If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
Posted on 08/03/2004 5:52:24 AM PDT by Warrior Nurse
“We’ve got a president that’s prepared to take us back to the days of Jim Crow segregation and dominance,” says NAACP president Kweisi Mfume. Republicans’ “idea of equal rights is the American flag and Confederate swastika flying side by side,” says NAACP chairman Julian Bond. And the leaders of this supposedly nonpartisan organization are surprised President Bush declined to attend their convention last week?
Instead, tomorrow the president will address the National Urban League, a black organization whose mainstream leadership is focused on ideas for improving life in inner cities rather than on politics and racial demagoguery. The president will have a lot to talk about. Issues number one and two on his domestic agenda have been education reform and his faith-based initiative, both specifically targeted to help inner city minority residents, and both implemented by two accomplished African-American cabinet members, education secretary Rod Paige and HUD secretary Alphonso Jackson.
“We’ve got a president that’s prepared to take us back to the days of Jim Crow segregation and dominance,” says NAACP president Kweisi Mfume. Republicans’ “idea of equal rights is the American flag and Confederate swastika flying side by side,” says NAACP chairman Julian Bond. And the leaders of this supposedly nonpartisan organization are surprised President Bush declined to attend their convention last week?
Instead, tomorrow the president will address the National Urban League, a black organization whose mainstream leadership is focused on ideas for improving life in inner cities rather than on politics and racial demagoguery. The president will have a lot to talk about. Issues number one and two on his domestic agenda have been education reform and his faith-based initiative, both specifically targeted to help inner city minority residents, and both implemented by two accomplished African-American cabinet members, education secretary Rod Paige and HUD secretary Alphonso Jackson.
During his 2000 campaign, George Bush spoke often and eloquently about the need to improve education, particularly for minorities, who he said too often suffer from “the soft bigotry of low expectations.” The day after his inauguration, President Bush brought together a renowned group of education experts who began to craft the No Child Left Behind Act, which Congress passed a few months later with overwhelming bipartisan support. This landmark legislation, which increased federal education funding by nearly 50 percent, has brought elements of accountability and competition into the equation for the first time.
President Bush has also strongly supported school choice programs aimed at helping to liberate African-American children from dysfunctional urban public schools—the last civil-rights battle. This year he joined forces with Washington D.C.’s black Democratic mayor, Anthony Williams, to win passage of the first federally funded voucher program, which will provide $7,500 each to poor minority children in the nation’s capital, giving them some of the same educational options that their wealthier neighbors enjoy.
In January 2001, President Bush, surrounded by two dozen black ministers, fulfilled another “compassionate conservative” campaign promise by creating the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, making it easier for inner-city black churches to receive public support for providing social services. By all accounts, this initiative is particularly close to the president’s heart: he knows from personal experience how faith and compassion can empower individuals to turn their lives around.
The Bush administration has also tried hard to help lift Africa out of its deepening misery. Last year, the president pledged $15 billion—a twenty-fold increase from Clinton-era funding levels—to help stem the AIDS pandemic sweeping the continent, and he has sent troops and diplomatic envoys to try to quell violence in Liberia and Sudan. The administration has also launched the Millennial Challenge program, which seeks to make sure that our foreign aid is not misused and that governments that receive it abide by certain human rights standards. Musician and longtime African-relief activist Bob Geldof recently acknowledged, “The Bush administration is the most radical—in a positive sense—in its approach to Africa since Kennedy.”
The speech President Bush gave last summer on Goree Island, Senegal—the point of embarkation for millions of African slaves—also shows the vision and understanding he brings to the vexed issue of race in America. The media fawned over President Clinton, when, during his 1998 trip to Africa, he offered these carefully parsed words: “Going back to the time before we were even a nation, European Americans received the fruits of the slave trade, and we were wrong in that.” However, President Bush attracted scant attention when he used deeply religious and moral language to condemn roundly “the evils of slavery” as “one of the greatest crimes of history” in a remarkably eloquent address. In paragraph after paragraph he graphically details the horrors of slavery and its corrupting influence on our country: “Small men took on the powers and airs of tyrants and masters. . . . Christian men and women became blind to the clearest commands of their faith and added hypocrisy to injustice. A republic founded on equality became a prison for millions.”
In this moving speech, the president does not condescend to treat blacks solely as victims but, in words reminiscent of Lincoln’s Second Inaugural’s meditation on God’s purpose, offers an empowering message that puts their trials in the context of the overall struggle for human liberty. Invoking the contributions of abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth, he says: “Their moral vision caused Americans to examine our hearts, to correct our Constitution, and to teach our children the dignity and equality of every person of every race. By a plan known only to Providence, the stolen sons and daughters of Africa helped to awaken the conscience of America. The very people traded into slavery helped to set America free.”
The address goes on to salute more recent civil rights leaders such as Martin Luther King and to note optimistically that, while the country still has a way to go, it moves ever closer to its founding promise of equal citizenship for all Americans: “My nation’s journey toward justice has not been easy and it is not over. The racial bigotry fed by slavery did not end with slavery or with segregation. And many of the issues that still trouble America have roots in the bitter experience of other times. But however long the journey, our destination is set: liberty and justice for all.”
President Bush clearly understands and shares Martin Luther King’s dream of a colorblind society where individuals are “judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” To take one small example: he never mentions the skin color of two of the most prominent members of his administration, Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, even though he might score political points by doing so.
It should be an interesting speech tomorrow. Americans of all hues should take notice.
Charles Sahm directs a Latin American police reform program for the Manhattan Institute.
What else can the NAACP do but lie.
Change both "should"s to "won't"s, and it's more accurate.
It WON'T be an intersting speech, because the Leftists will spike it in the media.
And The Sheep WON'T take notice of it. They've received their orders.
Race pimps like the Quezze, Bond, Sharpton, the rev Jaxon...they all count on blacks continuing to think like racists.
Then the Republicans should turn clips of the speech into ads and run them on urban radio and tv stations.
A group of successful Black Americans who support the Bush administration and President Bush.
I know I am a member of Project 21.
PING
I have never seen a Confederate Swastika, are they different from the German one?
Is Julian Bond calling the Confederate flag a Swastika?
I looked up the definition of Swastika and the Confederat flag doesnt match any of the descriptions. I suppose Mr. Bond is trying to dredge up hatred, by calling the flag a swastika. Thats about all he and Kweasy are capable of dredging hatred. What would Julian and Kweasy use if it werent for the Confederate flag , its kept them in the race baiting business for years. they should love it,and they probably do.
Bond and Frizell should heed this adage it is better to be thought a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Once again, Bush shows his courage. The NAACP is a leftist organization. For years, Republicans have assisted them in perpetrating the lie that they are a "bipartisan" group by making them a required stop on the campaign trail. They did this because they didn't want to be accused of being racist.
Even though it took great courage to do this, it's a win/win for Bush. He's reduced the credibility of the NAACP, while boosting the credibility of the Urban league, which really is open to bipartisanship.
Kwesi is irrelevant in the world.
FWI..from a purely political perspective, the black vote in this country, as a bloc, does not matter one iota to a presidential result...go to a census website, and look at the list of states with the largest black populations..most are in heavily Dem states, like NY or California, or heavily GOP states, like MISS and LA, where there is NO chance of a swing. Florida will not be close this year...however, there are a few states, like Wisconsin, with a small black population, where local issues, like school vouchers in Milwaukee, might enable the GOP to peelm away some black votes, and that could make a difference..
Your assessment is correct. Republicans can win any election without the black vote but the Democrats can't win a dog catcher race without the black vote. Black people need to start asking in the last 40 years what has voting Democrat gotten us.
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
Agree..but that wasn't my point..even if 50% of blacks in NY state voted for Bush, he'd still lose the state..they have almost zero leverage, on both sides..even intra-state, because of the special minority CD's..if you really want to get a sense of the black electorate's problem..print out a list of the House Dems by seniority...then check off those which are members of the Black Caucus..it's staggering..
the conservatives (like me) & moderates left the organization DECADES ago.
free dixie,sw
the conservatives (like me) & moderates left the organization DECADES ago.
free dixie,sw
I'm sure the Vast, LeftWing Medyuh Whore'd will make this front page news......NOT!!
FReegards...MUD
If someone didn't know better, they might think that blacks make up a HUGE percentage of our population!
They certainly make a lot of racket and demand a lot -- for a group that only comprises 13-14% of our population.
Ya know, this country abounds with opportunities - for everyone. Certainly more so than any other liveable place on Earth.
Everyone in America can be whatever they want - including a complete failure. All it takes is an attitude that takes the easy road of blaming everyone else for your own inadequacies, and POOF! -- you're a failure.
After all, what fun is there in taking charge of your own future by working hard and making the tough decision to sacrifice and forego the meaningless, easy things in favor of building a productive, substantial and worthwhile life?
No, it's much easier to strut around and shoot your mouth off about things you know little about.
You'd think that skin color prohibits a person from achieving success in American life. While I'll acknowledge there are problems that do exist, there are also plenty of success stories of people who have risen from humble beginnings to become very successful.
How about if our government will begin a program of subsidizing one-way tickets for anyone who thinks they can get a better deal somewhere else?
I stress "one-way"...
I think it would be a worthwhile investment that would save a lot of money in the long run. If only we could get people to make the effort of taking advantage of the offer....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.