Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MASSIVE LAYOFFS AT KODAK
Rochester Democrat and Chronicle ^ | January 22, 2004 | Ben Rand

Posted on 01/22/2004 5:08:49 AM PST by 2banana

MASSIVE LAYOFFS AT KODAK

Number may reach 15,000 worldwide; local job losses uncertain

By Ben Rand Staff writer

PAULINA REID and KEVIN M. SMITH Eastman Kodak Co. said today that it will eliminate 12,000 to 15,000 jobs worldwide over the next three years because of accelerating declines in film sales and a need to be more aggressive in digital imaging. When the dust settles, the cuts likely will trigger an epic change in Rochester’s economic landscape as its share of the work force, historically the largest among local employers, continues to decline. [Day in Photos]

(January 22, 2004) — NEW YORK — Eastman Kodak Co. will eliminate 12,000 to 15,000 jobs worldwide over the next three years because of accelerating declines in film sales and a need to be more aggressive in digital imaging.

When the dust settles, the cuts could bring an epic change in Rochester’s economic landscape.

Kodak said it could not project how many of the cuts would take place in Rochester — but history and logic suggest it will be a high number since the region is home to Kodak’s largest manufacturing base. As a result, Kodak could surrender its title as the region’s largest employer — a designation the company has held longer than almost anyone can remember.

Job cuts at Kodak have a ripple effect on the area’s economy, cutting into everything from retail sales to capital investments to property taxes in the region.

“We understand this is going to be painful for everyone to go through, but if we don’t change, there is a bigger price to pay,” Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Daniel A. Carp said in an interview. Kodak released the news at 3 a.m. today.

In addition to cutting 20 percent to 25 percent of its global work force, Kodak will also drastically reduce its physical presence here and around the world.

The company expects to close or sell about a third of the square footage it now occupies for offices, manufacturing, research and other functions.

The new cutbacks are part of an increasingly historic shift in priorities at the company, known around the world for products that convert special moments into memories.

The cuts were to be announced this morning in New York City, where the company is discussing fourth-quarter and year-end financial results with investors and analysts.

Calculating in previously announced cuts, and assuming that any acquisitions Kodak makes would not dramatically increase the Rochester work force, local employment could fall to between 13,000 and 15,000 workers.

Kodak said the cuts were necessary to stay ahead of the biggest threat to the company in its history.

The growing popularity of digital cameras has triggered a permanent decline in sales of photographic film, Kodak’s marquee product.

“These plans are the consequence of market realities, and they will help us to fund a future for Kodak of sustainable, profitable growth,” said President and Chief Operating Officer Antonio Perez in a statement.

“They are absolutely required for Kodak to succeed in traditional markets as well as the digital markets to which our businesses are rapidly expanding.”

Kodak will use a combination of layoffs and early retirements worldwide to counter what is expected to be a precipitous drop in operating profit delivered from film.

An estimated 2,500 to 3,500 layoffs will take place worldwide in 2004.

The entire package of reductions will target manufacturing, corporate administration and portions of the company’s traditional photographic business, such as wholesale photofinishing.

The new reductions are on top of an already sizable package of layoffs announced last year.

The cuts should reduce costs $800 million to $1 billion a year by 2007, Kodak said.

The company will use that money to finance even more aggressive investments in such new opportunities as consumer digital photography, home inkjet printing, commercial printing, consumer electronics, radiology and more.

The new digital opportunities, Kodak says, will help build a company that is more successful and financially sound because it is less tied to the fortunes of a single product. Carp, in a statement, described the moment as “the dawning of a new, more competitive Kodak.”

Carp acknowledged the good news-bad news nature of the announcement for the Rochester work force. And on Wednesday night, he reaffirmed Kodak’s commitment to the region.

“We plan to be there a long time,” he said, “but Kodak will look different than it does today.”

Kodak’s accelerated strategy for digital imaging was initially announced in September.

Since then, the program has drawn fire from former employees, analysts and institutional investors.

Critics say the overall plan is risky and say it could lead Kodak into financial turmoil — perhaps even forcing the company to sell itself off in pieces.

Kodak Park is the company’s largest manufacturing site and is heavily vested in the production of film and traditional photographic products. It employs about 15,000 people and stretches across several miles of Rochester and Greece.

At the end of 2002, Kodak said it employed about 21,000 people in the Rochester area. In July, 2003, Kodak announced a round of 2,000 to 3,000 layoffs.

If just a third of the new cuts are local, Kodak’s Rochester work force would fall to between 13,000 and 15,000 people by 2007.

BRAND@DemocratandChronicle.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Officials' opinion The Democrat and Chronicle was unable to reach public officials for comment prior to press time, but here are comments made in previous reports: “While we may not be able to do anything to help Kodak as it continues to downsize and lay off people and do what it has to do to survive, we can create the business climate in this community so that when people do lose a job at Kodak, there is a better opportunity for them to be absorbed into a work force here.”

Maggie Brooks, now Monroe County executive Oct. 12

“At a time when Kodak is asking its workers to make sacrifices and this community to make sacrifices, it doesn't seem inconsistent to ask something of shareholders. It seems they are at least being even-handed at a difficult time. They could keep the dividend, but how would a worker feel if investors still were to make money when Kodak wasn't keeping resources.”

Assemblyman Joseph Morelle, D-Irondequoit Sept. 26, reacting to news of change in Kodak's business plan


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: kodak; layoffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last
Upstate NY is about to become an economic basketcase. Maybe Senator Clinton can do another listening tour up there (as she "rediscovers" upstate NY about every election cycle).
1 posted on 01/22/2004 5:08:49 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Kodak is shedding its film division. There's a declining demand for conventional film cameras as the picture quality of digital cameras keeps improving along with a lower price and more photo storage on compact flash disks.
2 posted on 01/22/2004 5:12:53 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Kodak and Polaroid made bad decisions at the start of the digital revolution and are now paying the price.
3 posted on 01/22/2004 5:14:00 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Yep. Polaroid stuck with instant film instead of forseeing where the next revolution in photography would emerge and filed for bankruptcy. Kodak is realizing that it has to get rid of the flab and fat to compete in the new fangled world of digital photography. Its not your grandfather's manual 35mm film camera business anymore.
4 posted on 01/22/2004 5:17:08 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Kodak is shedding its film division.

"Daddy, what is film?"

5 posted on 01/22/2004 5:20:43 AM PST by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
The local Agfa plant closed down last year. They made X-ray film.
6 posted on 01/22/2004 5:22:52 AM PST by snopercod (You know something is going on here, but you don't know what it is, do you Mr. Jones?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
"Kodak said it could not project how many of the cuts would take place in Rochester"

My guess is they are covering a move to 'offshore' - killing maybe 20,000 US jobs, while adding 3,000-5,000 in Mexico, China, or other low-wage location.

7 posted on 01/22/2004 5:23:15 AM PST by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
No one can blame Bush for this, though. No one rational, at least. It's actually the fault of companies that manufacture the new digital cameras that is killing old-fashioned film photography.

Swordsmiths went out of work when firearms became widespread, as did buggy-whip makers with automobiles.

Just wait for the economic calamity when they finally figure out how to construct molecular fabricators - IN THE FUTURE!

8 posted on 01/22/2004 5:24:05 AM PST by FierceDraka (Service and Glory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
President Bush should do something to protect these jobs. Maybe the federal government could start buying all the excess film.
9 posted on 01/22/2004 5:24:13 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
But...but...Hillary is the patron saint of Upstate. She wouldn't allow layoffs to occur. That's something Republicans do. Hillary will save them. She's helped save lots of jobs. Just ask her. Hillary....Oh, Hillary...
10 posted on 01/22/2004 5:25:45 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PMCarey
I haven't bought a roll of film in over a year. Using a digital camera is the way to go because you can take lots of hi res pictures and only print out the ones you want.
11 posted on 01/22/2004 5:26:39 AM PST by octobersky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Sad, but inevitable (and easily predictable) in the digital age.
12 posted on 01/22/2004 5:26:47 AM PST by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
This just in: Buggy whip industry in shambles! "What the heck just happened?" ask confused executives, after declining sales over the past half-century.

I can't ascribe to big-E Evolution, but it is clear at least that "survival of the fittest" is a viable and provable concept...

13 posted on 01/22/2004 5:28:58 AM PST by 50sDad (Hey Vegans! More people were killed this year by dirty onions than by Mad Cows!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka
Yeah, but Willie Green will try anyway......
14 posted on 01/22/2004 5:31:21 AM PST by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka
Just wait for the economic calamity when they finally figure out how to construct molecular fabricators - IN THE FUTURE!

I am still waiting for the cars with the gull-wing doors that as a child I was promised would be - IN THE FUTURE! And personal robots! And food pills! And vacation service to the moon! (And Woody Allen's Orgasmatron, for that matter!)

15 posted on 01/22/2004 5:31:55 AM PST by 50sDad (Hey Vegans! More people were killed this year by dirty onions than by Mad Cows!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
The local Agfa plant closed down last year. They made X-ray film.

Agfa, however, has expanded out into the digital radiology field. I can remember when they used to be into phototypesetting supplies, but they got out of that fairly quickly when phototypesetting became obsolete in the mid '90s.

16 posted on 01/22/2004 5:32:40 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Why did Kodak get rid of Ectar 25?
That stuff was unique.
It was something that Fuji, and Walmart, didn't have.
17 posted on 01/22/2004 5:34:30 AM PST by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
IMOP....poor business decisions and lousy foresight in the era of Dig Photo led to this and it could have been avoided/minimized somewhat by a gradual down sizing of the analog film side of the buis.......which will always be in demand by purist such as my self although I do prefer Ilford for my B&W and Fugi for my color(roll)Kodak for large format..My2cents
18 posted on 01/22/2004 5:35:44 AM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Kodak isn't only suffering from the competition of digital. They've been losing market share to Fuji film for a long time. Fuji is selling lots of film and, as far as I know, has no intention to scale back it's production.
19 posted on 01/22/2004 5:36:10 AM PST by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Wasn't Kodak the subject of conservative boycotts?

I remember something about them firing an employee because he refused to participate in Kodak's mandatory "Diversity Day" celebration.

Ever since then, they've been on my boycott list.
20 posted on 01/22/2004 5:36:21 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("By all that we hold dear on this Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson