Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Liability Bill Falls in the Senate
C-Span

Posted on 03/02/2004 1:18:03 PM PST by brothers4thID

The Gun Manufacturers Liability Bill just failed by a vote of 8-90. Now there are no worries about the AWB (for now!).


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1805; awb; bang; banglist; gunscongresssenate; lawsuits; tortreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-252 next last
To: Texas Federalist
"Out of curiosity, does anyone know which, if any, states have passed gunmaker immunity legislation?"

http://www.firearmslawcenter.org/content/masterlist.asp#ImmunityStatute

101 posted on 03/02/2004 2:30:27 PM PST by FormerlyAnotherLurker (Barrett M82A1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
With regards to your question on were the Republican leadership is. That is simple they are still of the opinion that Democrats are a loyal opposition who love the Constitution. They also suffer from the idea that if they are nice to the talking heads & the democrats in the congress that they will be liked by these vermin .
102 posted on 03/02/2004 2:31:31 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner (.308 REACH OUT & THUMP SOMEONE .50BMG REACH OUT & CRUSH SOMEONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jf55510
There is a total lack of leadership in the Senate

Not entirely - the RATs controlled this little fiasco and played the Repubos like a fiddle - just like they have been doing since 2000. The Senate is George Bush' nemesis, and it will continue to be so unless the '04 elections sway the balance of power to the Repubos - which may not be too likely. One thing is certain -Frist needs to step down as majority leader.

103 posted on 03/02/2004 2:31:47 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The date on that entry is Nov. 2003. That was probably when they placed it on the scedule to be brought up this week.
104 posted on 03/02/2004 2:32:57 PM PST by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: deport
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 108th Congress - 2nd Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate

Vote Summary

Question: On Passage of the Bill (S. 1805 as amended )
Vote Number: 30 Vote Date: March 2, 2004, 03:51 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Bill Defeated
Measure Number: S. 1805 (Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act )
Measure Title: A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by others.
Vote Counts: YEAs 8
NAYs 90
Not Voting 2
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State

Alphabetical by Senator Name

Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Alexander (R-TN), Nay
Allard (R-CO), Nay
Allen (R-VA), Nay
Baucus (D-MT), Nay
Bayh (D-IN), Nay
Bennett (R-UT), Nay
Biden (D-DE), Nay
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Bond (R-MO), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Brownback (R-KS), Nay
Bunning (R-KY), Nay
Burns (R-MT), Nay
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Campbell (R-CO), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
Carper (D-DE), Nay
Chafee (R-RI), Nay
Chambliss (R-GA), Nay
Clinton (D-NY), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Nay
Coleman (R-MN), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Corzine (D-NJ), Nay
Craig (R-ID), Nay
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dayton (D-MN), Nay
DeWine (R-OH), Nay
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Dole (R-NC), Nay
Domenici (R-NM), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Nay
Edwards (D-NC), Not Voting
Ensign (R-NV), Nay
Enzi (R-WY), Nay
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Fitzgerald (R-IL), Nay
Frist (R-TN), Nay
Graham (D-FL), Nay
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
Gregg (R-NH), Nay
Hagel (R-NE), Nay
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Hollings (D-SC), Nay
Hutchison (R-TX), Nay
Inhofe (R-OK), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Jeffords (I-VT), Nay
Johnson (D-SD), Not Voting
Kennedy (D-MA), Nay
Kerry (D-MA), Nay
Kohl (D-WI), Nay
Kyl (R-AZ), Nay
Landrieu (D-LA), Nay
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Nay
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Miller (D-GA), Nay
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Nelson (D-FL), Nay
Nelson (D-NE), Nay
Nickles (R-OK), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Roberts (R-KS), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Santorum (R-PA), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Smith (R-OR), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Nay
Specter (R-PA), Nay
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Stevens (R-AK), Nay
Sununu (R-NH), Nay
Talent (R-MO), Nay
Thomas (R-WY), Nay
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Nay
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State

Grouped By Vote Position

YEAs ---8
Breaux (D-LA)
Daschle (D-SD)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
Pryor (D-AR)
Voinovich (R-OH)
NAYs ---90
Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Byrd (D-WV)
Campbell (R-CO)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
Dayton (D-MN)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Fitzgerald (R-IL)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (D-FL)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hollings (D-SC)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lott (R-MS)
McConnell (R-KY)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Miller (D-GA)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Nickles (R-OK)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Warner (R-VA)
Wyden (D-OR)
Not Voting - 2
Edwards (D-NC)
Johnson (D-SD)
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State

105 posted on 03/02/2004 2:33:05 PM PST by deport (For Sale: Iraqi rifle, never fired, dropped once)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
That guy just looks like a snake in the grass!
106 posted on 03/02/2004 2:33:43 PM PST by BobinIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
You have to give the statist left credit for one thing: they are incredibly tenacious.

Evil never sleeps.

107 posted on 03/02/2004 2:34:17 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: deport
Thanks for the info: Luger, McCain and Voinovich . . . I could have guessed.
108 posted on 03/02/2004 2:34:54 PM PST by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
No just get ready to listen to complaints about how Bush has turned his back on gun owners, on the Constitution, on blah, blah, blah. His enemies are never satisfied.
109 posted on 03/02/2004 2:35:52 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: deport
McCain and Daschle on the same side yet again, how poetic.
110 posted on 03/02/2004 2:36:11 PM PST by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Yes, Monty. They really, really want the AWB extension, and more. They want an all out ban on semi's.
111 posted on 03/02/2004 2:36:45 PM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
You must be laboring under the delusion that these lawsuits have been effective against manufacturers. They haven't. RATS just delayed making it almost impossible but have not "won" anything. Two more RAT Senator losses and the amendments will not pass. Fitzdumbass will not return from Il. so his replacement could be more reliable on this issue.
112 posted on 03/02/2004 2:39:23 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
here's a link to a reliable nooz source...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,113046,00.html

113 posted on 03/02/2004 2:41:44 PM PST by Andonius_99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
The AWB does not "sunset" until September 04..

The amendment to S.1805 does place the continuance of the AWB in jeapordy, but a seperate bill to extend AWB could still be introduced..
Additionally, a new AWB (with expanded powers) could still be introduced between now and Sept. 04..

Just something to consider..

114 posted on 03/02/2004 2:43:05 PM PST by Drammach ("Have a Good Day, in a Free America")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: deport; Flyer; dix; Eaker; humblegunner; bobbyd; Allegra; Xenalyte; pax_et_bonum; TheMom; ...
You know, I am just floored by this...

Why would you go to the trouble of attaching an amendment to a bill, get it approved...The entire bill goes to a vote, then vote against the whole thing???

Maybe I am not seeing it, but this is not making a bit of sense...

But I see that the 8 Senators who did vote for this as a whole, are probably going to be long gone come November, we can only hope...

Something smells really bad here...I am wondering are we going to be in for a surprise here somewhere down the road before September 13th, at midnight???

Later,
Steve
115 posted on 03/02/2004 2:43:59 PM PST by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID
I don't agree .. I think it was a set-up by the repubs.

The repubs wanted a clean bill. First they had to kill the bill with the amendments. They did! Now they can start over with a clean bill - after the November elections, when they can get it through the senate - clean!!

The rats think they defeated us - when in reality I believe the repubs have just pulled off a coup against the dems.

And .. the repubs have put the dems ON THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD FOR BEING AGAINST UNFAIR GUN LAWSUITS, and voting against the bill they had loaded with amendments. This is just too cool.
116 posted on 03/02/2004 2:44:36 PM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
Yep. Hasn't come up yet for consideration on the floor.
117 posted on 03/02/2004 2:45:50 PM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
You are right the House bill passed without all that crap.
118 posted on 03/02/2004 2:47:17 PM PST by pro2A Mom (http://www.2asisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Illinois is dominated by Chiagao and its suburbs.

Fitzgerald will probably be replaced by a RAT. No net loss on 2A, but a loss on judges.

GOP needs to sweep the seats in the South (FL, NC, SC, GA, and LA) to ensure this bill can pass without poison pills. I also think Daschle is going to have some trouble. Yeah, he co-sponsored, but he tried to have it both ways.

The other lesson is NOT to let thrid-party types draw you away. Slade Gorton was reliably pro-gun, but Maria Cantwell beat him because too many folks decided Gorton wasn't "principled" enough and went third-party in 2000. I'd rather have Ensign defending a seat this year as opposed to doing so in 2006 due to third-party votes as well. And there is the issue of John Thune vs. Tim Johnson in 2002.

Think it over, folks.
119 posted on 03/02/2004 2:47:42 PM PST by hchutch (Why did the Nazgul bother running from Arwen's flash flood? They only managed to die tired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64
---Maybe I am not seeing it, but this is not making a bit of sense... ---

I'm with you! All I can figure is that each honorable lunkerhead can now go tell their constituents that they voted such and such. Many of them will be able to tell one group that they were for and another group that they were against.
120 posted on 03/02/2004 2:49:16 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson