ideas.

We are still working with a europe which is in denial that the democrat party no longer sets the agenda. I am seeing the same denial in Europe that existed in 1983. The could not grasp how reagan could be re-elected.

If you want to make a difference ten years, fifteen, twenty years for your grandchildren and so on; we have to change the cast of players. This means politically, electorally making the Democrats exinct. If it means holding your nose when you and I vote, so be it.

[ATOMIC_PUNK]

Yeah. And how dare they refer to me as "white?"

I don't know my skin is kinda peach looking unless i get to much sun then its kinda salmon. "go figure"

[King Prout]

After giving it some thought, the only LASTING solution would be to invade and conquer every inch of land all-the-way to the Panama Canal and declare it US territory.

That has been my opinion since 1986, when I first became acutely aware of the gathering storm to the south.

[longtermmemmory]

seems like nafta was the first step to that.

How many mexican provinces would want to become states?

[King Prout]

I'm actually hoping that what appears to be Dubya's lunacy is actually long-term "strategery" with the ultimate goal of either making a working nation out of Mexico, or eventual incorporation of Mexico into the US as provinces or probationary States.
I'm allowed to hope, yes?

[budwiesest]

As many as it takes to stem the flood of illegals. The whole 'enchilada' if that's what it takes. We bring Mexico out of third world status and the lure to escape evaporates.

I wouldn't care, if they weren't right next door where I have to deal with their inability to run a country. Think 'lousy neighbor' where you don't have the option of moving. This limits your options.

[pogo101]

Before reading this, I was all for Dean or Kucinich or maybe Mosely Braun, see? But then I realized, "I'm a white male!! What was I THINKING?" And now I'm going to vote for Bush. See how that works?

/sarcasm

[FairOpinion]

"In my opinion, any good American is voting for Bush."

==

Exactly!