Jamie Gorelick Authored Conflict of Interest Booklet

[mass55th]

In 1989, Jamie Gorelick authored a 21 page booklet for The American Bar Association titled: "Conflicts of Interest in a Changing Legal Environment : Traps for the Unwary."

Also in 1989, she co-authored "Destruction of Evidence" with Stephen Marzen and Lawrence Solum. Published in New York: Wiley Law Publications, Description: xxvii, 516 p. ; 27 cm. Series: Trial practice library.

And again in 1989, she authored a 26 pages booklet for The American Bar Association titled: "Structuring the Internal Investigation When a Corporation is Faced With Parallel Civil, Criminal and Administrative Proceedings."

In 1988, for The American Bar Association, she authored a 41 page booklet: "Effective Representation of the Corporation, Its Directors, Officers, and Employees in Grand Jury and Agency Investigations. 

In 1987, she co-authored a two volume book with Roger C Spaeder & Cono R Namorato: "Federal Enforcement 1987 : Representing Corporations, Their Officers, Directors and Employees, April 2-3, 1987, Loew's L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, Washington, D.C.: program materials. Published by The Center, Washington, D.C.

Then, in 2001, the Department of Justice published a volume of her addresses as Assistant Attorney General.

 

[mass55th]

I particularly like the "Conflict of Interest" booklet. Leave it to Gorelick to have written a booklet on the exact issue she is guilty of.

[Bigg Red]

...the exact issue she is guilty of

Seems to be her strength. So Clintonian -- accuse others of doing what you yourself are actually guilty of.

Good catch, BTW

[Bigg Red]

ping

[jmstein7]

BUMP!

[MizSterious]

Interesting. Are any of these on the internet somewhere? I'd especially like to see "Destruction of Evidence"--it, too, seems so typical of how Clinton ran things.

[coloradan]

Conflict of Interest: A How-To Manual, by Jamie Gorelick

Destruction of Evidence: A How-To Manual, by Jamie Gorelick

[backhoe]

Cross-linked:

-GORELICK GATE: Developing--

[Diogenesis]

Evidence? You want evidence

The organization and conduct of, and coverup by, this committee is
more than enough insight and evidence into EXACTLY
how we in America became vulnerable to the 911 Atrocities by al Qaeda.

Disgraced Commissioner Kean: "Ms Gorelick is one of the finest members
of the commission and one of the most bipartisan members.
People ought to stay out of our business."

[PISANO]

A new book, "The Sanctity of the Oval Office" (A personal experience..)is due out shortly, written by William Jefferson Clinton.

[demkicker]

I particularly like the "Conflict of Interest" booklet. Leave it to Gorelick to have written a booklet on the exact issue she is guilty of.

We're living in an upsidedown world where nothing makes sense anymore. Shame no longer exists, thanks to the father of "I'm Okay, You're Okay and everything's Okay", Phil Donohue. My, we've come a long way down the road to destruction.

There needs to be a line drawn drawn in the sand with Gorelick. IMO, if conservatives don't throw an absolute fit and raise hell to get that b*tch off of the 9/11 commission, the dems win in a BIG way. They know that conservatives by nature "tolerate" things they don't agree with because its too much trouble to "rock the boat".

It's time, folks, to not only rock the boat, but sink the sonofabitch!

[Diogenesis]

[11th Earl of Mar]

Also in 1989, she co-authored "Destruction of Evidence"<

No wonder Janet and Bill picked her to be #2 at DOJ.

[Diogenesis]

Also in 1989, she (Jamie Gorelick) co-authored "Destruction of Evidence"

No wonder Janet and Bill picked her to be #2 at DOJ.

This latest revelation boggles the mind.

[joinedafterattack]

We need to get a copy of this booklet and see if she met her own printed standards

[MamaLucci]

That's rich.....she "literally wrote the book"....
well, she certainly IS an expert when it comes to conflicts of interest.

Yet another Gorelick conflict

[MamaLucci]

I agree with you, this MUST NOT stand.

[Spunky]

I don't think I will be buying this book.

604. Amazon.com's Price: $170.00 Prices subject to change.Destruction of Evidence, 2002 by: Jamie Gorelick, Stephen Marzen, Lawrence Solum, Aspen Publishers November, 2001

[skinkinthegrass]

I particularly like the "Conflict of Interest" booklet. Leave it to Gorelick to have written a booklet on the exact issue she is guilty of.

Hmmm...It figures, $hrillarys' Lackey writes ALL these articles and books about about "Proper Legal procedures/ethics"...and doesn't follow them herself, typical Clinton behavior....all that's missing, are the murders/"rub-outs".

[rj45mis]

Dio, you must have amazing sources for obtaining pics, etc. I appreciate your presence on FR.

[Baynative]

Seeing the Clintons in action,it became appearant the RDDB lawyers study law, not to preserve and protect it but,to engage in deconstructing it from within. Observe a list of "Loi-YAHS close to the Clintons:

Sid Blumenthal
David Kendall
David Boies
Lanny Davis
Rahm Imanuel
Susan Estrich
Harold Ickes
Bernard Nussbaum
Abbe Lowell
Bruce Lindsey
John Podesta
Web Hubbel
"Mack" McLarty
Vernon Jordan
Ruth Bader-Ginzberg
Richard Ben-Veniste
Jamie Gorelick
Beth Nolan
Janet Reno...and many, many more.

It is also interesting to note that as we watch the 9/11 commission waste millions of dollars on a political sham, FReepers have uncovered far more factual analytical and FACTUAL evidence FOR FREE!

[mass55th]

I'm not sure if any of these are available online. I discovered them when I did a search in the OCLC First Search/World Catalog database through my state library that I have online access to.

[NonValueAdded]

This just keeps getting better and better.

[PISANO]

Another great article by Andrew McCarthy is HERE.

[Spunky]

Looks like this book is used a lot by the courts.

Destruction of Evidence has been cited by the numerous federal courts including the United States Courts of Appeal for the Second Circuit, Third Circuit, Fifth Circuit, Eighth Circuit, and District of Columbia Circuit, and by the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Arkansas, the District of Colorado, the District of the District of Columbia, the District of Maryland, the District of Massachusetts, the District of Minnesota, the District of New Jersey, the Eastern District of New York, the Northern District of Oklahoma, and Eastern District of Pennsylvania as well as several state courts including the Supreme Courts of Alaska, Missouri, New Hampshire, and Texas and the Florida District Court of Appeal, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, and the Pennsylvania Superior Court.  The companion article, Truth and Uncertainty: Legal Control of the Destruction of Evidence has been cited by United States Court of Appeal for the Seventh Circuit, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the Supreme Courts of Alaska, New Jersey, and New Mexico, as well as the California Court of Appeal, Louisiana Court of Appeal, and the New Jersey Superior Court.

Curriculum Vitae

[hoosiermama]

Like all good liberal she thinks that since she has studies the subject, she now knows where the loop holes are and she can "get around" the laws.. After all the laws weren't written for liberals....they judicate their own.

[Spunky]

Looks like this book is used a lot by the courts.

Destruction of Evidence has been cited by the numerous federal courts including the United States Courts of Appeal for the Second Circuit, Third Circuit, Fifth Circuit, Eighth Circuit, and District of Columbia Circuit, and by the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Arkansas, the District of Colorado, the District of the District of Columbia, the District of Maryland, the District of Massachusetts, the District of Minnesota, the District of New Jersey, the Eastern District of New York, the Northern District of Oklahoma, and Eastern District of Pennsylvania as well as several state courts including the Supreme Courts of Alaska, Missouri, New Hampshire, and Texas and the Florida District Court of Appeal, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, and the Pennsylvania Superior Court.  The companion article, Truth and Uncertainty: Legal Control of the Destruction of Evidence has been cited by United States Court of Appeal for the Seventh Circuit, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the Supreme Courts of Alaska, New Jersey, and New Mexico, as well as the California Court of Appeal, Louisiana Court of Appeal, and the New Jersey Superior Court.

Curriculum Vitae

[mass55th]

Supposedly 281 libraries hold the Destruction of Evidence publication. Here's a list of the New York libraries that has it:

ALBANY LAW SCH YZA  

NY BROOKLYN LAW SCH ZBL  

NY CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT, NEW YORK ZWT  

NY CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTON, NY CGQ  

NY COLUMBIA UNIV ZCL  

NY CUNY, LAW SCH LIBR XQL  

NY DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON, NEW YORK ZDP  

NY EMPIRE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ZBC  

NY FORDHAM UNIV, LAW LIBR ZYF  

NY FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & JAC LLP FFH  

NY HOBART & WILLIAM SMITH COL ZEM  

NY JOHN JAY COL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE LIBR VVJ  

NY LATHAM & WATKINS, NEW YORK LWN  

NY LONG ISLAND UNIV, C W POST CAM VXX  

NY NEW YORK STATE APPELLATE DIV, LAW LIBR VRT  

NY  NEW YORK STATE LIBR NYG  

NY NEW YORK UNIV LAW SCH LIBR YLS  

NY NIXON PEABODY LLP ZNH  

NY SAINT JOHN'S UNIV, LAW LIBR ZSL  

NY SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL, LIBR SZA  

NY SKADDEN ARPS LAW LIBR, NEW YORK XSA  

NY SUNY AT BUFFALO, LAW LIBR SBL  

NY SUPREME COURT LAW LIBR, BROOKLYN XXB   NY SUPREME COURT LAW LIBR, ELMIRA YUN  

NY SUPREME COURT LAW LIBR, NASSAU CNTY YBY  

NY SUPREME COURT LAW LIBR, UTICA ZUM  

NY SUPREME COURT LIBR, BINGHAMTON YSF  

NY SYRACUSE UNIV SYB  

NY SYRACUSE UNIV COL OF LAW BARCLAY LIBR SYL  

NY US COURT OF APPEALS LIBR, 2ND CIRCUIT UCN  

NY YESHIVA UNIV

[Diogenesis]

"Darn. If we had a copy of "Destruction of Evidence"
we NEVER would have gotten fired."

[mass55th]

There are five libraries listed as holding the Conflict of Interest booklet:

SKADDEN ARPS LAW LIBR, NEW YORK XSA  

DC GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV, LAW LIBR GWL  

DC HOGAN & HARTSON, LAW LIBR HHS  

GA ALSTON & BIRD LIBR GBG  

MA NEW ENGLAND SCH OF LAW LIBR NLL  

[Diogenesis]

Good luck. They may go the way of Hillary's Wellesley thesis.

[M. Thatcher]

I did a search in the OCLC First Search/World Catalog database through my state library

Thanks - I was wondering what your source was...this is fascinating. What is OCLC?

[Starve The Beast]

IMO, if conservatives don't throw an absolute fit and raise hell to get that b**ch off of the 9/11 commission, the dems win in a BIG way.

I feel your pain, but I can't help thinking that Gorelick hanging on may be a good thing. Let's face it, the 9/11 Commission was a clown college from the start. While she stays, Gorelick is a serious blow to their - for lack of a better word - 'Credibility'.

[mass55th]

What is OCLC?

It stands for Online Computer Library Center.

Here's a link to their website: OCLC

[Finalapproach29er]

My compliments on the find.

BTTT

[gwjack]

I could not find the ABA "booklet" on conflict of interest on the ABA's website. I was able to find the destruction book on the publishes website. You can find it and a description at: http://www.aspenpublishers.com/Product.asp?catalog%5Fname=Aspen&category%5Fname=&product%5Fid=0735545499&Mode=SEARCH&ProductType=M

My apologies for not being HTML literate.

Gwjack

[maica]

accuse others of doing what you yourself are actually guilty of.

Founding Principle of the modern dem party

[mass55th]

Here's the information on publications that Gorelick provided Congress during her confirmation hearing on March 16, 1994:

Question #12:
Published Writings: List the titles, publishers, and dates of books, articles, reports, or other published material you have written or edited. Please supply one copy of all published material not readily available to the Committee. Also, please supply a copy of all speeches by you on issues involving constitutional law or legal policy. if there were press reports about the speech, and they are readily available to you, please supply them.

Destruction of Evidence (with Marzen, S. and Solum, J.) (Wiley & Co. 1989) "The.Interview Process," in Internal Co=orate

Investigations (ABA Press, 1992) "Restrictions on the Release of Government Information," 20 Public Contract Law Journal 427 (1991) (with Enzinna, P.) "Recognizing Conflicts of Interest," 36 The Practical Lawyer 71 (1990) "Effective Representation of the Corporation, Its Directors, officers, and Employees in Grand Jury and Agency Investigations," in The Corporate Litigator (ABA Press, 1989) "Parallel Importation After K-Mart v. Cartier ("COPIAT)," 70 Journal of Patent and Trademark Office Society 696 (1988) "Offense Conduct Issues in White-Collar Sentencing," 2 White Collar Crime Reporter No. 3, p.1 (March 1988) and Readings in White- Collar Crime (Lichtenberger, ed.; Meckler 1991),, "Structuring the Internal Investigation When a Corporation Is Faced with Parallel Civil, Criminal and Administrative Proceedings," 3 Corporate Counsel's Ouarterly No. 4, p. 1 (Oct. 1987) "Fighting Government Obstruction of Access to Witnesses," 1

Corporate Criminal Liability Reporter No. 4, p. 19 (Fall 1987) "The Case for Parallel Importation," 11 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Recirculation 205 (1986) (with Little, R.)

Opinion ("A Post-Sedima Update on Establishing Damages in RICO Actions"), 4 RICO Law Reporter No. 2, p. 204 (1986) "The Measure of Damages in RICO Actions," in RICO, The Second Stage (ABA Press, 1985) "Establishing Damages in RICO Actions," 1 RICO Law Reporter 575 (1985) "Grand Jury Representation: A Primer on Pre-Indictment Litigation," 20 Trial No. 10, p. 20 (Oct. 1984) (with Braga, S.) "The Attorney's Duty to Take Contempt," Legal Times of Washington (1978) (with Miller, H.J., Jr.) "Parole Guidelines Confuse Sentencing Process," I Legal Times of Washington, No. 13, p. 9 (August 28, 1978) (with Miller, H.J., Jr.) "Pretrial diversion. The Threat of Expanding Social Control, "10 Harvard Civil rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 180 (1975)

[M. Thatcher]

Thanks so much!! Cool resource.

[holden]

[Ms. Gorelick is] one of the most bipartisan members

He meant to say, "Ms. Gorelick is the second most bipartisan member we have." (Everybody else, including Esquire Richard Bent-Viniste, is tied for first.)

HF

[ATOMIC_PUNK]

Among Western governments, the United States has a leading role in this respect, with executive guidance coming most specifically in Presidential Decision Directive 63 (PDD-63) signed by President Clinton in April 1998.26 Entitled `Critical Infrastructure Protection', PDD-63 calls for a national effort to ensure the security of increasingly vulnerable and interconnected infrastructures in the United States, and emphasizes the importance of the partnership between the government and private sectors and the importance of international cooperation. PDD-63 also creates the National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) under the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The NIPC's mission is to act as the focal agency for gathering information on threats to infrastructure, providing timely warning of attacks, analysis and law enforcement investigation and response

For the United States, this public awareness campaign was initiated in July 1996, when the President's Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP) was established to develop a strategy for protecting and ensuring the continued operation of the nation's computer systems and networks, particularly those governing telecommunications, oil and gas, electricity, bank and financial operations, transportation, water supplies, critical emergency response and government. Executive Order No. 13010, 61 Fed. Reg. 37, 347 (1996). The PCCIP's chairman, Robert Marsh, along with his team of 18, which included former Deputy Attorney-General Jamie Gorelick and former Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee Sam Nunn, spent a year investigating the nation's vulnerabilities from computer attacks and formulating policy proposals for how the US was going to protect its infrastructure. In its October 1997 report, `Critical Foundations: Protecting Americas Infrastructures', the PCCIP described the potentially devastating implications of poor information security from a national perspective and discussed recommendations. While the Report of the PCCIP proposed numerous broad measures of infrastructure security such as IW early warning systems and a cooperative relationship between public and private sector entities, the report makes no mention of the international dimension of the problem of security in cyberspace. `Critical Foundations, Protecting America's Infrastructures' (Report of the President's Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection, Washington, DC, October 1997), available at

FUNNY

THIS PAGE DONT SEEM TO EXIST ANYMORE hmmmmmmm

http://www.pccip.ncr.gov/report_index.html.

http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol12/No5/art1-02.html#P59_31557

[syriacus]

Ms. Gorelick sure has been busy

Here's her latest book, a sequel to Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House (sarcasm)

Ms. Gorelick Builds Her Dream Wall

Foreword by Osama bin Laden. Afterword by Thomas Daschle. Finalword by Hillary Clinton. Critics are raving about the author's ability to maintain a truly palpable air of smiling lightheartedness, even after thousands of her fellow countrymen are killed. Mystery lovers will be thrilled to learn if the main character will clean the wall to try to erase her fingerprints and those of her friends.

[RobFromGa]

Publisher review from Amazon for "Destruction of Evidence":

Editorial Reviews The publisher, John Wiley & Sons A comprehensive survey and systematic analysis of the statutes and case law from all fifty states and the federal system governing destruction of evidence. Synthesizes the many doctrines regulating destruction of evidence and reviews the distinct bodies of law that have developed in the contexts of civil litigation, criminal prosecutions, and professional disciplinary proceedings. Considers implications for practice, including the problems of counseling clients on the legality of routine document management problems, as well as those arising in litigation when evidence has already been destroyed.

[MamaLucci]

GORELICK TO LEAVE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT

* One of Ms. Gorelick's principal priorities was to help prepare the Justice Department to be able to respond effectively to the new challenges of transnational crime and terrorism. To do this, she forged new relationships and administrative protocols with the Departments of State, Treasury and Defense, and with the intelligence community.

(* Hence, her conflict of interest)

The Deputy Attorney General also worked with the Department's law enforcement components to better respond to crisis situations in the aftermath of the incidents at Ruby Ridge and Waco. After the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City in April 1995, she coordinated the government's overall response to the bombing and supervised the investigative and prosecutorial response to the crisis.

"In all of her work with law enforcement," Reno added, "Jamie displayed a sensitivity to the civil liberties of our citizens that gave comfort to all of us who care deeply about the Constitution."terrorists.(My translation)

[demkicker]

I feel your pain, but I can't help thinking that Gorelick hanging on may be a good thing. Let's face it, the 9/11 Commission was a clown college from the start. While she stays, Gorelick is a serious blow to their - for lack of a better word - 'Credibility'.

Granted, what you're saying is correct, but I can't help worrying about the mainstream media continually portraying this commission as legitimate. You and I are paying attention, but there are lots of sheeple asleep at the wheel. I want ALL media outlets to report GORELICK'S HUGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST! The only way that's gonna happen is for thousands to call, write and protest that Gorelick step down. I just want every FReeper to send a quick email or make a phone call. It all adds up....

[Blue Highway]

Her wall is crashing down along with her.

[proud American in Canada]

great find!

bttt

[ConservativeMan55]

bttt

[watchin]

your link

Here's how: <a href="http://www.whatever.com">click here</a>

Simply copy and paste an address between the quotation marks, type a useful link phrase where I have "click here", and you're done.

[VadeRetro]

"Jamie Gorelick wrote the book on conflict of interest."

Yup! And Clinton wrote the book on perjury.