[jerrydavenport]

I would tolerate gays, because they are human and have the same rights as everyone.

it's their world as much as it is ours.

But i would never support or praise gay relationships, because it's something that is against basic human nature and simply sick.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Are you equally willing to tolerate adult child "relationships"? How about cousin "relationships"? Other family "relationships"? Animal "relationships"? Group "relationships"?

[Darksheare]

NOW We know why you're so adamant that everyone else is sick, liberal, muslim, or inbred.

[TheCrusader]

"I would tolerate gays, because they are human and have the same rights as everyone. it's their world as much as it is ours."

Unless and until science proves conclusively that homosexual acts are genetically ordered and not morally disorded lasciviousness that lampoons human nature and frustrates Divine intention, I'll never believe that "it's as much their world as it is ours". It's only as much "their world" as we as a society allow it to be.

I'm sure they have the right to exist in peace so that perhaps they might allow their God-given instincts to rise up one day and overthrow their perverted lusts, but the devious acts they perform on one another, and the disease that incubates and spreads as a result, should absolutely never be accepted or embraced by our society, or considered as "part of our world". I think homosexuality is straight from hell.

[nopardons]

If homosexuals have the same "rights" as everyone else,then do you think that they should be allowed to have same sex weddings and all of the same rights and privileges as heterosexual married couples?