"My comments page is full of obssessive psychotic postings from you"
Really?
Let's see what your comments page had on it prior to your post 411 in this thread?
Dealing with terrorist states like iran and pakistan: Leanning from missed opportunities.
Posted by jerrydavenport to swarthyguy; Sabertooth
On Bloggers & Personal 08/23/2004 7:54:09 PM EDT · 14 of 27
pakhtoons are the most savage, barbaric, treacherous, islamized and volatile ethnicity in the world.
they are responsible for all of the fanatacism and trouble in afghanistan and almost all of it in pakistan as well.
the taliban were 100% pakthtoons. the pakhtoons make most of the al qaeda and jamiati islami ranks in pakistan. Pakhtoon migrant workers are responsible for most of the trouble in moderate states like dubai
If you pay attention to history, apart from maybe one odd leader like ghaffar khan, the pakhtoon have always been deeply savage and fanatic.the kashmir problem arose because fanatic pakhtoon hordes from pakistan invading india. Even today, pakhtoons have been involved in the militancy in kashmir.
if we didnt have the northern alliance on our side in afghanistan to subdue the pakhtoons, afghanistan would have been another iraq.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to Cronos; SJackson; Sabertooth; Ragtime Cowgirl
On News/Activism 08/23/2004 7:45:28 PM EDT · 94 of 95
A pathan state would be another taliban state.
The pathans have a history of fanatacism ever since the british rule. Today, all your taliban ranks, most of your al qaeda and jamiati islami ranks are again pakhtoons.
The pathans also need to be deported back from other moderate islamic states and the west, where they are the source of much of the islamic sentiment.
A PATHAN STATE, A WAHHABI STATE OR A SHIITE STATE WOULD BE A RE-ENACTMENT OF THE TALIBAN STATE AND A MAJOR DISASTER.
this is a minority that is extremely dangerous, volatile and islamic, so they can never be given independence. they have to be put under the control of another strong ethnicity to be subdued.
The pathans are no lions, they were subdued by the sikhs first, with most pathan areas under sikh rule.
the pathans have recently been subdued by the tajiks from the northern alliance.
pathans not subdued by another dominant ethnicity has proved disastrous for both the british and the US in the past.
Afghanistan would have been another iraq, if we didnt have the tajiks from the northern alliance to subdue the pathans.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to P.O.E.; SJackson; Sabertooth
On News/Activism 08/23/2004 1:22:21 AM EDT · 52 of 95
A small state doesn't have the manpower, the resources, the infrastructure or an economy large enough to sustain it's hegemonic aspirations.
However care must be taken that those states are formed along ethnic not religious lines.
it would be nice to have a state emphasizing an azeri, sindhi or balochi sentiment, but disastrous to have one emphasizing the wahabi or shiite sentiment.
we need the islamic world to think in terms of ethnicities not islam.
All of this would be in tune with america's founding principles of freedom and liberty, since we would be freeing supressed people.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to MCH; SJackson; Sabertooth
On News/Activism 08/23/2004 12:53:35 AM EDT · 49 of 95
these islamic ethnic states have ethnic majorities having their own culture, language, customs, food, everything.
they are nations in every meaning of the word.
These have been cobbled together into islamic empires by force through the drumming of islamic sentiment into them since childhood.
the very existence of these states is expansionist, since they don't share anything in common. They have joined together because of a strong pan islamic senitment of an islamic world without borders of islamic conquest and glory.
we need to replace this islamic sentiment of an islamic world without borders into islamic ethnicities emphasizing their differences to prevent the formation of an islamic empire.
we have to do to the islamic world, what was done to the communist and ottoman empire before it
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies
Islamic terror and political manipulations
Posted by jerrydavenport to Ragtime Cowgirl
On Bloggers & Personal 08/23/2004 12:43:45 AM EDT · 7 of 7
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies
Islamic terror and political manipulations
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson; Sabertooth
On Bloggers & Personal 08/23/2004 12:41:54 AM EDT · 6 of 7
Muslims are crooked, unethical, have no respect for human life and have very strong loyalties to islam.
Muslims would conspire and lie at the first opportunity, but they are also extremely stupid and incapable of sustaining a complex thought process
Western intelligence agencies should use these islamic traits for an intelligence ops against it's islamic cadres and countries like iran, pakistan and saudi arabia to weed out islamic moles or atleast prevent spying by muslims for the duration of the ops. a few ops every now and then would keep the muslims on their toes.
1- Pressure islamic countries, this would cause islamic countries to run to islamic moles for information or maybe to terrorists for leverage.
2- we could then bait the islamic cadres and watch both them and the islamic govts with
3- a new set of intelligence operatives unknown to the them, preferably from another agency to monitor them and translate.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to P.O.E.
On News/Activism 08/23/2004 12:22:07 AM EDT · 45 of 95
haha: this is funny, you want a federalist middle east?, an islamic empire?, whose side are you on?
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson
On News/Activism 08/23/2004 12:19:26 AM EDT · 44 of 95
Break up of islamic countries along ethnic lines would not only replace islamic sentiment with secular ethnic sentiment, it would also use indigenous force to restore order to the region, taking the burden away from the international community.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to MCH; SJackson
On News/Activism 08/23/2004 12:10:19 AM EDT · 39 of 95
Most of the islamic ethnicities btw have fought for their independence one time or another and would still want to be
free.
if it wasn't for the break up of the ottoman empire, we'd be today faced with a behemoth of an islamic state in the middle east stretching all the way from europe into asia and all the time aspiring to conquer more.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson; Sabertooth; swarthyguy
On News/Activism 08/22/2004 11:46:32 PM EDT · 36 of 95
Islamic rule is analogous to communist rule.
islam keeps the different ethnicities fused through force and a strong islamic sentiment, just like the communist world used a strong communist sentiment and force to keep the communist world united.
so just like the communist world was broken into ethnic states with the break up of the soviet union, yugoslavia, czechoslovakia etc, so can the islamic world be broken into small ethnic independent states.
I mean most of the middle east was once the ottoman empire, but is now small independent countries.
Similarly all large islamic countries can be broken up into small ethnic states much like the soviet union and the ottoman empire before it.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson
On News/Activism 08/22/2004 11:37:21 PM EDT · 33 of 95
it makes perfect sense for most ethnicities,except for the pakhtoons or pashtuns, who are deeply religious and militant.
Pakhtoons made the entire taliban ranks. they make al qaeda recruits and most of the jamiati islami in Pakistan.
A pakhtoon independent state would be like another taliban state. As such the pakhtoons should be incorporated into tajikistan or someplace to be subdued by another dominant ethnicity.
while secular sindhis, baluchis, azeris etc should be created into independent states.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies
Breaking up is hard to do-Afghanistan and Iraq are failed states. Why not accept reality?
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson
On News/Activism 08/22/2004 11:36:05 PM EDT · 32 of 95
it makes perfect sense for most ethnicities,except for the pakhtoons or pashtuns, who are deeply religious and militant.
Pakhtoons made the entire taliban ranks. they make al qaeda recruits and most of the jamiati islami in Pakistan.
A pakhtoon independent state would be like another taliban state. As such the pakhtoons should be incorporated into tajikistan or someplace to be subdued by another dominant ethnicity.
while secular sindhis, baluchis, azeris etc should be created into independent states.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies
Dealing with terrorist states like iran and pakistan: Leanning from missed opportunities.
Posted by jerrydavenport to swarthyguy; SJackson; Sabertooth
On Bloggers & Personal 08/22/2004 11:19:52 PM EDT · 12 of 27
Last year the saudis pumped $ 2 billion in aid into Pakistan amidst many speeches against israel and india.
The money it seems was given to pakistan to destroy the jewish and indian lobbies
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies
Dealing with terrorist states like iran and pakistan: Leanning from missed opportunities.
Posted by jerrydavenport to Cronos; SJackson; Sabertooth; Ragtime Cowgirl
On Bloggers & Personal 08/22/2004 10:17:03 PM EDT · 11 of 27
pakhtoons or pashtuns are the source of the entire problem in the afghanistan/pakistan region.
they made up the taliban in afghanistan and they make up most of the jamiati islami in pakistan.
pakhtoon migrant workers are also the source of potential trouble in moderate arab states like dubai and kuwait etc.
they need to be deported and then merged into afghanistan or the entire bunch into central asia.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies
Dealing with terrorist states like iran and pakistan: Leanning from missed opportunities.
Posted by jerrydavenport to Cronos; swarthyguy; SJackson; Sabertooth; Ragtime Cowgirl
On Bloggers & Personal 08/22/2004 10:10:56 PM EDT · 10 of 27
You don't want to create a pakhtoonistan.
The pakhtoons are the most troublesome and islamic ethnicity in the world, right from the time of the british rule to the present day.
The pakhtoons made 100% of the taliban ranks.
Al qaeda today is again hiding in pakhtoon areas.
most of the jamiati islami leadership is pakhtoon.
most of the protests against the war in iraq in moderate islamic states like dubai were again staged by pakhtoon migrant workers in those countries.
You don't want to create a pakhtoon state, you'd rather have them merged into afghanistan or central asia to be subdued by them.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies
Islamic terror and political manipulations
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson; Sabertooth; Ragtime Cowgirl
On Bloggers & Personal 08/21/2004 6:03:36 PM EDT · 5 of 7
In my opinion, the best possible way to deal with al qaeda is
1- to Use the creators of al qaeda, that is pakistan and saudi arabia to take al qaeda apart. Since these countries created it, they could take it apart in a breeze.
Their recent successes against al qaeda show just how effective these countries can be against al qaeda, when they are pressured into it. Iran can similarly be pressured to move against al qaeda operatives on its own soil.
2- Alongwith this, we need to commission western linguists
i- to monitor the govts of pakistan, iran and saudi arabia to ensure their compliance.
ii- to monitor islamists within western intelligence to prevent them from forming a mini islamic intelligence setup in the midst of islamic intelligence.
3- We need to make sure that no countries run terror camps to train terrorists.
As long as there are no terror training camps out there, we just would have to deal with terrorists already in the field. terrorists who should be known to the govts of pakistan and saudi arabia and as such easy to apprehend. Iran could be threatened to crack down against al qaeda
on it's soil.
4- these measures should be accompanied by outlawing of parties like jamiati islami to deny the terrorists still out there, the infrastructure or resources for attacks.
5- We would also need to bankrupt islamic businesses and charities to rob teror outfits of alternate sources of funding.
6- Further measures should be implemented to outlaw islamic school to prevent a potential pool of people that could be used for terror at any time in the future.
7- Troublesome ethnicities like the pashtuns and sects like the wahhabis and shiites should be deported from moderate states and replaced with non muslim filipino and other workers.
8- All this should be accompanied by measures to encourage third countries like israel and india to address the iranian and paki nukes and missiles.
9- The countries of iran, pakistan and saudi arabia should eventually be broken up into small little states emphasizing ethnic sentiment over the islamic sentiment to strike at the root of islamic global aspirations that give rise to islamic terror, WMD and political manipulations.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies
Kibbitzing American Intelligence
Posted by jerrydavenport to wagglebee
On News/Activism 08/21/2004 5:35:35 PM EDT · 2 of 2
computer translations make perfect sense for skimming through bulk of information
Anything that is worthwhile could then be handed over to a proper linguist for translation.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies
Dealing with terrorist states like iran and pakistan: Leanning from missed opportunities.
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson; Sabertooth; Ragtime Cowgirl
On Bloggers & Personal 08/21/2004 2:25:24 PM EDT · 4 of 27
take a look at the postings and the diagrams.
It's new stuff weaved into some old stuff, while the diagrams make it easier to understand
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies
Dealing with terrorist states like iran and pakistan: Leanning from missed opportunities.
Posted by jerrydavenport to jerrydavenport
On Bloggers & Personal 08/21/2004 2:23:36 PM EDT · 3 of 27
A- Today, there are three state sponsors of islamic terror,Iran, Pakistan and saudi arabia.
Pan islamic parties like jamiati islami and pan islamists within the paki establishment provide a bridge between the wahhabi and shiite camp.
Pakistan is the hub of the entire terror effort with both radical shiite and wahhabi elements not only present in Pakistan, but brought together by parties like jamiati islami and islamic cadres in western intelligence.
The same way that the ottoman empire was first broken up in the past along ethnic lines to rob it of the infrastructure, resources, size and the islamic sentiment and then secular kemal attaturk put in power to weed the islamists of turkey, today, similar measures are needed against iran, pakistan and saudi arabia.
1- Pakistan: Pakistan has been responsible for terror stretching from india, afghanistan, hamas, algeria and chechenya all the way to bosnia, albania, europe and america.
the most islamic and hostile islamic ethnicities in pakistan are the pashtuns and the punjabis.
a -The pashtun ethnicity makes up the taliban in afghanistan and jamiati islami and al qaeda ranks in Pakistan.
they also make the volatile elements of the shiite community in Pakistan with strong links to groups like hizbollah.
the large pashtun expatriate community in saudi arabia together with al qaeda tried to topple the saudi monarchy.
Pashtun expatriate populations in moderate islamic states like dubai and malaysia have been the source of all islamic unrest in those regions as well. The recent al qaeda arrest in dubai, again was that of a pashtun. The previous war against iraq resulted in protests by the pashtun communities in dubai, kuwait etc.
i- Pashtuns as a community needed to be deported from moderate islamic countries and replaced with filipino and other non muslim workers.
ii- Pashtun businesses need to be all bankrupted as they not only finance al qaeda activity but might also be working as al qaeda's communication channels between saudi arabia, dubai and pakistan.
iii- the pashtun areas need to be merged into afghanistan or central asian states to be subdued by other ethnicities.
b- Punjab another troublesome and militant province needs to be merged into the indian punjab, since they both have the same ethnicity. there the sikhs would keep islamic sentiment subdued.
c- The sindhis and the baluchis are secularist pakistani minorities. Baluchis are the smallest Pakistani ethnicity, but baluchistan is the largest pakistani province accounting for all of Pakistan's mineral resource with ccess to the strategic strait of hormuz. together with sind, baluchistan accounts for all of Pakistan's coastline and sea ports.
we should turn these ethnicities into independent nations, which would give us control over all the trade flowing into
the region and all of the mineral wealth as well.
2- Iran: Shiite iran has been the source of most of the instability in iraq, lebanon, and a spate of terror attacks against the west. The shiite community dispersed around the world ,provides iran with a very large intelligence presence around the world.
the reformists, in iran though wanting freedoms for themselves, also seem to want a powerful iran armed with nukes and missiles. we should nevertheless use these reformists to push the hardliners out. We could then use the third force or the truly westernized iranians to push the reformists out. we should then divide iran into small countries to rob it of regional aspirations.
Persians make up only 51% of iran.
i- the azeris account for 26% of the iranian population and could be easily merged into neighboring azerbaijan, turning azerbaijan into a powerful state to challenge iranian hegemony in the region.
ii- Similarly, the turkmen, kurd, and afghan regions could be merged into those countries.
iii- the baluchis, though a very small iranian ethnicity could together with Pakistani baluchis be created into an independent nation that would control the strait of hormuz and the sea traffic flowing into iran, remaining pakistan and afghanistan.
3- saudi arabia: Saud created saudi arabia out of warring arab tribes. These tribes could again be incorporated into
small sheikdoms the size of qatar.
B- The organization of islamic conference brought together the fusion of the entire islamic resource in western intelligence, turning the islamic resource in western intelligence into a mini islamic agency within the western intelligence community.
The absence of western translators might have robbed the islamic cadres of the necessary checks and balances and allowed the muslims to run their own intelligence service within the western intelligence community.
By using terror groups in conjunction with these islamic cadres, the islamic govts could impose any agenda on the west.
we need to replace islamic translators with western linguists, and westerners, latinos and africans as the majority in teams that operate in the islamic world. Islamic moles should again be directly controlled by western operators with no islamic intermediaries to commandeer them.
C- islamic WMD's and missles pose the most significant threat to the civilized world.
i- we should encourage india to take Pakistan out. Russia and many other nations could then provide the troops for peacekeeping, while we carve it into independent nations.
ii- we should let israel take the iranian nuclear installations out and provide them with whatever tools and help that might be needed to do that. A peace keeping force should then be assembled for both iran and lebanon, while iran is carved up into small ethnic states.
D- Hardwork and dedication can transform these theories into reality.
we would still have been in the stone ages with no semblances of either scientific or human development, if it weren't for theories turned into reality through hard work.
Likewise all these measures against the islamic world can be realized, if the west has the long term will and dedication to see it through.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies
Dealing with terrorist states like iran and pakistan: Leanning from missed opportunities.
Posted by jerrydavenport to jerrydavenport
On Bloggers & Personal 08/21/2004 2:18:49 PM EDT · 2 of 27
A study of Islamic history from the early 20th century through the present day, helps us draw parallels to use the same solution to deal with Islamic militarism and terror.
The ottoman empire was the source of islamic expansionism and militarism till the ottoman empire was reduced to just one ethnicity, the turks, and secular rule established there to emphasize turkish ethnic sentiment over islamic sentiment. We need to similarly carve up all islamic expansionist powers into small ethnic states emphasizing ethnic sentiment over islamic sentiment.
The west also needs to replace islamic translators with western linguists to prevent the islamic world from running their own mini intelligence service in the midst of western intelligence.
Fig 1 shows how the ottoman empire was first reduced to turkey to rob it of the infrastructure and resources to aspire for a world role. Turkey was then purged of all islamic sentiment by a secularist leader like kemal attaturk.
Fig 1- transformation of islamist ottoman empire into secular turkey
if i were to explain this in steps.
i- The ottoman empire was first of all reduced to just one ethnicity, the turks.
ii- Kemal attaturk then emphasized this turkish ethnicity over islamic senitment.
today, we need to do the same with the three major sponsors of terror.
1- carve them into small ethnic states to rob them of the infrastructure and resources to pursue terror, WMD or large armies.
2- Put secularists like kemal attaturk in charge of these ethnic states to purge them of all islamic sentiment.
<![if !supportLineBreakNewLine]>
<![endif]>
Fig a- iran's neighboring countries
i- Fig-a shows iran's neighboring nations, while Fig 2 shows the break up of iran. It shows how the azerisareas of iran could be merged with azerbaijan to bring azerbaijan up to challenge iranian power. Similarly parts of iran could be merged with turkeministan, afghanistan and kurds areas. Iranian baluchistan could be merged with the pakistani baluchistan into an independent state to control all iranian sea traffic through the strait of hormuz.
Fig 2- The breakup of islamist Iran into secular ethnic states
ii- Fig 3 shows how Pakistani sind and baluchistan could be formed into independent countries, giving the west access to all Pakistani ports and mineral resource. It also shows how islamist pashtun and punjab areas could be incorporated into central asia and india to subdue the islamic sentiment.
Fig 3- transformation of islamist Pakistan into secular ethnic states
iii- Fig 4 shows that saudi arabia could be similarly broken up into numerous small states the size of qatar to prevent
it's oil wealth from being used to sponsor islamic terror or political movements.
Fig 4 - The breakup of saudi arabia into secular states like qatar and oman
iv- Fig 5 shows how islamic countries use terror groups in collaboration with islamic cadres in western intelligence to achieve their policy goals.
Fig 5- islamic manipulation of western policy through terror
To thwart this, we need to force islamic state sponsors of terror to crack down on terror groups, while we replace islamic translators in western intelligence with western linguists to monitor the islamic cadres to prevent the muslims from running their own mini intelligence service right within the midst of western intelligence.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies
Dealing with terrorist states like iran and pakistan: Leanning from missed opportunities.
Posted by jerrydavenport
On Bloggers & Personal 08/21/2004 2:16:36 PM EDT · 26 replies · 81+ views
jerrydavenport.blogspot.com ^
the west, blinded by it's islamic cadres has lost many opportunities in the past. 1- In 1998, Iran almost got sucked into a war with the taliban over the killing of iranian diplomats.The west again didn't capitalize on that. This war would have sucked iran into a guerilla war that would have eventually burried the iranian hardliners and destroyed the taliban . This would also have pitted hizbollah and al qaeda against each other and literally routed the entire islamic camp with it. This war would have also dragged Pakistan into the conflict as Pakistan was the backer of the...
Read | Comments
Islamic terror and political manipulations
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson; Sabertooth; Ragtime Cowgirl
On Bloggers & Personal 08/20/2004 6:57:56 PM EDT · 4 of 7
As far as islamic cadres within western intelligence are concerned.
1- Al qaeda and pakistan's nuclear program should never have happened, since western intelligence should have had
a very sizeable intelligence resource in the region, considering the war against the soviets.
These two developments couldn't have taken place without a betrayal by islamic cadres.
2- Similarly, if iran's reform movement really is a credible resource, we wouldn't have had to rely on libya's disclosures to learn about the iranian nuclear program.
iran and pakistan's missile program should have been dealt with in the early 90's, right after the first gulf war.
while the wahhabisation of saudi arabia should never have taken place, if the west had kept a close tab on developments within the country.
3- In my opinion, there's a dire need for the west to replace islamic translators with western translators, since their work doesn't require blending into islamic cultures.
4-Furthermore all intelligence teams and committees should have a western, latino or african majority to prevent the muslims from commandeering the teams with their agenda and lies.
5- islamic moles should again be operated directly by western operators and shouldn't be allowed to come into contact with each other to prevent them from forming a lobby, covering up for each other or from being compromised, pressured or
bought off by others.
6- it is quite possible that most of the muslims end up as double agents, feeding the west crap, while passing important policy information to their respective countries, sects or parties.
6- As far as liberal muslims are concerned, well If a muslim is really a liberal, he would give his wife and daughters the same freedoms as western women. If he doesn't, his liberal views are just a charade and he is just abusing western freedoms, not really believing in them.
Muslims who aren't ideologically in sync with western ideals, should only be employed, if their particular position is crucial to western interests. They should further never be trusted and never allowed to handle information, other than that, which they are required to provide to the west, So that they are not in a position to pressure or compromise others.
their numbers should again be very small to prevent them from commandeering thecommittees with their islamic agenda or lies.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies
Islamic terror and political manipulations
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson; Sabertooth; Ragtime Cowgirl
On Bloggers & Personal 08/20/2004 6:11:46 PM EDT · 3 of 7
All islamic terrorists would have to either belong to an islamic political party or would be a part of some mosque or seminary circle for logistical, training and intelligence reasons. I don't believe they could operate as small groups, without hooking up into a major islamic stream.
By watching islamic seminaries,mosques,and political parties, we could cover most of the gathering places for such zealots.
Furthermore, islamic missionaries who travel from country to country could serve as the couriers or the communication links for these terror groups.
ultimately there has to be some islamic country behind them to provide them with training camps etc.
we need to logically narrow the list down.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies
Islamic terror and political manipulations
Posted by jerrydavenport to SJackson; Sabertooth; Ragtime Cowgirl; katy4now
On Bloggers & Personal 08/20/2004 5:55:48 PM EDT · 2 of 7
take a look. Copy and paste the URL's to look at the rough diagrams
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies
Islamic terror and political manipulations
Posted by jerrydavenport
On Bloggers & Personal 08/20/2004 5:54:00 PM EDT · 6 replies · 47+ views
jerrydavenport.blogspot.com ^
I have followed developments in the islamic world for over 2 decades now. When i try to connect the different dots, i get the following picture of the islamic world.
http://www.msnusers.com Fig 1 shows how islamic govt's use terror groups in conjunction with islamic cadres in western intelligence to shapewestern policy towards the islamic world and draw concessions from the west.
http://www.msnusers.com Fig 2 shows how pan islamic parties like jamiati islami and countries like Pakistan bridge the chasm between the wahhabi and the shiite world to bring the two different islamic terror camps together. Now Pan islamists are muslims...
Read | Comments
Radical cleric in talks to leave shrine
Posted by jerrydavenport to The Scourge of Yazid
On News/Activism 08/15/2004 4:35:55 AM EDT · 58 of 61
This guy has no place in modern iraq.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies
Links Between Prison and AIDS Affecting Blacks Inside and Out
Posted by jerrydavenport to Darksheare; nopardons; Ragtime Cowgirl; NRA2BFree
On News/Activism 08/15/2004 4:30:46 AM EDT · 357 of 532
ragtime cowgirl: None of this post is directed at you, so please don't take offense to it.
it doesn't take rocket science to tell talent from crap.
take a look at america. It's the greatest power on earth.
It's one of the richest, and most technologically and socially advanced nations on earth.
Now, america is nothing, but the talent, work ethic, practices and values of it's people manifest in it's development.
if america lacked talent, it wouldn't have been the greatest nation on earth.
Now take a look at some of the third world islamic countries;
they've not been able to kick the dole for decades. they can't boast of either an industry or agriculture They can't boast of technology, human rights or education either.
You'll find unbridled corruption, rampant inefficiencies and bad work ethic, literally ruin their economies.
You'll also see a general respect for human life, manifest in terror, civil strife, turoil and crime. You'd see that both private citizens and govts indulge in abuses against mankind, because of a general disrespect for life.
You won't find any semblances of either technological or human development in these countries. The UNDP rates their
human resource as crap, placing them at the rock bottom of the human development index.
these countries again are nothing , but the talent, ethics, practices and values of their people, manifest in their destruction.
if there was talent in these countries, they wouldn't have failed miserably in every area or been such a mess.
Now immigrants from these countries would take the same destruction with them, wherever they went.
The question is, do we really need to turn our country into the rot these immigrants crawled out of.
nopardons:
It takes him quite an effort to realize what another person is saying. It further takes him an embarassment to realize, what he himself said. LOL
For example, he contradicted me by saying that i wrongly bunched the whole of latin america together,pointing to the differences bewteen the portugese and spanish.
Now, while attempting to negate me, he was infact reinforcing my views without even realizing it, when he said that both portugese and spanish had their origin in the romance group of languages;
He had to first struggle to disprove what i had said to arrive at the same conclusion himself, because it wouldn't come to him easy.
He has an IQ shortfall, because of which he always falls short of the correct conclusion, not quite making it
all the way.He also has a crippling knowledge deficit, which makes him cry heresy, each time he is presented with even widely accepted facts.
This intellectual cripple then laughs other people off, when he can't defend his non sensical meanderings.
I couldn't care less about the sex of a person on a political forum. This isn't exactly a match making service..lol
Well a conservative who opposes christianity would be a liberal right? YOu need to use that brain of yours more often, it provides good amusement.
conservative jewish people don't oppose christianity, they rather think of themselves as having the same roots as christians, since christ was a jew.
sofa btw is again archaic.
Darksheare:
Well i don't want to be rude, but most of your postings aren't even intelligent enough to solicit a reply.
As for narcissim. Well It seems to be plaguing both you and nopardons.
I was discussing crime and poverty. You guys were the ones berating black people and looking down on them from your
self deluding crap heap.
You fail to realize that black and white americans share the same language, cultural practices and a common history.
You guys were the ones talking in derogative terms about other people, i merely painted you with our own slime to make you realize that you people, not the ones you were ridiculing, were the trash.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies