Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to out O'Reilly
9/15/04 | Josh in PA

Posted on 09/15/2004 5:13:27 PM PDT by Josh in PA

O'Reilly just said no WMDs in Iraq is the same situation as CBS coming up with forged memos.

And that Michael Moore's reaction to WMDs is the same as the right-wings reaction forged memos.

Time to out this creep for what he is. A self-indulgant phoney.

I've never been so outraged in my entire life. You expect crap from the mainstream press, but the guy "looking out for you" is only looking out for Bill O'Reilly and how he can get elected to public office.

What a disgrace.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: effeminate; familyhater; feminist; foxnews; goddessworshipper; homophobia; homosexual; manhater; nambla; oreilly; sodomite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2004 5:13:28 PM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Amemn

Read This http://www.hundredpercenter.com/TheNoSpineZone.html


2 posted on 09/15/2004 5:15:01 PM PDT by www.hunderdpercenter.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Its like he goes to extremes just for the sake of appearing to be "neutral", even when there is no intellectual arguement to support it. NOBODY can be THAT neutral. I think he positions himself publicly to appear this way so he can boast about being non-partisan. I dont buy it. I think its pretty transparent now.


3 posted on 09/15/2004 5:16:46 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

O'reilly "jumped the shark" when he tried to discredit the swiftboat vets. i have been angry with him for a long time, but this finally did it for me.
looking for himself and no one else!!


4 posted on 09/15/2004 5:17:37 PM PDT by swlabr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Much like CBS, O'Reilly is digging a deeper hole for himself. He doesn't understand that the libs hate him, so alienating conservatives will land him back on another tabloid show, if he's lucky.


5 posted on 09/15/2004 5:18:39 PM PDT by Jenya (Buy Unfit for Command. Donate to Swiftvets.com. It's your American duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
So just how DID all those thousands die that were murdered by Saddam?

If you want the Weapons of Mass Destruction, try tracking the Iraq cache of Chem/Bio/Nuc things to Syria. Check out the "caves" that are in that country -- you'll likely find some of Iraq's things stored.
6 posted on 09/15/2004 5:19:44 PM PDT by Trunk 71-74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swlabr

O Reilly , fell out of Grace with me, a long, long time ago, his smug condescending attitude of knowing it all, turns me off. More than that O'Reilly is reduced to playing the ratings game, call it O' Reilly Overdose.


7 posted on 09/15/2004 5:21:21 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776 ((John Kerry is now in full retreat))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

O'Reilley is Toast, Savage and Ingram will slow roast him over a talk radio fire. He's just Jealous of Brit Hume's and Sean Hannity's new ratings. "Pride goeth before a fall".


8 posted on 09/15/2004 5:23:22 PM PDT by docman57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trunk 71-74

"So just how DID all those thousands die that were murdered by Saddam?"


Remember...Saddam was a SOCIALIST (Ba'ath Socialist party). Hitler was too.

Don't let the left get away with the Big Lie anymore.


9 posted on 09/15/2004 5:23:34 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: swlabr

It was the Pat Rousch incident that did it for me on O'Reilly. Boy, he really looked out for her /sarc.


10 posted on 09/15/2004 5:25:20 PM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: swlabr

It was the Pat Rousch incident that did it for me on O'Reilly. Boy, he really looked out for her /sarc. NOT!


11 posted on 09/15/2004 5:25:31 PM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

A caller on Savage just suggested that O'Twitly may be trying for Rather's job, when CBS cans him (which I think they will.)

O'Twitly is a smug, self-serving jerk. I quit watching him over a year ago.


12 posted on 09/15/2004 5:25:57 PM PDT by EggsAckley (............."but let them go naked for a while".......scary Terri Kerry............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
For the WMD/memo analogy to work, Bush would have to plant fake WMDs, say they were there all along, ignore all evidence to the contrary and continue to beat his chest.

Sorry O'Reilly. You're a half-ass Catholic, half-ass reporter and half-ass Republican.
13 posted on 09/15/2004 5:25:57 PM PDT by practicalmom (And you should be required to turn in your "O")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Fear not Laura comes on in a few minutes and she will kick his ass all over NYC.


14 posted on 09/15/2004 5:28:09 PM PDT by rodguy911 ( President Reagan---all the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Well, you're right as to the Iraq WMD situation. We cannot at all be sure there were no WMD in Iraq until we know what went over the border or may still be undetected. And it is irritating when Mr. O does his "split-the-blanket" routine and thereby dodges getting at the truth. And his self-appointed role as a "balancer" of "right" and "left" is disturbing when it causes him to spin and back off of the truth. Some of this tendency seems to come from his historical ignorance (on what happened in Vietnam, e.g.) or from an inability to perceive practical solutions stemming from ignorance of technical matters (e.g., his "solution" to the oil problem consisting of depriving individuals of vehicle choices.) Over all he's a pretty good entertainer but he is right when he identifies himself as the only one allowed to bloviate on his show. His ration of bloviation to actual hard-nosed investigation does seem to be on the rise, the mark of one surrounded by too many yes men. But the "new media" as it consolidates its power, will in turn become much like the old media.


15 posted on 09/15/2004 5:29:01 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
You are absolutely right, you can tell most of his show is contrived, you can't fool the audience.
16 posted on 09/15/2004 5:29:25 PM PDT by rodguy911 ( President Reagan---all the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

I have always detested O'Reilly. So I totally concur.


17 posted on 09/15/2004 5:31:03 PM PDT by BunnySlippers ("F" Stands for FLIP-FLOP ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA


He must really hate us Right Wingers. He lies almost daily about us. He forges more DOCs. then Cbs!!


18 posted on 09/15/2004 5:31:13 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
O'Reilly just said no WMDs in Iraq is the same situation as CBS coming up with forged memos.

Except that virtually every intel agency and public official (Kerry, Clinton, Bush, Biden) had believed WMDs were in Iraq at some time within the last 1 to 5 years.

OTOH, no expert is willing to validate the memos, nor have they from the get go.

O'Reilly has a few cheap intellectual tricks: the strawman, the tautology, the quod erat demonstratum. Let him preach to his "moderate" audience.

19 posted on 09/15/2004 5:31:50 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
AND NOW WE KNOW! DAN RATHER IS SUPPOSED TO APPEAR ON O'REILLY TOMORROW!!!!!!!!!

Could we expect anything but kneepads from him, if the jerk is showing up tomorrow?

20 posted on 09/15/2004 5:31:57 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson