Posted on 05/07/2004 4:23:01 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
|
|
What does the full responsibility mean?
Uh Oh. Don't steal an thunder from the Democrats; they get really upset when you do that. In fact, Tommy Boy might even fall off his stool he'll be so upset.
On a serious not; good for Rumsfeld. The calls for his resignation are just petty.
So, in other words, CBS DIDN'T hold off!
Probably the same thing Janet Reno meant when she "took full responsbility for" Waco.
And I wouldn't have it any other way. :)
There's a multitude of factual reasons why our Secretary of Defense needs to be cautious in this post-911 world. He's defending the nation against a twisted enemy who plots and works to carry out the mass-murder of civilians, a civilization - genocide, with our unfriendly free press - reporters from the same anti-American, pro-UN (fantasy) school - misrepresenting the war and our honorable military from the beginning (readily verifiable - daily, and scroll down to see the earlier, mostly unreported CENTCOM security and humanitarian success reports at the bottom of the page).
Then you might want to read about the Hussein regime, what Saddam and his thugs did to the Iraqi people for over 30 years, Iraqis who are still being oppressed and murdered by these thugs who have no future - the real mass-murderers, and torturers, and rapists that our courageous troops are voluntarily risking their lives, leaving loved ones and jobs to liberate strangers, and defend every American - facing and fighting and removing the same brutal neighborhood bullies that Iraqis fought for years - and died by the thousands, executed and in mass graves - conveniently silent for his accomplices and the UN.
The truth about Iraq: Saddam and his regime was a WMD, and a threat to the free world
Another truth, our press and most of the elected reps pandering to a press-fed, and misled public - mostly ignored the troops, SOD Rumsfeld and the commanding officers on the ground daily - pushing, instead, the "news" from those who have been working to undermine our war efforts from the beginning - and by doing so - emboldening THIS enemy, and endangering America's HONORABLE trooops.
The military is long overdue an apology from the press and most on Capitol Hill.
And, the SOD IS taking responsibility.
It takes time to investigate such a failure of discipline - to punish accordingly.
The military, NOT the press uncovered the activities in this prison, and immediately began investigating.
There will be justice done.
America should be thanking God for SOD Rumsfeld and our military, and it's further proof of the downfall of our press, our culture, our education system that we are so appallingly ungrateful for the sacrifice our troops are making on behalf of us all today - in real blood, pain, sweat, tears, and loss.
8 THE CRUELEST COVER-UP ~ Tales of Saddam's Brutality
8 Graphic proof from Saddam's Killing Fields ~ Photos ~ http://www.9neesan.com | the dead of Iraq
It takes time to investigate such a failure of discipline - to punish accordingly.
What I was responding to was the hypocrisy of the phrase "I take full responsiblity." If Rumsfeld truly is fully responsible for what happened in the Iraqi prisons he doesn't have to investigate any further. He can resign right now. But it's clear he doesn't really believe that he's fully responsible. Otherwise he wouldn't be seeking out those people far lower in the chain of command who do bear direct responsiblity for these crimes.
This is really my complaint. I don't like it when people like Rumsfield (and Janet Reno before him) say, "I take full responsiblity" and then proceed to act as if they believe their personal responsibility is too slight to be worth mentioning, let alone resign over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.