Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is, no pun intended, a bombshell interview. Kay absolutely absolves the Bush administration of any intent to mislead the American people into war, paints Saddam as a highly dangerous man who was ardently seeking WMDs, and strongly backs the President's decision to go to war.

While only a relatively minor footnote, Lauer's supportive tone was almost as equally surprising. The rough transcript above doesn't do it complete justice. By his tone, and the way he set up the questions, it was clear that Lauer was helping position Kay to make his statements in support of the Bush administration.

If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show!

1 posted on 01/27/2004 5:24:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
Today Show ping.
2 posted on 01/27/2004 5:26:12 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Only one explanation, Lauer has been cloned by aliens.
3 posted on 01/27/2004 5:28:15 AM PST by 4CJ (||) Support free speech and stop CFR - visit www.ArmorforCongress.com (||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Hmm. Remarkable.

I've thought for some time now that the Rats would prefer we went to war against a nuclear and chemically armed country. Perhaps I was wrong and there is some sanity on the left after all.
4 posted on 01/27/2004 5:28:56 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest; hellinahandcart; Lil'freeper
Don't throw in the towel just yet.
5 posted on 01/27/2004 5:29:06 AM PST by sauropod (What happens at CPAC stays at CPAC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show!

I wouldn't hold my breath. I think Katie and Matt were just having an off day.

6 posted on 01/27/2004 5:30:03 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I have heard Kay speak.He said Bush just told him to search for the truth.Bush was misled as were the Brits,the French,the Germans,etc.Bad intel.

Good Morning.Thanks!
10 posted on 01/27/2004 5:30:48 AM PST by MEG33 (America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Bump! I don't suppose we will be hearing any of this on the cable networks. That's what the media does. They distort the original remarks of the person and then never correct it - even when the full transcript comes out. They do their initial damage and then they go silent. Happens every day. They know the public only hears the first headlines. It's dispicable.
12 posted on 01/27/2004 5:32:02 AM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show!

I just happened to turn on the Today show yesterday, and almost lost my breakfast when I sat the perky one.... She looks like she is always PO'ed about something

13 posted on 01/27/2004 5:32:39 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (WARNING! The dumbocRATs will self-destruct before the 04 elections!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I have to wonder if this wasn't a case of Lauer not doing his homework.

The liberal media is so liberal they've been ignoring reports out of England and elsewhere in which Kay made similar comments. Maybe Lauer was simply setting Kay up with softballs because he didn't realize that Kay was going to use them to defend the President and the war.
16 posted on 01/27/2004 5:33:00 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
if anyone was abused (by faulty intelligence) it was the President of the US rather than the other way around."

Given the atmosphere of the Intelligience community, one wonders if this was intentional.
17 posted on 01/27/2004 5:33:38 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thank you for the positively shocking report.
18 posted on 01/27/2004 5:33:41 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Lauer: "If you didn't find WMDs, does that mean they never existed, or could they have been moved prior to war?"

Kay: "We looked at that possibility but we didn't find evidence that there were large stockpiles prior to the war."

Why not ask the direct question? Is there any evidence of Saddam shipping his WMDs to Syria?

19 posted on 01/27/2004 5:33:52 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks for your report. It must be ratings. Katy & Matt are whores along with being flaming liberal partisans. I don't trust either of them.
23 posted on 01/27/2004 5:37:27 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"It was absolutely prudent to go to war. The system was collapsing, Iraq was a country with desire to develop WMDs, and it was attracting terrorists like flies to honey."

I don't suppose we'll see this quote in the New York Times.

24 posted on 01/27/2004 5:37:27 AM PST by toolbreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show!

No. Think of it this way: what candidates supported the war or voted in favor of action? Who would the Libs want to be able to "forgive" a vote if they can show he was misled (even to the point of saying Bush was also misled) to make that canadidate more palatable as the Dem Nominee?

Kerry

25 posted on 01/27/2004 5:37:28 AM PST by theDentist (Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
It's good that he has said these things. However since the left can't digest information in it's true form they will continue to spin that Bush intentionally led us into this war based on lies. Get ready for the big battle.
29 posted on 01/27/2004 5:41:17 AM PST by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks!
32 posted on 01/27/2004 5:43:55 AM PST by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
never underestimate the power of the halfwit liberal mind. ive allready seen comments in other forums that the white house had "gotten" to kay.
33 posted on 01/27/2004 5:44:59 AM PST by cripplecreek (.50 cal border fence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Excellent report. Thanks much.
34 posted on 01/27/2004 5:45:31 AM PST by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: windchime; prairiebreeze
FYI Ping
35 posted on 01/27/2004 5:45:36 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson