Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Can't plan for everything.
1 posted on 07/18/2004 5:30:33 AM PDT by Max Combined
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Max Combined
the insurgency took U.S. military leaders by surprise because they believed the assurances of Iraqi

Who assured them? Baghdad Bob?

2 posted on 07/18/2004 5:33:31 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined

I don't believe we expected the drawn out resistance we got in post WWII Germany either.


3 posted on 07/18/2004 5:36:56 AM PDT by cripplecreek (yes. As a matter of fact, my legs are broke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined
I am about halfway through with a great WWII book,
An Army at Dawn: The War in Africa, 1942-1943 by Rick Atkinson. Eisenhower, considered to be a great military leader, made literally scores of errors of omission and comission. Bush and his planners pitch a near shutout in a one-month war, and are castigated daily in the press for failing to be omniscient. Where were today's "journalists" when perspective was being handed out? Probably occupying a college building, protesting something or other.
6 posted on 07/18/2004 5:54:04 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined
To the contrary, planning was bent severly to resolve for political satisfaction within the Bush [still running 39% of the Clinton] Administration, the shortage of troops problem.

Without enough troops, insurgency was deftly removed from the game board, and wishful thinking installed at several locations, in place of such troops.

7 posted on 07/18/2004 6:01:11 AM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined

I think we also failed to anticipate the breakdown in civil order. Our failure to immediately stop the looting and crime was resented by many Iraqis. Where we have now restored order, where Iraqis can work and go about their lives in relative safety, there is gratitude for what we've accomplished.


8 posted on 07/18/2004 6:25:42 AM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined

When it comes to war you plan for all possible contingencies, if you don't or cannot, then you have no business being in the war business.


9 posted on 07/18/2004 6:26:53 AM PDT by The Bandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined
the insurgency took U.S. military leaders by surprise because they believed the assurances of Iraqi opposition groups and defectors that American forces would be welcomed.

This is naive beyond belief.

Did the general think that 100% of the people would welcome us? How about 90%? That would leave a couple of million candidate insurgents. This guy has to be a Clinton appointee. The military plans for the unexpected and I simply do not believe that post invasion attacks on the American "occupiers" could have possibly been a surprise to the military leadership when it wasn't a surprise to me.

11 posted on 07/18/2004 7:51:46 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined

I have trouble believing this. Or maybe I just don't want to think out leaders are that stupid.


13 posted on 07/18/2004 8:26:42 AM PDT by nosofar ("I'm not above the Law. I am the Law!" - Judge Dredd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined
Testifying with Keane were two other retired Army officers, Col. Douglas Macgregor... and Maj. Gen. Robert Scales.

Scales advocated spending less money on new weapons and technology and more on educating soldiers in cultural, language and strategic skills

I'm happy he's retired.

19 posted on 07/18/2004 11:59:44 AM PDT by Chief_Joe (From where the sun now sits, I will fight on -FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined
We didn't know the media was going to call them insurgents. That the press was going to make a big deal out of any set backs, THAT we know. But, other than that it's been stunning success!
21 posted on 07/18/2004 12:06:33 PM PDT by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined

"I am convinced that the best service a retired general can perform is to turn in his tongue along with his suit and to mothball his opinions."
General Omar Bradley


23 posted on 07/18/2004 12:26:10 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Max Combined
The mistake was in not leveling Tikrit and killing everyone in it. That would have given them some pause. However, the terrorists who streamed (and still stream) in from the outside are going to bring about a civil war, and when it's over, there will be a good many fewer Sunni Moslems living in the country.
26 posted on 07/18/2004 6:17:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson