Skip to comments.
CBS Statement to Affiliates [much more detailed statement given to affiliates than to public]
Little Green Footballs ^
| September 15, 2004
| Charles
Posted on 09/15/2004 5:44:51 PM PDT by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: John Jorsett
thank you for posting this
To: John Jorsett
They must think the affiliates are idiots, too.
But you-know-what flows downhill, and the affiliates will feel the effect of people tuning out long before the net will. Or before the net will care.
Advice for the affiliates: Grow a pair.
3
posted on
09/15/2004 5:47:09 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: John Jorsett
Any word on the attachments?
If so, please post or provide link.
4
posted on
09/15/2004 5:47:17 PM PDT
by
bjc
(Attachments?)
To: John Jorsett
But CBS News background reporting determined that Staudt remained a powerful figure in the Guard for years after his retirement, ...
Wishful thinking by CBS but that is clearly bunk!
5
posted on
09/15/2004 5:47:52 PM PDT
by
Radix
(This Tag line is fake, but the contents are real.)
To: John Jorsett
However, she confirms that the content of the memos does reflect the feelings of Lt. Col. Killian at the time and accurately portrays events that were taking place in connection with then-Lt. Bushs Texas Air National Guard service.Regarding which, see this: Real Killian Memo Praises Bush.
6
posted on
09/15/2004 5:48:43 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(Kerry-Edwards: FORGING AHEAD)
To: mewzilla
Through all of the frenzied debate of the past week, the basic content of the 60 MINUTES Wednesday report - that President Bush received preferential treatment to gain entrance to the Texas Air National Guard and that he may not have fulfilled all of the requirements has not been substantially challenged.CBS to its affiliates: Screw you.
7
posted on
09/15/2004 5:48:50 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: John Jorsett
CBS says forgers are entitled to confidentality. CBS is openly aiding and abettng a felony.
8
posted on
09/15/2004 5:48:58 PM PDT
by
Lexington Green
(I'm voting with our soldiers.)
To: John Jorsett
Thanks for the info. I thought the people at CBS were grownups, but that doesn't look to be the case.
They have no idea how serious this is. They're going to find out.
9
posted on
09/15/2004 5:49:43 PM PDT
by
68skylark
To: John Jorsett
Even their own liberal witness says the memos are NOT genuine! Sheesh, when you come right down to it, Marian Carr Knox doesn't add much in support of what Dan Rather and Mary Mapes are looking for other than her opinion about Bush. Is this the hat great journalists hang their careers on? Tonight's show brings to mind the old saw to the effect you can't make something out of nothing. They're just too deep in it now to back out and admit there's ZIP, ZERO, ZILCH NADA to their story.
10
posted on
09/15/2004 5:49:59 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Of possible interest ping.
11
posted on
09/15/2004 5:49:59 PM PDT
by
Radix
(This Tag line is fake, but the contents are real.)
To: John Jorsett
For the proposed third debate:
Third presidential debate:
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ
Wednesday, October 13
Bob Schieffer
CBS News Chief Washington Correspondent, and Moderator, Face the Nation
from:
http://www.debates.org/pages/news_040813.html
but if President Bush holds to only 2 debates (as he should), the SeeBS guy gets "cut out of the pattern" and then Bob can blame Dan for screwing things up. Maybe THAT will get Dopey Dan fired!
To: John Jorsett
"...whose personal memos were part of a report on last Wednesdays (8) 60 MINUTES broadcast..."
To: Lexington Green
Let's review:
"Additionally, Mary Mapes, the producer of the report and a well-respected, veteran journalist whose credibility has never been questioned, has been following this story for more than five years. She has a vast and detailed knowledge of the issues surrounding President Bushs service in the Guard and of the individuals involved in the story. Before the report was broadcast, it was vetted and screened in accordance with CBS News standards by several veteran 60 MINUTES Wednesday senior producers and CBS News executives.
Five years....and they NEVER talked to Marian Knox until TODAY?????
14
posted on
09/15/2004 5:51:24 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(Proud to be a Reagan Alumna!)
To: John Jorsett
The editorial content of the report was not based solely on the physical documents, but also on numerous credible sources who supported what the documents said.Unsaid: The other sources are no more credible than the documents.
Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp
15
posted on
09/15/2004 5:52:17 PM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Buy and read "Right Angles and Other Obstinate Truths." Well, buy it anyway, OK?)
To: John Jorsett
Once again, CBS is trying to escape the kill zone and move it broader ground. But they have admitted only have photocopies, which cannot be authenticated and are only claiming the documents
could have been typed -- but the claim is categorical and categorically false.
Moreover, they are still using the contents of the photocopies to build their claim, such as the supposed interference of Col Staudt. So the focus of the attack on CBS must remain their photocopies of unknown provenance.
To: John Jorsett
..CBS News states that it will redouble its efforts to continue reporting aggressively on all aspects of the story,.. They didn't have ONE person on to talk about the fraud aspect, or the source, or whether they had the orginal documents, or why the originals were not available, or....
What a bunch of Dan Rather
To: John Jorsett
To: John Jorsett
Oh Sheesh! Pretty thin proof - because the producer has hated Bush for 5 years - I mean been on the story for 5 years - 1/2 their examiners are gone and what they have left didn't see any originals! Again, sheesh!
DKK
19
posted on
09/15/2004 5:54:28 PM PDT
by
LifeTrek
(<-- Uses Times New Roman just like 60 minutes! (http://lifetrek.blogspot.com))
To: John Jorsett
So, let me get this straight.
We're supposed to believe this lady over and above Killian's wife and son?
Killian's son has said that Knox was just in a secretarial pool, not Killian's secretary.
This is just unbelievable!
20
posted on
09/15/2004 5:55:00 PM PDT
by
NavySEAL F-16
(Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson