To: ovrtaxt
This is what leads to the logic of some (misguided, IMO) to suggest a Dem president might be good for the country, a 'pro gridlock' stance, if you will. If these idiots keep it up it won't be a democrat in the Whitehouse, it will be a democrat in the House Speaker role. It is Bush's coat tails that kept most of them in their seats in 2002.
To: Texasforever
If these idiots keep it up it won't be a democrat in the Whitehouse, it will be a democrat in the House Speaker role.Quote: Let them piss up a rope!
19 posted on
02/06/2004 2:05:51 AM PST by
.30Carbine
(This new conservatism stuff is one hell of a lot better than thinking)
To: Texasforever
It is Bush's coat tails that kept most of them in their seats in 2002.And Bush was farther right in 2002. Any way, this was a closed door meeting, so I don't have a problem with the disagreement. It's good that someone is listening, finally. The fact that the article was written, that it saw the light of day, is a message to conservatives. It gives me hope that the cause isn't lost.
20 posted on
02/06/2004 2:06:46 AM PST by
ovrtaxt
(Support Tarquin Fin-tim-lim-bim-lim-bin- bim-bus stop F'tang F'tang Olé Biscuitbarrel (Silly Party))
To: Texasforever
If these idiots keep it up
Which "idiots" -- the conservatives who want Bush to stop spending like a Democrat, or the Bush people who are spending like Democrats?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson