[Angelica411]

The Florida Bar submits a letter repudiating Barry Krischer's bogus claim that he asked for and received their clearance before releasing Roy Black's correspondence and the Palm Beach SAO's response.

Further, the letter tends to indicate that the Bar made clear that the SAO could not release this correspondence. This is a direct contradiction to what Krischer and mouthpiece Edmonson have claimed.

Rush publishes the actual letter on his website!

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Btt.

[SandRat]

Trouble --- sounds like some one is going to be out of work and doing the "perp - walk," and it's not Rush!

[GeronL]

I see a $50 fine and 5-hours community service

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

These SOB's should be sued until the cows refuse to come home due to lack of food. Maybe after the local population has to ante up a multi-million dollar settlement they will be less forgiving of the Leftist dirtbags they constantly elect to public office. The mantra ought to be: "Elect a radical tax-and-spend Dim, pay an extra $25,000. Hope that's OK with you."

[soozla]

T-H-E BARRY KRISCHER?

[My Dog Likes Me]

Private medical records aside, I don't see how Rush can squirm out of these charges.

[CyberAnt]

This is such great news! I bet Hillary is having another screeming fit.

In case you haven't been informed .. the Cline's (maid and hubby) attorney is THE SON OF A CLINTON APPOINTEE!!

THIS IS NOT A COINCIDENCE. This is why the Clintons appointed these people .. so they could use them. But .. this ties the Clintons to this case. Of course, I always knew they were anyway.

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

I have no idea what any of this means. What letter from Black and all that? Not everyone is following every little speck of this story.

Maybe someone can do a 1. 2. 3. step by step for us slow folks who have kids and can't follow the Palm Beach soaps.

[greasepaint]

My opinion of the file, you linked, is different.
IMO, the key issue is wether the two documents
in question are 'public records'.
The ethics advice seemed to be ...that those two docs
are confidential, but IF they are 'public documents',
then public access laws trump confidentiality, but we don't give advice on those issues,
so you should consult a court.

[i get it]

The truth shall set you free.

[xm177e2]

The case against Rush Limbaugh is a violation of the First Amendment, plain and simple. If the prosecutors went after all accused drug addicts with the same zeal, it would be perfectly legitimate (at least as far as the 1stA is concerned) to persecute Rush equally harshly.

But that is not the case. The prosecutors are singling Rush out because of his political views, and courts have in the past found this to be illegal.

Add to this that the prosecution is apparently breaking all sorts of rules, and Rush could nail them pretty hard if he so chose (but I don't think he wants to take the risk of launching a counter-attack, he wants this issue to disappear)

[Born Conservative]

[dennisw]

I would never cute play games with Roy Black. He'll cut you up in court.

... Rush hired the best.

[Cubs Fan]

Time for an ethics complaint and a civil rights law suit.

[hattend]

bttt

[hattend]

bttt

[international american]

If you have to lie and do illegal things to make a case.....................you HAVE no case!!

[Lady Eileen]

bump..for Rush.

[holdonnow]

http://www.landmarklegal.org/tickerstory.cfm?webpage_id=568

http://www.landmarklegal.org/tickerstory.cfm?webpage_id=569

[technomage]

Hmmmmmmmmmmm.........

After reading through this thread (and others) it is quite apparent that the FINO's are alive and well.

FINO = Freeper In Name Only