To: Dead Corpse; harpseal; Squantos; Eaker; ExSoldier; Mulder; Ancesthntr; Jeff Head; Noumenon; ...
Walton ruled that the Second Amendment is not a broad-based right of gun ownership. "The Second Amendment does not confer an individual a right to possess firearms. Rather, the Amendment's objective is to ensure the vitality of state militias," Walton wrote. There it is, in black and white.
31 posted on
01/15/2004 8:15:19 AM PST by
Travis McGee
("That's not a line in the sand, that's a range marker." --Oleg Volk)
To: Travis McGee
Now we have two lower courts advocating the collective Right theory, and another espousing an individual Right along with the US Attourney General.
Is anyone optomistic about the USSC hearing this one and deciding in our favor? And I just don't mean the current make-up of the Bench. I mean AT ALL?
32 posted on
01/15/2004 8:28:56 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Travis McGee
Hardly a surprise for those of us who've paying atention. We'll this and many other questiosn over the course of the next American Civil War. Even a casual look at the level of vicious, irrational hate pouring out of the Left - which ratchets up, day by day - suggests that 2004 may be the year it starts.
BTW, which ZZ Top album is that photo from? 'Sharp Shooting Man'?
59 posted on
01/15/2004 9:34:08 AM PST by
Noumenon
(I don't have enough guns and ammo to start a war - but I do have enough to finish one.)
To: Travis McGee
There it is, in black and white. And on the other side is the Bill of Rights, also in black in white.
The train wreck is not far off.
113 posted on
01/15/2004 6:04:57 PM PST by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson