Posted on 06/11/2004 8:25:53 AM PDT by Libertarian444
AP Survey: Bush Gets Little Credit on Jobs By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 11:02 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The U.S. economy has gained about 1.2 million jobs in the last six months, but most voters haven't gotten the word.
They're too focused on the war in Iraq and other news -- and too busy trying to make ends meet -- to notice the upbeat economic development. Few voters seem to be giving President Bush credit for the new jobs or other signs of recovery.
``I don't think he's created anything,'' said Lonnie Steele, 57, an undecided voter from East Flat Rock, N.C. ``I know a number of people who are educated people, and they are working two or three minimum-wage jobs just trying to put groceries on the table and keep their families alive.''
An Associated Press survey of 788 registered voters conducted Monday through Wednesday shows that while they may be gaining confidence in the economy and Bush's performance, 57 percent said the nation has lost jobs in the last six months. The Labor Department has reported just the opposite -- nearly 1.2 million jobs gained in half a year.
``The message hasn't gotten out,'' said Andy Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center. ``It takes a while for national changes to get down to the people level.''
The Nov. 2 election may hinge on whether the economy continues to improve and whether voters notice. The race is a dead heat, with Bush at 46 percent, Democrat John Kerry at 45 percent and independent candidate Ralph Nader at 6 percent, according to the AP poll conducted by Ipsos-Public Affairs.
Kerry's advisers say they're not surprised that many voters don't know about the new jobs. ``It's because the quality of jobs that have been created are inferior to the jobs that have been lost,'' said one, Tad Devine.
Retorted Bush spokeswoman Nicolle Devenish: ``That's just not true. Two-thirds of the jobs that have been created are in sectors with higher-paying salaries than the national average.'' She pointed to Bureau of Labor Statistics figures showing the average salary for non-supervisory workers at $15.64 an hour.
But the BLS also reports that a bulk of the new jobs -- 978,000 -- come from the private services sector, where the average hourly salary is $15.24. Of the sector's professional and businesses services jobs created in May, nearly half are temporary help, the bureau said.
``The jobs are being created for college students at McDonald's,'' said Barbara Mulkey, a Democratic voter from rural Floyd County, Ky. She said jobs had been lost, then didn't budge on her opinion of Bush when told she was wrong.
Michelle Blundy initially said U.S. jobs had been lost and called herself a ``probable'' Bush voter. Informed about the jobs gain, the Grand Rapids, Mich., woman said she would vote for Bush -- and chalked up her original skepticism to Michigan's poor economy.
``They're going to say all the jobs in Michigan are going here or there, whereas there may be jobs created in Colorado that of course we don't know about because we're not there,'' she said.
But many voters were like Steele, unswayed by the positive jobs figures. Though he had read about the gains in his local paper, the retired contractor still feels bad about the economy and the country, partly because of Iraq.
``There was a time when I would be proud to tell people I'm an American,'' Steele said. ``Right now, in Iraq or anywhere, I'd be scared to tell people I'm an American.''
Even a staunch Bush backer such as James Floyd said he thought jobs were lost in the last six months. ``Jobs are moving overseas,'' said the Conroe, Texas, trucking firm owner.
Bush is not the first president to suffer from a disconnect between job figures and voter perceptions. His father had poor ratings on the economy and lost re-election in 1992, though an economic recovery was under way.
Bush campaign aides said the positive job news has been overshadowed by other events -- from Martha Stewart's legal troubles to the Iraqi prison abuse scandal. Even Ronald Reagan's death.
``There's been a lot of news to compete with the economic news,'' Devenish said.
Less than half of registered voters approve of Bush's job performance, believe the nation is headed in the right direction and back his efforts on domestic affairs, the AP-Ipsos poll showed. Disapproval of his efforts in Iraq increased -- to 55 percent from 51 percent last month.
About 47 percent of the respondents said they approve of the president's performance on the economy, a slight improvement from last month when 43 percent held that view.
Kerry will try to keep voters focused on the most dismal economic data while fueling their anxieties about interest rates, health care premiums, tuition bills and other costs of living.
Bush plans to continue using domestic travel to highlight workers who have taken higher-paying jobs and companies that are hiring. His latest television ad tries to turn the tables on Kerry.
``After recession, 9-11 and war, now our economy has been growing for 10 straight months,'' the ad says. ``John Kerry's response? He's talking about the Great Depression. One thing's sure: Pessimism never created a job.''
Even as I type Rush is saying that no matter how good the economy goes the press rants on and on about a totally fabricated economic malaise. It's gone to extremes beyond all measure. Something I just found out yesterday-- the fact is that taxes (as % gdp) were the highest under Clinton, higher even than were needed during WWII, and with just 3 years of Dubya's tax cuts (they've have gone down to the lowest point in nearly half a century.
And everyone complains about illegal immigrants taking all those jobs that have gone to China. Amazing.
Remember how Al Gore tried to morph into Ronald Reagan? Somebody should keep a watch on Kerry's Mabeline expenses...
Willie Green: So you believe that Ronald Reagan should've outsourced our industrial infrastructure to The Evil Empire like Dubya's doing with the Chicoms?
I then asked you to answer my questions and you responded Already did. It's not my fault that the implications of my reply to you sailed into one ear and out the other without making contact with anything.
So, asking a question about the Evil Empire and the Chicoms is an anwer to my questions on Chinese manufacturing job losses, where they went, or what may have caused them to no longer be needed?
Since my query questions the wisdom of upgrading the Chicoms industrial infrastructure, yes, I'd say I answered your question as to whether technology had anything to do with shifts in the Chinese workforce.
Doh!
Are you really so dense that you have to have it spelled out for you?
You KNOW the big industry in East Flat Rock is runnin' 'shine.
That is his fault. The media certainly is not going to let good ecnomic news come out. BTW, Dubya's first ad blitz did give him a bounce.
For the record, I have worked on numerous campaigns. I have done work for Ashcroft, Sen. Kit Bond and Jim Talent, Rep. Sam Graves, and Sec. of St. MO Matt Blunt. I have also volunteered for Bush and have worked as a driver for his motorcade and event staff. That good enough for you?
Except, naturally, for the leftist Dims, who of course are dumber than a box of rocks and believe whatever pap is fed to them by the appropriate liberal media channels.
That's not what the article said;
"Mixing water and concentrate to produce soft drinks is classified as manufacturing," the president's report reads. "However, if that activity is performed at a snack bar, it is considered a service."
"The report does not recommend that burger-flippers be counted alongside factory workers."
Guess the "fact" that Dubya is outsourcing "our industrial infrastructure" to the Chicoms explains this;
"... new factory hiring has jumped to a 31-year high, the best since 1973. Of more than 400 industrial firms surveyed, 36 percent added workers in May, while just 7 percent had fewer workers...."
But by all means keep ignoring all the great economic news we've had for several months now.
And keep posting your links liberal Bush-bashing media sources to push your doom and gloom message on FR.
All the more reason for us to appreciate great leaders like Reagan who always spread optimism and hope. Such a contrast between this and the Dems who prey on negativity and fear. (kinda like your posts)
Jorge, I was referring to a link that Willie linked to and was dated in February.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.