Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Questions On Bush Guard Duty [CBS USES FORGERIES TO SMEAR THE PRESIDENT!!!!!]
CBS ^ | 9/10/04 | Staff

Posted on 09/09/2004 7:33:57 AM PDT by TastyManatees

New Questions On Bush Guard Duty

CBS) The military records of the two men running for president have become part of the political arsenal in this campaign – a tool for building up, or blowing up, each candidate’s credibility as America's next commander-in-chief.

While Sen. Kerry has been targeted for what he did in Vietnam, President Bush has been criticized for avoiding Vietnam by landing a spot in the Texas Air National Guard - and then failing to meet some of his obligations.

Did then-Lt. Bush fulfill all of his military obligations? And just how did he land that spot in the National Guard in the first place? Correspondent Dan Rather has new information on the president’s military service – and the first-ever interview with the man who says he pulled strings to get young George W. Bush into the Texas Air National Guard.

...

But 60 Minutes has obtained a number of documents we are told were taken from Col. Killian's personal file. Among them, a never-before-seen memorandum from May 1972, where Killian writes that Lt. Bush called him to talk about "how he can get out of coming to drill from now through November."

Lt. Bush tells his commander "he is working on a campaign in Alabama…. and may not have time to take his physical." Killian adds that he thinks Lt. Bush has gone over his head, and is "talking to someone upstairs."

Col. Killian died in 1984. 60 Minutes consulted a handwriting analyst and document expert who believes the material is authentic.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; 60minutes; bush; camejo; cbs; ccrm; cheney; dubya; edwards; election; forgery; fraud; gwb; kerry; killian; nader; napalminthemorning; nationalguard; pilot; seebsnews; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 941-945 next last
To: TomGuy
...given these memos by an unnamed someone they refuse to identify who claimed the memos came from Killian's file.

You don't suppose Kerry's been using his typewriter again? Maybe the African Queen even bought him a new one.;^)

261 posted on 09/09/2004 9:51:30 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: BlessedByLiberty

LOL! True about the psychic! LOL.

This guy Killian would be rolling over in his grave, I think. The military takes great pride in structure and these mistakes stand out like a sore thumb. I hope CBS recants the entire mess.


262 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:06 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: LOSERLIBERALS
It would not matter to me if Bush was awol

That's sweet.

But the issue is he was not AWOL. There is nothing that supports such an allegation and your feelings aside, the lie should not go unchallenged.

263 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:09 AM PDT by cyncooper (We're mad as Zell and we're not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Yep. Occam's Razor is screaming out FORGERY! I can't wait to hear Dan Rather's "correction."

(As if he ever will.)

264 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:18 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I think it's interesting that CBS is keeping mum on who gave them the documents. What's the big secret? (wink wink)

Hello, Terry!

265 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:23 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

FWIW, when I was in the Army, memos and forms would be dated 4 May 1972 never, ever, "04 May 1972". The leading zero on the date is very suspicous to me. Anyone else smell a rat, or is just me?


266 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:34 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("And oftentimes, to win us to our harm, the instruments of darkness tell us truths")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

"Could it do superscripts with reduced font size like in memos 1 and 4?"

Yup, it could. A superscript "th" and "st" were available. They were treated as a single character and were one of the characters above the numbers. It was an option. IBM sold Executive typewriters with a whole range of special characters, for foreign languages, mathematics, etc. You wouldn't believe.


267 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:38 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA
Col. Killian died in 1984.

Even so, what do you want to bet he votes for Kerry in November?

Thanks for the ping.

268 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:43 AM PDT by Ima Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

I think you are likely mistaken, for the simple reason that these are being touted as "just discovered" documents. I could be wrong on this, of course, but the hubbub over them wouldn't make sense if they'd been previously issued.


269 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:51 AM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Beelzebubba; PhilDragoo; Grampa Dave
Holy Crap! Kerry's 1972 DD214 used non-existant proportional type?????

This really needs to be another thread.

Everyone - Check out post #155 for details.

270 posted on 09/09/2004 9:52:53 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

Another note. The sig on the left looks like a fountain pen. The one on the right is either ball point or rollerball. Did they have rollerball pens in 1972? Also the script looks like that of a left hander, with an almost feminine light touch c/w the other sig.


271 posted on 09/09/2004 9:53:30 AM PDT by boop (Testing the tagline feature!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; Grampa Dave
...given these memos by an unnamed someone they refuse to identify who claimed the memos came from Killian's file.

You don't suppose Kerry's been using his typewriter again? Maybe the African Queen even bought him a new one.;^)

Got that John FORGES Kerry pic handy?

272 posted on 09/09/2004 9:53:51 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

They will be if they don't keep their mouths shut.


273 posted on 09/09/2004 9:53:59 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Chieftain
Get the word out CBS is a FRAUD!!

Is Tom Hays working for CBS now?

274 posted on 09/09/2004 9:54:16 AM PDT by citizen (Write-in Tom Tancredo for President/Jeff Flake VP 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Are there any other documents in Bush's file generated by this Killian guy?


275 posted on 09/09/2004 9:54:25 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
It was the Xerox Altos system (perhaps not yet for sale to the public), a precursor to the Mac (and which Apple largely copied, including the "mouse" interface.) The resume was in beautifully proportionately spaced fonts.

That was the Alto, a 12 bit microcoded Nova with a full page graphic interface and a whopping 1-2 MB hard disk. These machines were never for sale to the public though they did go to a few universities and to the White House. I used one for several years at Xerox PARC until they were replaced by the Dandylions and Dorados. Fine machines all.

regards,

276 posted on 09/09/2004 9:55:02 AM PDT by Mycroft Holmes (Fnord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

You have snatched the pebble from the forger's palm, Honorable Grasshopper!

Chalk up another solid kill for the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy's Digital Brownshirts!


277 posted on 09/09/2004 9:55:32 AM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

Thanks! I am glad you are on it too! :)


278 posted on 09/09/2004 9:55:34 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth

I had a USAF Lt Col in ROTC. He kept a typewriter next to his desk and typed up all his own stuff.


279 posted on 09/09/2004 9:55:50 AM PDT by Bogey78O (John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The military details in the documents make sense.

that may be true, but how do you explain the word processing details, specifically the reduced font superscript on a 1972 typewritten memo. There were no typewriters capable of doing that in 1972 and in order to have the reduced font superscript, one had to use a TYPESETTER and what are the odds that a National Guard memo would be printed on a typesetter? One would only do that if they had planned on making a couple hundred copies of the document and it would have been done in a printing facility and not in the commander's office.

280 posted on 09/09/2004 9:56:21 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 941-945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson