Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COEXERJ145
Given the current insanity on the Supreme Court, do we really want them taking any of these cases right now?

I would argue... yes. No government, once it has siezed a power, has ever given up that power without some drastic measures being taken. The Founders warned us of this. The last 70 years, from the Miller decision to the Brady Bill, has seen nothing but the incremental destruction or our Right. The only way to wake enough people up is a quick smack to the back of the head.

The wrong ruling from the Supremes could be just the "smack" we need.

28 posted on 01/15/2004 7:52:55 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse; harpseal; Squantos; Eaker; ExSoldier; Mulder; Ancesthntr; Jeff Head; Noumenon; ...
Walton ruled that the Second Amendment is not a broad-based right of gun ownership. "The Second Amendment does not confer an individual a right to possess firearms. Rather, the Amendment's objective is to ensure the vitality of state militias," Walton wrote.

There it is, in black and white.


31 posted on 01/15/2004 8:15:19 AM PST by Travis McGee ("That's not a line in the sand, that's a range marker." --Oleg Volk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson