Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The discovery is not, however, considered the long-sought "smoking gun" of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Somebody kick me.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; LindaSOG; Radix; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; ...
Smoking gun ping.
4 posted on
03/09/2004 1:11:55 PM PST by
Arrowhead1952
(John f'ing Kerry has been undermining the morale of American servicemen since 1970.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Dan Rather? Tom Brokaw? Chris Matthews? Aaron Brown? Where are you?
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
NewsMax again....ho hum.
7 posted on
03/09/2004 1:13:21 PM PST by
zarf
(..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Bttt
8 posted on
03/09/2004 1:13:38 PM PST by
DoctorMichael
(What the %$#&!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If this isn't a "smoking gun" then guns don't smoke.
9 posted on
03/09/2004 1:14:44 PM PST by
jwalsh07
(We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
*BUMP*!
11 posted on
03/09/2004 1:16:57 PM PST by
ex-Texan
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
DU is somewhat radioactive and is uranium. If the missles contain DU (depleted Uranium) then they are little different than the tank buster rounds that the A-10 spits out. Now if they find plutonium?
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
America has WMD. We just don't bury them in the desert. If Iraq was not hiding their WMD, why do they keep turning up buried?
13 posted on
03/09/2004 1:18:18 PM PST by
Pan_Yans Wife
(The soul unfolds itself, like a lotus of countless petals. --- Kahlil Gibran)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
But . . . but . . . but they were just intended for peaceful purposes!
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I imagine the uranium in question is unenriched at worst,
DU being far more likely. Not much of an issue here, lots
of stuff in military use can be toxic if handled incorrectly.
19 posted on
03/09/2004 1:20:15 PM PST by
Saturnalia
(My name is Matt Foley and I live in a VAN down by the RIVER.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Not a dirty bomb. More like a nail bomb.
21 posted on
03/09/2004 1:20:43 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
!!
23 posted on
03/09/2004 1:20:46 PM PST by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Well well well .. the search for the smoking gun has turned up the 'glowing gun'.
Wasn't Sen. Highball .. oops I mean Kennedy ... actually mocking VP Cheney this weekend for suggesting that the weapons search was as yet incomplete? Go get em Dick!
28 posted on
03/09/2004 1:27:27 PM PST by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Depleted Uranium Fragmentation warhead.
Gotta be careful with it, but it's not designed as a NBC weapon.
31 posted on
03/09/2004 1:35:46 PM PST by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It looks like the "real thing"; it smells like the "real thing"; it KILLS like the "real thing."
32 posted on
03/09/2004 1:37:05 PM PST by
Use It Or Lose It
( You've got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
One must always consider the source when dealing with "NewsMax". US Army magnetic lensatic compasses always had a "radiation" warning on the back (i.e. "don't remove the back cover") since they contained a small amount of radioactive material to illuminate the needle and the compass headings on the dial. If the nuclear material in these missiles was enriched or easily reprocessed, Saddam would have had his bomb ahead of schedule. Doubt that this was the case, however.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The discovery is not, however, considered the long-sought "smoking gun" of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Maybe .. but I'm going take a guess and say that Saddam wasn't suppose to have them
38 posted on
03/09/2004 1:52:03 PM PST by
Mo1
(Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The left has been upset for years over our use of depleted uranium ordnance during the first Gulf War, citing all sorts of environmental damage, and health risks to anyone in the area. Now, it seems that Saddam had similar weapons and may have used them in that war. Somehow, I have the feeling that all the blame will forever be pointed directly at the US, and not one word will ever be uttered against Saddam.
39 posted on
03/09/2004 1:52:19 PM PST by
Fresh Wind
(Who would a terrorist vote for?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
