Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well we know how the far left will treat this, but I'm wondering what the MSM (in the US) will do. Or what Kerry's campaign will do. It worries me because these people have no shame. They'll do anything to win.
1 posted on 09/06/2004 3:53:17 AM PDT by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: ejdrapes
The Swiftees have spiked this. Kerry can't use it - it will be too hypocritical even for the Dims.
2 posted on 09/06/2004 3:56:08 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

Here's a prediction. The Kerry campaign will claim that Bush didn't take the flight physical because the urine test would show he used drugs.


3 posted on 09/06/2004 3:56:19 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

Clinton: The Boy With The Far Away Eyes.

4 posted on 09/06/2004 3:56:41 AM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes
Yeah, and Kitty Kelly said Sinatra and Nancy Reagan were getting it on in the White House under Ronnie's nose. Anyone who believes this woman's tripe needs to have their voting privileges yanked - too dumb to vote.

Of course, the MSM will lap this up like my cats lap up Fancy Feast!
5 posted on 09/06/2004 3:56:53 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

Klink had 2 trips to the dry-out clinic (coke), committed treason, rape and was elected twice. Why discard such a tried and true formula???


6 posted on 09/06/2004 4:00:16 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

LOL. This stuff is going to have people in stitches. And if the RATS try using it, God help them, they might even lose DC.


8 posted on 09/06/2004 4:02:10 AM PDT by jerod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

The American people know and love the GWB of today. These rumors are about a GWB from some previous time.

Kitty Kelly is not credible.

I'm not worried about this lame attempt to bring down our president.












9 posted on 09/06/2004 4:02:23 AM PDT by alnick (US forces armed with what? Spitballs??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

Too obvious, won't work. But hey if they want to attack Laura, then it's open season on Gigilo Kerrys checkbook.


10 posted on 09/06/2004 4:04:42 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

W has been immunized by his prior run. They have already thrown the good stuff at him. LOL


11 posted on 09/06/2004 4:07:55 AM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

What a crock. Why bother to post this junk?


14 posted on 09/06/2004 4:14:24 AM PDT by Dustbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes
Sharon Bush also claimed that the baby of her ex husband's new wife was his child born out of wedlock.

A DNA test proved the baby was fathered by the woman's husband.

We get an idea of just how venal Sharon Bush is and ought not forget it. Also explains why she's been divorced.

21 posted on 09/06/2004 4:26:55 AM PDT by OldFriend (GIVE EM ZELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

--------------------------------
To print out and wear as a Campaign Button, go HERE. Over 4,200 hits as of 9/5! Feel free to reuse this anywhere you wish...
Donate to Swift Boat Vets for the Truth HERE.

23 posted on 09/06/2004 4:33:38 AM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

If I'm not mistaken, Sharon Bush was shown to have falsely accused her ex-husband Neil of fathering a child out of wedlock.


24 posted on 09/06/2004 4:36:39 AM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

This book will have no significance whatsoever. It might get a day or two of coverage and then dropped like a hot brick.

W's campaign is ready for this.


26 posted on 09/06/2004 4:49:24 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes
Bush has admitted being an alcoholic but, asked during the 1999 election if he did drugs, he said: "I've told the American people that years ago I made some mistakes. "I've learned from my mistakes and should I be fortunate enough to become president I will bring dignity and honour to the office." Later an aide clarified his remarks saying Bush hadn't taken illegal drugs in the past 25 years.

I would like to offer a talking point/rebuttal. Everyone has things in their past they are ashamed of. The difference is President Bush learns from his experiences and mistakes. John Kerry doesn't. He has never admitted to or apologized for anything in his past. Who would you prefer to lead our nation someone who can grow and mature or someone who still reacts to things as a juvenile?

27 posted on 09/06/2004 4:49:57 AM PDT by armymarinedad (Proud father of death from above)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes
It never ceases to amaze me that the Left, most of whom have or are partaking of illicit drugs, attempt to smear opponents with the charge of "drug user".

Aren't they mainly for the free use of drugs? I'll admit, in my youth I did illegal drugs. Millions did. It's not something we wear like a badge of honor. We grew up. We matured. We reconciled ourselves with adult ways.

In any event, only the most partisan and anal retentive will give any such charges the slightest bit of weight or dignity. It's either desperate lies and innuendo to try and derail the Bush campaign, or it's a final shot to the collective brain stem of the Kerry campaign.

Pick one.

28 posted on 09/06/2004 4:50:09 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Ron Reagan has slipped the surly bonds of Earth and touched the face of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes
The Dems have NO FACTS so for them since there is no such thing as absolute truth
ALL truth is relative...and there is only ONE SIN

Not getting what you want....

Lies are just as good as truth when all you care about is keeping yourself in power....

Jesus once said that Satan was a liar from the beginning and the 'father of all lies'....
and that you would know the truth and the truth would set you free.....

If satan is the father of all lies (and all liars).....it's not a great leap to recognize who his kids are

imo
30 posted on 09/06/2004 4:54:25 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

"His wife Laura also allegedly tried cannabis in her youth."

Oh, noes! Quick, Laura! Say you didn't inhale and all will be forgiven!!!!!

APf


31 posted on 09/06/2004 4:56:24 AM PDT by APFel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

Can't the Bush family sue her for libel?


32 posted on 09/06/2004 4:57:16 AM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ejdrapes

AOL news is leading with missing Bush military records. The press is just beginning to fight, people.


33 posted on 09/06/2004 4:58:25 AM PDT by Luke21 (Christ is wonderful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson