Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/29/2004 5:18:01 PM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Maria S

Those "gay" people are mighty touchy.


2 posted on 05/29/2004 5:24:02 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maria S

So...does this also apply to "butt monkey"?


3 posted on 05/29/2004 5:25:12 PM PDT by Fintan (Seriously...does my hair look all right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maria S

Excellent! A good strike against PC:
By simple logical extension, all the synonymic expressions, previously thought of as derogatory, now are to be seen as OK.


4 posted on 05/29/2004 5:25:33 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maria S
I thought calling someone a homosexual was a complement. All us heterosexuals are nothing but knuckle draggers.
9 posted on 05/29/2004 5:34:46 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maria S
So, just guessing here and based upon her rationale, when we call Judge Nancy Gertner a "Bull Dyke," what the heck, that ain't insulting either.
14 posted on 05/29/2004 5:39:26 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maria S
She pointed to a Supreme Court ruling last year that found a Texas sodomy law unconstitutional, and to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling last year that it would be unconstitutional to prevent gays in the state from marrying.

More unintended consequences of the Lawrence decision. (Or maybe not so unintended!)

18 posted on 05/29/2004 5:50:53 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maria S

If a guy doesn't have a right to take offence at that-just what the hell are we justified in taking offence at then????


25 posted on 05/29/2004 6:19:58 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Every functional brain in America is a threat to Kerry's Presidential aspirations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maria S

Slander I (sort of) understand (though in my mind being called a homosexual would be pretty sladerous). But not libel...

If I'm NOT gay, and you publish an article or book stating that I AM get, THAT is libelous because it IS A LIE.

Legal Beagles: what am I missing??


31 posted on 05/29/2004 6:33:07 PM PDT by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maria S
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Nancy Gertner came as she threw out a lawsuit by a former boyfriend of pop singer Madonna who claimed he was libeled because his name appeared in a photo caption in a book about Madonna - under a picture of Madonna walking with a gay man.

Did the caption in fact misidentify the man in the photo? If so, why would this count as a libel rather than an error?

47 posted on 05/30/2004 8:38:59 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson