So from Burkett to Moore to Barnes/Rather to Dan Rather?
Robin Rather is his daughter....for starters. Where is she from in Texas?
I don't see Barnes going to a Kinkos with this. He is too much a public figure.
That poor Kinko's manager must be getting hammered right about now!!
Whichever GWB basher did it will see his credibility plummet. My money is on Burkett.
Am I nuts or was this story covered in similar detail during the 2000-campaign (Karen Hughes, Dan Bartlett, speakerphone, etc.)?
As Clinton would say, "I did not have sex with that woman". These guys are unreal...what sleeze bags.
Something tells me that David Van Os, who is Burkett's atty according to the news that broke yesterday, is involved.
He has done much work with the Democrats...Including being one of the Florida Gore lawyers who tried to steal the 2000 election.
He is also running for Texas Supreme Court.
ALSO.....Robin Rather...and Ben "Sharpstown Bank Scandal" Barnes.
There is just too much close connection going on.
And it may all lead to the DNC.
Check out this web page I found. It contains some of the writings of Bill Burkett. Maybe someone should compare the language usage patterns to see if there are similarities with the CBS document.
http://michael-friedman.com/archives/000139.html
There are more documents in the pipeline. Check the Washington Post story. I can't breathe.
That would explain this thread then. Looks like we may have found our source... maybe...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1217366/posts
UNCOMFORTABLE
BURKETT: And the third point occurred approximately 10 days later in which, in a very roundabout way, I ended up guided to the state museum, the old state museum facility, where I was introduced in the form of a very informal conversation. And I saw files on a table. But I also saw at the edge of that table a 15-gallon, roughly 15- gallon, old-style waste can, metal waste can.
At the top of that were several pages, 20 to 40 pages, approximately. I glanced down at the top of those documents. In ink was the word Bush, George W., 1LT. This was a performance report. I did something that I probably should not have done. I was right at the trash can. I filtered through the top five or six pages in that. And they were all copies and originals of old performance documents and pay records for Bush, George W., 1LT.
ZAHN: And what was so damaging about what you saw and why would those documents be thrown away?
BURKETT: I can't answer the question why those documents would be thrown away. A personnel file contains all of the positive and any potential negative things. It's an administrative file, is all that it is. But it contains every history. It is the pure paper trail. And the Army and military and all government entities, but certainly the Army and Air Force, have the most redundant paper trail that there is in the entire world.
(CROSSTALK) ZAHN: But, in your own words, you were only able to filter through some of the top pages. In your reading of those pages, did you see anything that would have been particularly embarrassing to the governor at that point?
BURKETT: I did not scrutinize the files itself, but I think it was the action that struck me more than anything else.
But I think also, even through my shock and maybe my disappointment, remember, I was working in the administration of Governor George W. Bush. And everything that I did as the team chief for a strategic planning effort that was going to make the Texas National Guard more effective, more efficient, and more relevant to the active force, just what your previous guest has said, all of those efforts I felt had been -- had undermined our cause.
ZAHN: But, Mr. Burkett...
BURKETT: I think it was the action.
(CROSSTALK)
ZAHN: Let me just ask you this. You no doubt have heard the criticism coming your way. The White House, or particularly Scott McClellan has called your charges absolutely ridiculous. Joe Allbaugh, the man you apparently overheard talking, has denied ever having the conversation you talked about and has denied any record dumping at all.
BURKETT: Ms. Zahn, I'm not going to get in the mud.
The power of the collective FReepers is asounding!
It is amazing to watch clues, evidence and ideas be presented and take shape here.
Some are good. Some are faulty. By FReepers inter-acting, and enforcing or challenging ideas and "facts", a "true" picture develops.
At the end we have a reasonable consensus (at least for most).
And the on-going thinking is public. Amazing!
If it proves to be true that the forged documents went from this individual directly to CBS, would it not also be strong evidence that the Kerry Campaign and DNC were not guilty of the offense.
