i'm truly sorry but REVISIONISM in regard to the WBTS period is the SOLE property of the LEFTISTS of DAMNyankee, elitist,northeastern/left coast academia.
southerners neither now, nor in the past, have been DUMB enough to believe that BILGE out of the "poison ivy league" & "berkley".
PITY that you don't know THAT much about REVISIONIST histioigraphy.
pardon me, but your hatefulness & ignorance of FACTS of the period is also showing;imVo, you've been LIED TO and "played for a fool", by lying academic LEFTISTS.
no matter how much you may wish to believe it, slavery was NEVER even a MAJOR cause of the WBTS, much less the ONLY main cause, as the DAMNyanklee/leftist/REVISIONISTS insist. that, frankly, is a KNOWING lie on THEIR part. (the REVISIONISTS "laugh behind their well-manicured hands" AT anyone, who is clueLESS enough to believe their KNOWING/arrogant lies.)
also, inasmuch as you choose NOT to say whether what was done in dixie, by "the filth that flowed down from the north", means that i have nothing more to say to you. those who are UNwilling or Unable to say whether CRIMES AGAINST PREACE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY & WAR CRIMES, of the sort ROUTINELY committed against POWs & innocent civilians in the south, are NOT "decent persons", imVho.
i'll thank you not to respond.
free dixie,sw
Can't take it can you? Facts are stubborn things.
Let's just review what you are afraid of:
1. The President and the Vice President of the Confederacy stated the Secession was about slavery. You did not and can not refute their statements. Would you like me to repeat that? Oh, well sure. The President and Vice President of the Confederacy stated the Secession was about SLAVERY. Until you admit it you are only lying to yourself.
2. You demand to treat the civil war like the here and now but then avoid the issue of slave reparations that would arise from that perspective.
3. You demand that this is a...LEFTIST DAMNYANKEE ELITIST NORTHEASTERN/LEFT COAST etc. etc. but cannot see that the Confederacy chose a system similar to the one they left but one based on protecting slavery.
4. You cannot and will not reference the 4 million slaves referred to in the speech because otherwise you would have to admit you are promoting their enslavement and the desire to have preserved that enslavement.
You throw out the "Revisionist" label but only YOU are the one revising history. It is why you CANNOT talk about the speeches. Otherwise you cannot promote your revisionism.
YOU ARE EXPOSED!
No wonder you don't want me to respond.