Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
The Supreme Court has not seemed anxious to take a Second Amendment case, and perhaps that is a good thing, given the present composition (pun intended) of the court.

That said, one of the traditional ways of getting the Supreme Court to take a case is to demonstrate that there is a "split in the circuits," i.e., one or more circuit courts has taken position X and one or more circuit courts has taken position Y, and X and Y are directly opposite positions. The Supreme Court is supposed to issue the definitive ruling in such situations.

We have a split in the circuits now on interpretation of the Second Amendment -- Fifth Circuit versus Ninth Circus. It is not strictly a numbers game, but if the DC Circuit could weigh in with the Fifth on the side of an individual right, that could be a big plus. The DC Circuit is well regarded and is often used as a parking lot for future Supreme Court justices. Their view on a subject such as this would be taken seriously.

45 posted on 01/15/2004 9:12:28 AM PST by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: blau993
We already tried that with Silveria V Lockyer. The USSC refused to hear it. It brought up just such an issue (9th V 5th).

As I keep maintaining, the system is irrevocably broken.

48 posted on 01/15/2004 9:15:55 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson