Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hard America, Soft America
Men's News Daily ^ | May 15, 2004 | Bernard Chapin

Posted on 05/17/2004 3:47:07 PM PDT by mjbowers

For years I’ve been mulling over the phrase, “What doesn’t kill us makes us stronger,” and I have finally concluded that the statement is usually true apart from egregious counter-examples like the SS–where what did not kill them turned them into sadistic wraiths. In our society we generally acknowledge that the only way to gain strength and prestige is through working hard and enhancing one’s innate abilities. Even though some may dispute this reality, the proof is in the peripherals as there is probably not a work place in the country lacking one of those mundane “Sharpen the Saw” posters.

That is why it was with considerable excitement that I opened Michael Barone’s Hard America, Soft America: Competition Vs. Coddling and the Battle for the Nation’s Future. The book was just over 160 pages long and proved nearly impossible to put down. In this extended essay, Barone pounces upon one of the most important questions of our day and his work overlaps public policy, politics, history, philosophy and education. In short, it is a text that just about everybody should be able to relate to if not appreciate.

The theme of Hard America, Soft America is that from the ages of 6 to 18 Americans grow up in a downy world that is largely devoid of competition and accountability, but from the ages of 18 to 30 the texture of their lives radically changes as it becomes rocky and subject to the laws of nature. One either produces or they are fired. It is this world, this cauldron of struggle, that forges the Americans who awe the world with a never-ending parade of inventions and discoveries.

Barone gives us a tour of our own history and concludes that much of our illustriousness was created by the rigid and unforgiving forces of Hard America. Men like John D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan may not have been able to release their inner child or give group hugs but they were able to employ thousands and provide the means for mass production that made us the victors of war and peace. Barone views their torch as being carried forward by men like Bill Gates, Jack Welch, Fred Smith, and Sam Walton. Barone makes use of cultural works to justify his thesis and includes films like “The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit,” novels like Sister Carrie and infamous dementations like Charles Reich’s The Greening of America.

The author stresses that there are no firm boundaries between the hard and the soft. Schools may be bastions of softness but within them are islands of sinew. High school graduates immediately encounter Hard America when they enter the military or the private sector (perhaps earlier should they work at McDonalds or Wal-Mart before age 18).

There is a parasitical relationship between the solid and the downy aspects of our culture. It is only by the grace and skill of Hard America that Soft America can survive: “Soft America lives off the productivity, creativity, and competence of Hard America, and we have the luxury of keeping parts of our society Soft only if we keep enough of it hard.” Without a robust military, there would be no way to preserve the freedom and laxity that is Soft America.

Barone dedicated this work to the memory of Senator Moynihan and it is almost a certainty that he would have been pleased by the following description of the effects of excessive softness upon black Americans:

“The Softening of criminal justice, welfare, racial quotas and preferences, and education- had the effect of confining most blacks to Soft America. They were left unprotected against crime, deterred from forming stable families, deincentivized the will to achieve. The advocates of Softening hated the idea of imposing middle-class mores on black Americans, but middle-class mores are necessary for achievement in Hard America, and underclass behavior makes such achievement impossible.”

The field of public education is one in which Softness has triumphed and the author believes that this situation will not change until parents force the issue. For many professionals in our schools, the Chaise lounge chairs of pulpous America massages them forever. Only external forces will coerce them into changing their ways or methodologies.

This reviewer has personally witnessed several attempts of individuals to “Speak Truth to Squishiness” by bringing rigor into their classrooms and then observed the predicable punishments that were meted out to them in response.

Shortly after I finished reading the text I told a teacher about it and she said, “Give me that book now! I need it.” The basis for her interest may have stemmed from her name appearing on a school wide memo ranking our teachers based on who passed the most students. Her name was on the bottom. I recall her coming up to me in the hallway and wondering if I knew of a way she could have passed a student who missed 70 out of 92 days of instruction. I had no answer then and I have no answer now.

Another educator told me of an alternative school that got around the dilemma of what to do with students who do not meet even diluted academic requirements. They issue a no grades whatsoever policy that precludes all descriptors (including “Pass” or “Fail”). He is currently being considered for the Principalship of this institution and wanted to know what I thought about their anti-grading scheme. I told him it was insane. He agreed but noted that the salary was 70 grand a year. I advised that he not mention the policy at all during his interview and then quickly abandon it once his contract was signed. We will see whether or not he has the strength to do so.

Unfortunately, although it is not as clear cut as the two examples I cite, most children do grow up in Soft America. It is a land in which they are molly-coddled and excuses are made for their every need and whimper. Many adults are more concerned with injecting them with self-esteem rather than buoying them up with knowledge. Who would have ever thought that the word “facts” would have the negative connotations it has today in educational circles? Children are shielded from the Bizzaro world of Hard America until they graduate and then are thrown into the cauldron of competition.

I think Michael Barone has done America a great service by writing this book and I encourage everyone to read it. There’s absolutely nothing wonkish about it. The issues are global and should appeal to most citizens– even if it makes the pens of a few bureaucrats run dry.

Bernard Chapin is a writer in Chicago.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bookreview; hardamerica; michaelbarone; softamerica

1 posted on 05/17/2004 3:47:08 PM PDT by mjbowers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mjbowers

“What doesn’t kill us makes us stronger,”

who said that?


2 posted on 05/17/2004 3:48:20 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gilliam

I've seen it attributed to Ghengis Khan, Tamerlane, Marcus Aurelius, and Kahless the Unforgettable.


3 posted on 05/17/2004 3:50:05 PM PDT by Poohbah (Four thousand throats may be cut in a single night by a running man -- Kahless the Unforgettable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gilliam

It was Friedrich Nietzsche, when he got out of Landsberg Prison.


4 posted on 05/17/2004 3:51:07 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers

BTTT


5 posted on 05/17/2004 3:51:18 PM PDT by knews_hound (Out of the NIC ,into the Router, out to the Cloud....Nothing but 'Net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gilliam
"What doesn’t kill us makes us stronger." -Bernard Chapin

Who said that? -gilliam

I didn't hear anything.

6 posted on 05/17/2004 3:52:24 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

Nietzsche, the real spiritual leader of Nazi Germany.


7 posted on 05/17/2004 3:55:37 PM PDT by FreedomSurge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
The theme of Hard America, Soft America is that from the ages of 6 to 18 Americans grow up in a downy world that is largely devoid of competition and accountability, but from the ages of 18 to 30 the texture of their lives radically changes as it becomes rocky and subject to the laws of nature. One either produces or they are fired.

He obviously never worked for the phone company.

8 posted on 05/17/2004 4:04:37 PM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
He obviously never worked for the phone company.

Or the government!

9 posted on 05/17/2004 4:38:53 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Poohbah
Kahless the Unforgettable.

Who?

11 posted on 05/17/2004 4:54:20 PM PDT by Clint Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Kahless the Unforgettable

Did you translate from the original Klingon?

12 posted on 05/17/2004 4:54:47 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Rick Nash will score 40 goals this season...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

See post # 12.


13 posted on 05/17/2004 4:55:23 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Rick Nash will score 40 goals this season...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

LOL! Thanks.


14 posted on 05/17/2004 5:08:13 PM PDT by Clint Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ohiocreek
Michael Barone is the biggest Nancy this side of the Golden Gate...

How do you know that? I've listened to Barone on many occasions and he never came across as anything other than a political scientist of the highest caliber with conservative instincts and an encyclopedic knowledge of how this country works. What would possibly lead you to believe he is a nancy-boy? Are smart people automatically nancy-boys to you?

In any case, your criticism indicates that you don't understand what the book is about. "Hard America" is not Barone's way of describing "manly men." He's talking about free markets and competition in business, where "manly men" contrary to your bias, do not run the show. Even the top dogs in many of the biggest corporations in America are not overtly "manly." Ever heard of Bill Gates? Testosterone levels in business vary with the skills of the business men and women involved, skills which run the gamut from mathletes to advertising gurus to R&D engineers, many of whom, you can be certain, are not manly men.

The "manly men" tend to be changing the light bulbs or fixing a heating duct in the boss's office.

15 posted on 05/17/2004 5:31:34 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: beckett

nice post!
great article!
can't wait to read the book.


16 posted on 05/17/2004 8:37:25 PM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson