No? let's see...
“and a little blond, blue-eyed Scandanavian girl... part of your Vast jpeg collection I presume”
Innuendo is a very subjective thing, current legal interpretations on the subject indicate the offense taken is the deciding criteria, stumbling around an excuse will not negate the crime.
“there was a flaw in your "Hispanics aren't White" thesis “
Well, no they are not. I detect no other take on your statements other than you believe they are “white.” Caucasian perhaps? Your command of the English language indicates you SEEM to be capable of a rational thought, perhaps you can explain a somewhat more base example of your apparent concept....
Are the same as . . .
Perhaps you can justify my understanding of your point by saying both items begin with the letter "B?"
Or is it both items would cause pain if you got hit with one?
How about both items can be thrown a reasonable distance? No?
How about what you and others here are just hopping from one foot to another in anticipation of "proving" is that through some convoluted sequence of "logic" two different things are the same because they share some common traits?
suggests that your screen name should be an acronym for "too little intelligence."
Too little intelligence . . humm... personal attack. That should be beneath you, however, your words seem to speak for themselves.
You might have run across something called a globe or an atlas at some point during your six or more years of high school. Had you paid attention in class, you might have learned that the settlers who colonized what is now called North America came from Western Europe and that the settlers who colonized what is today called South America also came from Western Europe.
Sooooo, what you are stating is the North America and South America (including Central America?) were devoid of human existence till the “Europeans” moved in? This will be BIG news to historians. Those folks seem to have this absurd notion that there was a native population present. In rather large numbers. Glad to have you clear that up.
The Rita Hayworth photo should have provided another another clue. It's a simple enough matter to verify that she was Hispanic. Try asking around if you still aren't sure she was "white."
I have read this one several times. . Nothing. . . It just does not make sense. Are you stating she is “hispanic?” Others here indicate there is no such thing, Some describe it using several different terms. You state she is hispanic, and then you seem to assure me she was “white” and I can just ask anyone. Who am I supposed to ask?
As to the second photo, I'm glad you brought that up because I forgot to include the following important disclaimer: any resemblance to persons posting on this thread is coincidence. Glad I was able to point that out. I wouldn't want anyone accusing me of posting information about another poster's identity.
Yet another personal attack. Wipe that smile off you face mister, everyone knows exactly what you meant. Shortcut to thinking dude. Typical when the reasoning process runs out of options. I suppose you will feign innocence on that as well. Too many trips to the well bud, you are not impressing me.
Now, I see lots of words and you still have not proved your point. Heck, you haven't even clearly stated what it is, other than an obsession to insult me for stating a very simple fact. Let me hazard a guess. Some mindset you seem to posses encourages you to proclaim that what is commonly recognized as “hispanic” is in fact what is commonly thought of as “white.” Is THAT the cause you are trying to champion? If so, say so. An indefensible position is in itself somewhat akin to insanity but most here in the u.S. still root for the underdog. Not a good move but you are so committed to something, (we are still waiting for you to say clearly what it is) it is far too late to back off now.
Besides, you probably moved since that photo was taken. ;-)
Nice try, but I don't drink beer.
