This is, no pun intended, a bombshell interview. Kay absolutely absolves the Bush administration of any intent to mislead the American people into war, paints Saddam as a highly dangerous man who was ardently seeking WMDs, and strongly backs the President's decision to go to war.
While only a relatively minor footnote, Lauer's supportive tone was almost as equally surprising. The rough transcript above doesn't do it complete justice. By his tone, and the way he set up the questions, it was clear that Lauer was helping position Kay to make his statements in support of the Bush administration.
If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
Today Show ping.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Only one explanation, Lauer has been cloned by aliens.
3 posted on
01/27/2004 5:28:15 AM PST by
4CJ
(||) Support free speech and stop CFR - visit www.ArmorforCongress.com (||)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Hmm. Remarkable.
I've thought for some time now that the Rats would prefer we went to war against a nuclear and chemically armed country. Perhaps I was wrong and there is some sanity on the left after all.
4 posted on
01/27/2004 5:28:56 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest; hellinahandcart; Lil'freeper
Don't throw in the towel just yet.
5 posted on
01/27/2004 5:29:06 AM PST by
sauropod
(What happens at CPAC stays at CPAC)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show! I wouldn't hold my breath. I think Katie and Matt were just having an off day.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I have heard Kay speak.He said Bush just told him to search for the truth.Bush was misled as were the Brits,the French,the Germans,etc.Bad intel.
Good Morning.Thanks!
10 posted on
01/27/2004 5:30:48 AM PST by
MEG33
(America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Bump! I don't suppose we will be hearing any of this on the cable networks. That's what the media does. They distort the original remarks of the person and then never correct it - even when the full transcript comes out. They do their initial damage and then they go silent. Happens every day. They know the public only hears the first headlines. It's dispicable.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show! I just happened to turn on the Today show yesterday, and almost lost my breakfast when I sat the perky one.... She looks like she is always PO'ed about something
13 posted on
01/27/2004 5:32:39 AM PST by
Arrowhead1952
(WARNING! The dumbocRATs will self-destruct before the 04 elections!!!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I have to wonder if this wasn't a case of Lauer not doing his homework.
The liberal media is so liberal they've been ignoring reports out of England and elsewhere in which Kay made similar comments. Maybe Lauer was simply setting Kay up with softballs because he didn't realize that Kay was going to use them to defend the President and the war.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
if anyone was abused (by faulty intelligence) it was the President of the US rather than the other way around."
Given the atmosphere of the Intelligience community, one wonders if this was intentional.
17 posted on
01/27/2004 5:33:38 AM PST by
Toespi
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thank you for the positively shocking report.
18 posted on
01/27/2004 5:33:41 AM PST by
Quilla
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Lauer: "If you didn't find WMDs, does that mean they never existed, or could they have been moved prior to war?" Kay: "We looked at that possibility but we didn't find evidence that there were large stockpiles prior to the war."
Why not ask the direct question? Is there any evidence of Saddam shipping his WMDs to Syria?
19 posted on
01/27/2004 5:33:52 AM PST by
McGruff
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks for your report. It must be ratings. Katy & Matt are whores along with being flaming liberal partisans. I don't trust either of them.
23 posted on
01/27/2004 5:37:27 AM PST by
Ditter
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"It was absolutely prudent to go to war. The system was collapsing, Iraq was a country with desire to develop WMDs, and it was attracting terrorists like flies to honey."I don't suppose we'll see this quote in the New York Times.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show! No. Think of it this way: what candidates supported the war or voted in favor of action? Who would the Libs want to be able to "forgive" a vote if they can show he was misled (even to the point of saying Bush was also misled) to make that canadidate more palatable as the Dem Nominee?
Kerry
25 posted on
01/27/2004 5:37:28 AM PST by
theDentist
(Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
It's good that he has said these things. However since the left can't digest information in it's true form they will continue to spin that Bush intentionally led us into this war based on lies. Get ready for the big battle.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks!
To: governsleastgovernsbest
never underestimate the power of the halfwit liberal mind. ive allready seen comments in other forums that the white house had "gotten" to kay.
33 posted on
01/27/2004 5:44:59 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(.50 cal border fence)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Excellent report. Thanks much.
34 posted on
01/27/2004 5:45:31 AM PST by
Paul_B
To: windchime; prairiebreeze
FYI Ping
35 posted on
01/27/2004 5:45:36 AM PST by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson