To: OutInTheColdAgain
No, he just sat under a tree and decided to become enlightened. (After decades of trying to do it the hardway - fasting, meditation, mortifying the flesh, hedonism, etc.)
34 posted on
04/07/2004 12:56:38 AM PDT by
null and void
(John f'ing Kerry - More positions than the Kama Sutra...)
To: null and void
okay I got what you mean about Buddhism. You explained it very well. Nice short and simple. He sat under a tree one day and was enlightened. Everyone else who follows Buddhism is reaching for enlightenment. As far as religion goes it doesn't seem that much more bizarre than religions who accept angles descending to earth and talking to us. Actually Buddhism makes more sense to me as a religion than Scientology, no offense intended. Scientology still seems to me to be psychology disguised as religion. I would have to learn more about it to dismiss my initial reaction.
To: null and void
That's a Pippala tree according Tibetan tradition. Had he sat under an apple tree, he might have acquired gravitas rather than enlightment.
71 posted on
04/07/2004 10:48:00 AM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson