Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/14/2004 1:53:29 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dead
(prior to Ashcroft defending himself, the hearings were non-partisan)

I do not agree. They were biased right out of the gate!
2 posted on 04/14/2004 1:54:58 PM PDT by GottaLuvAkitas1 (Let's turn Iraqi sand into some useful glass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
this was something Bush should have done at least night's press conference - the first side to declare the commission partisan, gets to keep that position. Our side failed to make the claim, even though we know it has been partisan against Bush, so now the Dems will make the claim.
3 posted on 04/14/2004 1:56:32 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Hey dead...check these stories out:

Yes, Clinton and Gore did abandon airport security planning for sake of campaign cash. But worse, they concealed the real cause of the crash, in no small part to justify that abandonment.

In fact, on the same day in September of 1996 that Al Gore sent the airline's lobbyist a letter signaling his intent to roll over, the National Transportation Safety Board reversed its spin and all but ruled out a bomb or missile strike [on TWA 800].

WND

In our book, "First Strike," James Sanders and I make this arguably prophetic comment:

John Kerry seemed to have his sights on Al Gore's Achilles' heel. After the events of Sept. 11, the story of how Al Gore helped subvert the investigation into TWA 800 and undermine airport security may yet prove to be a career-killer. Kerry's "slips" may have put Gore out of the race even before he got in.

Two weeks after advanced copies of "First Strike" started circulating around Washington, Gore withdrew from the presidential race. His withdrawal shocked Washington. It did not shock Sanders and me. We expected it. Kerry plays hardball, too.

While I have your attention, Chris, there is one other person you need to put on the spot. Her name is Jamie Gorelick, former deputy attorney general under the figurehead, Janet Reno. You probably know her. Last week, UPI reported that the high-level 9-11 panel on which she sits "was rocked Thursday by the bizarre revelation that two of its senior officials were so closely involved in the events they are investigating that they have had to be interviewed as part of the inquiry." One of the two was Gorelick.

WND

On Aug. 22, 1996, just a few days before the start of the Democratic National Convention, Ms. Gorelick oversaw a critical Justice Department meeting with the FBI. Immediately after this meeting, as it happened, all serious inquiry into the fate of TWA 800 came to an end.

On the next day, for instance, the FAA began to inquire whether any dog-training exercises had ever taken place on the plane that would become TWA 800. On the same day, as CNN reported, the FBI now claimed publicly for the first time that the explosive residue found along the right wing "could have been brought on the plane by a passenger and was not part of a bomb." Likewise, after the meeting, the FBI would do no more eyewitness interviews, at least not for the next two months. The Bureau only did a handful after that – and all of those for the wrong reasons.

WND

So Gore and Gorelick are in collusion?

4 posted on 04/14/2004 1:58:58 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
It seems the Bush Administration and the GOP congressional leadership made poor selections with respect to the Republican appointees on this commission. It has become a Democratic star chamber, amazing when you consider that the GOP controls the White House and both houses of Congress. Neither Rice nor Ashcroft should have been put on the spot (not that they didn't handle themselves well). Rather, a strong GOP leader should have put snakes like Ben Veniste and Gorelick in their place.
5 posted on 04/14/2004 2:02:58 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead; All
Cross-link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1117579/posts
GORELICK GATE: Developing...
various FR links | 04-14-04 | The Heavy Equipment Guy
6 posted on 04/14/2004 2:03:11 PM PDT by backhoe (The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
From Reno:Earlier in the day, Janet Reno, Clinton’s attorney general, contradicted this, saying, "There are simply no walls or restrictions on sharing" information.

However we have a Memo here:

Procedures for Contacts Procedures for Contacts Between the FBI & CIA Investigations

Actually it is the part that of the FBI ...the FCI.... that does talk to the CIA I believe..

9 posted on 04/14/2004 2:19:22 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
LOL!
10 posted on 04/14/2004 2:22:31 PM PDT by Huck (In the Soviet Union, the Admin Moderators ruled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
No media bias there. *rolls eyes*
11 posted on 04/14/2004 2:22:52 PM PDT by GeronL (Dr. Pepper Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Hahahahahahaha!
14 posted on 04/14/2004 2:31:43 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
"Questioned about why he changed from commercial to government jets in summer of 2001, Ashcroft said the decision was taken on advice of his personal security team and "related to maintenance of arms," among other things. It was not related to any terrorist threat, he said."

WOW! Apparently they missed the part were he plainly stated that on September 3rd...a week before the attack, he had taken a commercial jet to DC...or that his wife (and he) used them all summer long, like on her trip to Germany. Lies by ommission are still lies.
15 posted on 04/14/2004 2:32:48 PM PDT by cwb (Kerry: Sadr is a legitimate voice in Iraq being silenced by America..and Hamas are sorta terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Questioned about why he changed from commercial to government jets in summer of 2001, Ashcroft said the decision was taken on advice of his personal security team and "related to maintenance of arms," among other things. It was not related to any terrorist threat, he said.

This is nothing but a "drive-by journalism" hitpiece by NewsCrack* dealer James Ridgeway.

*NewsCrack: soundbites from the Liberal News Ghetto. These are similar to five-dollar rocks of crack cocaine, and the habitual consumer eventually ends up broken and destitute, lying on a dirty mattress at DU.

18 posted on 04/14/2004 2:59:41 PM PDT by an amused spectator (FR: Leaving the burning dog poop bag of Truth on the front door step of the liberal media since 1996)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson