Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woe is Dean
28 December, 2003 | Andy Obermann

Posted on 12/28/2003 4:22:16 PM PST by AndyObermann

Woe is Dean

By: Andy Obermann

For months, Howard Dean has berated President Bush for any number of supposed failures. From the economy to the War on Terror, Dr. Dean seems to find fault with nearly all of the President's policies. Dean's angry rhetoric is grasping the attention of the extreme left--positioning him well for early victories in the Democratic primary season. Recent events, however, seem to be sucking the steam from the Dean machine.

Let's start with the economy. Dean claims that Bush's policies directed toward re-establishing the American economy have been failures. According to Dean, the Administration has created a "financial disaster…the likes of which has not been seen since the Great Depression." His imaginary indicators have evidently led him away from reality.

Coming off the strongest quarter of growth in the past two decades (8.2% in the third quarter), the economy seems to be maintaining a strong up swing. The President's tax cuts have been successful. Jobs, slowly but surely, are recovering. Each week, the number of unemployment claims drop, by a small margin, yes, but it adds up. The stock market is booming. The Dow has topped 10,000 for the first time in 18 months--and continues to show staying power for the long haul. The manufacturing sector is also showing signs of growth. In the September through November period, the sector's annual rate of growth topped 5.9%. Housing costs are dropping and inflation is at nonexistent levels. Interest rates are low and continue to maintain their record rock bottom levels. All of this just doesn’t add up well for the Dean camp.

Adding to the tally is the success of the War on Terror. If one only listens to Dean, we are fighting a losing battle. Iraqi militants and Saddam loyalists are overtaking our troops, killing them in record numbers. This simply is not fact. In our nine-month engagement we've lost less than 500 men. Every loss is terrible, don't get me wrong, but it must be kept in perspective. We lost this many men weekly at the height of the Vietnam War. Our soldiers have captured or killed every member of the Iraqi 52 most wanted, the vaunted "Deck of Cards." This includes the ace of spades, Saddam himself. Concerning that capture, who can forget Dean's infamous statement, "America is no safer after the capture of Saddam Hussein."

Well Governor, that just isn't so. How can Dean stand in front of the American people, with a straight face, and claim we are no safer after the capture of Hussein? What is this man thinking? Even Democratic Party loyalists shudder at this assertion. Number one, Saddam's embarrassing capture was a demoralizing blow to those seeking to kill our troops in Iraq. Secondly, it may also have been a blow to terrorists across the Middle East. For example, Libyan dictator Moammar Qaddafi, only a few short days after the capture of Saddam Hussein, announced his intention to give up all weapons programs his government has pursued over the past three decades. It seems this will lead to the end of his support of international terrorists, as well.

The leftist response is that our intelligence agencies had been conferring with Qaddafi for months in order to reach such an announcement. These meetings had been taking place since February. This is true. The rebuttal that I give is this: If all of this bargaining and negotiating had been going on for months, why is it that it took Saddam's capture to force Qaddafi into going public with these revelations. Maybe the scene of the deposed Iraqi dictator checked and scrubbed for lice sent quivers down Qaddafi's spine. Perhaps Saddam's capture the final straw for the Libyan dictator. Who knows what's going on in his head, but I can assert Saddam's apprehension caused Qaddafi some major soul searching.

How does this make Americans safe? Easy. Our intelligence agencies have shown that for years, Qaddafi has funded terror organizations, bent on destroying the west. If his weapons programs were to come to fruition, they could have been funneled into such organizations that would use these weapons to launch major assaults on our troops in Iraq. And, quite possibly, Americans here at home. Simply put, Qaddafi's concessions have made us safer. The capture of Hussein could not have acted as a deterrent in these revelations.

Every day I hope Dean will be the Democratic nominee in '04. It will be fun to watch President Bush beat him like a drum.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; dean; economy; election; howwarddean; iraq; qaddafi; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: AndyObermann
According to Dean, Bush is a failure in the War on Terror. Do we even know what Dean would have done differently save leaving Saddam in power? Has he laid out his strategy? My guess is that, for starters, he would negotiate with the terrorists, after admitting that US policies created Islamic terrorism.
21 posted on 12/28/2003 6:18:20 PM PST by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Dean in his insane mind, thinks the whole country is liberal, and he is going to run as a leftist.

I agree with this statement to a point, because it would be typical of a easterner who has led a rather sheltered and elite lifestyle.

However, he has political advisers and the the evidence is that he plans to talk about his faith and God as he goes to the South.

All this leads me to believe that he will pander to all that will listen and change the message as Clinton did because winning is everything to his advisers, even if Dean does not believe what he is saying.(just the political reality)

22 posted on 12/28/2003 8:43:49 PM PST by Cold Heat ("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 3Lean
I can't imagine how much easier they could make things for Bush

LOL! Al Sharpton or Dennis Kucinich(sp) would be a real hoot.

23 posted on 12/28/2003 8:47:33 PM PST by Cold Heat ("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
I think daschle is up in 04. Perhaps about 50k republicans could move to SD for a month or so and vote the guy out.
24 posted on 12/28/2003 8:48:41 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
>>...begging for non-Iowans to flood into Iowa to make sure Dean wins the caucuses.

Ain't gonna happen. The DemonRats in Iowa who go to caucuses are extreme party activists. They know one another. One just can't walk into a caucus and vote. Caucuses happen at the precinct level - people here know their neighbors - so some smarmy out of state activist will be obvious.
25 posted on 12/28/2003 8:54:51 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (The only recent good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Uh, you wouldn't be casting stones t'ward Jimmah?
26 posted on 12/29/2003 12:42:53 AM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Works fo me.
27 posted on 12/29/2003 12:45:14 AM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: river rat
Short man syndrome!!!
28 posted on 12/29/2003 12:46:26 AM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
However, he has political advisers and the the evidence is that he plans to talk about his faith and God as he goes to the South. All this leads me to believe that he will pander to all that will listen and change the message as Clinton did because winning is everything to his advisers, even if Dean does not believe what he is saying.(just the political reality)

True. But a concurrent reality is that the candidate no longer controls the message. In 1992, only the scientific and academic elites had access to the Internet, and there were no conservative media outlets except for Rush Limbaugh. This allowed Clinton to flip-flop and lie with impunity, because the news media let him get away with it. In 2003-2004, everyone can get on the Net, and there are so many conservative media outlets online and offline that the Democratic candidate will not be able to get away with making mutually exclusive claims to different interest groups. Every time he does, he will be caught and humiliated. And by the time the general election comes around, hardly anyone in the country will trust him.

29 posted on 12/29/2003 1:00:06 AM PST by Dont Mention the War
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
However, he has political advisers and the the evidence is that he plans to talk about his faith and God as he goes to the South.

Dean's advisors are also kind of on the nutty side, he is actually quite involved with campaign strategy. His talk about bible thumping down south, wasn't based on any kind of research, it was an assumption that was made.

These guys watch TV or play on the internet and bite into every sterotype of everything and then try and figure out strategy. He's not planning on running to the center , I think there going to try and see how they can sell there leftist messsage to the center.

30 posted on 12/29/2003 10:35:40 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
Dean listens to his bloggers.

Deans bloggers are more nuts then he is,he's going to have a great campaign theme.

"In your heart you know I'm right and in your guts you know I'm nuts".

31 posted on 12/29/2003 10:37:47 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AndyObermann
<<>> Here is a 'wonderful' letter to the editor I just found from a supposed Republican who is going to vote for Dean: <<>> "In response to criticism of Howard Dean by Republicans, Republicans are also mad at George W. Bush. Here's why I support Dean's candidacy: Dean's support doesn't come just from hard-core Democrats; he's also attracting independents, former Perot supporters, Greens and even moderate Republicans. He can't be judged by one group of his supporters; he's a proven moderate on most issues. Yes, many Democrats are angry with the president, but they aren't stupid; Dean is attracting the most support and enthusiasm because he is the best candidate to beat the current president, the most electable. That's why conservatives like George Will are trying to smear him. All Americans have something to vent about: While Dean has a proven record of being fiscally responsible, expanding health care, and supporting civil rights, Bush has a proven record of doing just the opposite. Of course people are angry. Bush is damaging the United States in ways too numerous to count. Bush is a near complete moron when it comes to foreign policy and aleniates the world with his policies." <<>>
32 posted on 12/29/2003 10:43:28 AM PST by Tacos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacos
Sorry...forgot the gag warning!
33 posted on 12/29/2003 10:44:13 AM PST by Tacos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AndyObermann
"Woe the day"

Tom Daschel- senate floor
34 posted on 12/29/2003 10:44:52 AM PST by OXENinFLA (Yes, we're gonna have to go right to ludicrous speed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyObermann
Is this a vanity? A blog?
35 posted on 12/29/2003 10:48:31 AM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
My weekly vanity...
36 posted on 12/29/2003 2:50:24 PM PST by AndyObermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson