Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
I agree, and there were probably regular NG units that went...my point is that in my generation, when you mention the 60's and the NG....most think about not wanting to go to Nam.....I have no idea why Mr. Bush went into the ANG, and I would not speculate.
35 posted on 02/05/2004 9:26:35 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: stuartcr
If a newspaper produced four tons of material there are some folks who will dismiss it all as a Democratic plot. I'm always amazed at how belonging to a party means you MUST be a true believe and put aside anything damaging to your own case or candidate and put aside anything positive that applies to the other. People are FLAWED. It looks as if he, like many in that era, wanted to get out of Vietnam and got enrolled in the Guard with his Dad's help. He was not the only one who would have done that. But dimissing it all as a big Democratic plot is not the whole story: there are some real questions about his military service. I don't think it precludes him from re-election. But if we were so absolutely tough on Clinton why shouldn't we apply the same standards to President Bush...unless we only apply certain standards to the other side.
37 posted on 02/05/2004 9:33:33 AM PST by jraven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: stuartcr
If a newspaper produced four tons of material there are some folks who will dismiss it all as a Democratic plot. I'm always amazed at how belonging to a party means you MUST be a true believe and put aside anything damaging to your own case or candidate and put aside anything positive that applies to the other. People are FLAWED. It looks as if he, like many in that era, wanted to get out of Vietnam and got enrolled in the Guard with his Dad's help. He was not the only one who would have done that. But dimissing it all as a big Democratic plot is not the whole story: there are some real questions about his military service. I don't think it precludes him from re-election. But if we were so absolutely tough on Clinton why shouldn't we apply the same standards to President Bush...unless we only apply certain standards to the other side.
38 posted on 02/05/2004 9:33:41 AM PST by jraven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: stuartcr
There were no Army National Guard units that went. On the other hand many Army NG guys who missed enough meetings "went"!
41 posted on 02/05/2004 10:01:22 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson