Skip to comments.
Conservative Uprising Over Immigration
NewsMax ^
| 2/5/04
| Howard Kaloogian
Posted on 02/05/2004 2:58:10 PM PST by TatooChick
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Sabertooth; Map Kernow
heads up
41
posted on
02/05/2004 9:47:10 PM PST
by
Pelham
To: majhenrywest
Ping
42
posted on
02/05/2004 9:49:44 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: FairOpinion
I'm supporting Bill Jones, based primarily on Arnold's endorsement.
If Democrats can play the "electability" game with their primaries, then so can we.
43
posted on
02/05/2004 10:24:47 PM PST
by
counterpunch
(click my name to check out my 'toons!)
To: ETERNAL WARMING
This issue and Nafta will sink the Republican party. If Bush doesn't wise up and soon, he may be a war time president in a way he hadn't expected. We've been hit by the loss of the trade center, and our economy is being further attacked by a loss of jobs through Nafta and illegal immigration. Enough is enough.
44
posted on
02/05/2004 10:29:56 PM PST
by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
To: counterpunch
"If Democrats can play the "electability" game with their primaries, then so can we."
==
Exactly the point. I will vote for whoever had the best chance of beating Boxer.
But too many Republicans get caught up on the game of "principles" which leads nowhere, except to defeat.
Are the Democrats smarter than conservatives? It's high time, we start to focus on electability too.
45
posted on
02/05/2004 10:55:58 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: TatooChick
Howard Kaloogian is saying what President Bush should be saying. I'm sending Howard some money for his campaign.
46
posted on
02/05/2004 11:11:14 PM PST
by
janetgreen
(WANTED: A President Who Will Protect Our Borders From Invasion)
To: FairOpinion
47
posted on
02/06/2004 2:59:21 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(click my name to check out my 'toons!)
To: NormsRevenge
Hey Norm!
Ever think of becoming a political strategist? I like the way you think!
48
posted on
02/06/2004 9:52:23 AM PST
by
TatooChick
(Praise the Lord...and pass the ammunition)
To: TatooChick
LOL.. Thanks .. But Nobody could afford me! ;-]
49
posted on
02/06/2004 9:54:00 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi Mac ...... /~normsrevenge - FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info...)
To: winker
Y'all still live in Texas?
If you are here, please vote for Howard.
If you are there, PRAY for Howard.
Better still, PRAY and VOTE!
PS
My little sister just moved to Austin. She LOVES it there. Swears to heaven that God lives in Texas.
50
posted on
02/06/2004 9:55:39 AM PST
by
TatooChick
(Praise the Lord...and pass the ammunition)
To: goldstategop
I am sure he wouls appreciate your support!
Go Howard Go!!!!
51
posted on
02/06/2004 9:56:29 AM PST
by
TatooChick
(Praise the Lord...and pass the ammunition)
To: ETERNAL WARMING
Tancredo has already compromised and come out with his own guest worker program Seriously?
That bums me out. I thought he was going to stay strong on this one.
Guess we are back to McClintock/Kaloogian '08 !!!
52
posted on
02/06/2004 9:59:00 AM PST
by
TatooChick
(Praise the Lord...and pass the ammunition)
To: FairOpinion
Huh? Where is he attacking Bush? He mentions his support of Bush in terms of tax cuts ect ect. Or do you define an ememy of Bush as being anyone who posits legitimate criticism of Bush's immigration plan??
Also where are you coming up with the statement that if nominated, Howard will get creamed?? Due to polling data? Your scorning of recent polls that show Bush losing to Kerry is just as legitimate in Howard's case as well.
53
posted on
02/06/2004 10:01:43 AM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Principles, not blind loyalty)
To: KantianBurke
Bump What You Said! :-]
54
posted on
02/06/2004 10:03:58 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi Mac ...... /~normsrevenge - FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info...)
To: evilsmoker
Kaloogian isn't attacking Bush, he's trying to keep him from making a grave mistake. As many Conservatives are on this forum. Unfortunately, we are deemed persona non Grata by our fellow Freepers.
55
posted on
02/06/2004 10:06:15 AM PST
by
swampfox98
(Beyond 2004 - Chaos)
To: counterpunch
I'm supporting Bill Jones, based primarily on Arnold's endorsement. Great thinking.
Afterall, Arnold IS the benchmark of conservatism in California!
Please Counterpunch, say it ain't so!
56
posted on
02/06/2004 10:29:05 AM PST
by
TatooChick
(Praise the Lord...and pass the ammunition)
To: FairOpinion
But too many Republicans get caught up on the game of "principles" which leads nowhere, How odd that you are proud to sell your principles down river.
Thank God there are people who won't.
57
posted on
02/06/2004 10:32:47 AM PST
by
TatooChick
(Praise the Lord...and pass the ammunition)
To: Pelham
Thanks for the ping. The contemptuous, blase' reaction of GW and the powers-that-be at the GOP to the upswell of revulsion of Republican voters to this despicable, treasonous amnesty plan increasingly reminds me of the initial attitude of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette to the "events" of 1789 in Paris.
58
posted on
02/06/2004 10:44:11 AM PST
by
Map Kernow
("I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: null and void; .38sw; LisaAnne
Your thoughts?
59
posted on
02/06/2004 11:29:24 AM PST
by
sweetliberty
(To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
To: TatooChick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
