Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS News Concludes It Was Misled on National Guard Memos, Network Officials Say
New York Times ^ | 9/20/04 | Jim Rutenberg

Posted on 09/19/2004 9:40:13 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 521-530 next last

1 posted on 09/19/2004 9:40:13 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Gee Im so glad they are being careful so they dont get the story wrong


I am not a GOP Lawyer


2 posted on 09/19/2004 9:42:04 PM PDT by woofie (This document was generated in 2004 by a computer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Their defense is stupidity?
3 posted on 09/19/2004 9:42:16 PM PDT by Savage Beast (The internet is the newspaper of record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Here we go folks....we knew this was gonna happen!


4 posted on 09/19/2004 9:43:21 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

"Those officials, who asked not to be identified, said CBS News would most likely make an announcement as early as today that it had been deceived about the documents' origins, and that it was mounting an intensive news investigation of where they came from."

Maybe they should start by asking Danny Boy.


5 posted on 09/19/2004 9:43:31 PM PDT by Screaming Eagle Red Leg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
There's a word for people like those at CBS: "Twits"
6 posted on 09/19/2004 9:43:51 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

CBS was misled, or Rather chose to use material he knew to be fradulent in order to damage the President? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....


7 posted on 09/19/2004 9:44:00 PM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Those officials, who asked not to be identified, said CBS News would most likely make an announcement as early as today that it had been deceived about the documents' origins, and that it was mounting an intensive news investigation of where they came from.

First, what cowards, and second, it sure took that clown outfit CBS long enough to figure out what the rest of the world knew a week ago.

8 posted on 09/19/2004 9:44:37 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Who gives a rats ass what CBS news thinks about anything, anymore.
They will never regain credibility, if they ever had it.


9 posted on 09/19/2004 9:44:45 PM PDT by MisterRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

This is going to be big, big, big- much bigger than Jayson Blair. Dan Rather didn't "burn down his master's house," he brought it down w/ a nuclear bomb. So long, CBS news.


10 posted on 09/19/2004 9:45:10 PM PDT by scottybk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Here is some free advice for Mapes and Rather -- you might want to think about hiring a good lawyer.


11 posted on 09/19/2004 9:45:24 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"But these people cautioned that CBS News could still pull back from an announcement."

Don't listen to 'em captain Dan. That great white whale is right there in front of you. Throw the harpoon now captain Dan, throw it!

Tune next week kiddies for stirring stories of Dan Quixote!

12 posted on 09/19/2004 9:45:57 PM PDT by Enterprise (The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
... but the story is correct. We know, because Buckhead is a GOP lawyer. We only used the documents to dramatize the point.
13 posted on 09/19/2004 9:46:00 PM PDT by Henchman (Vote Communist - elect Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I thought that "60 Minutes" had incredible, amazing, bulletproof fact checking resources far beyond the understanding of mere mortals. How can this be?
14 posted on 09/19/2004 9:46:05 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oolatec
WUO WAS THE SOURCE?????????
15 posted on 09/19/2004 9:46:08 PM PDT by Viet-Boat-Rider (((KERRY IS A NARCISSISTIC LIAR, GOLDBRICKER, AND TRAITOR!)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Sandy Genelius, a network spokeswoman, said last week, "We are confident about the chain of custody; we're confident in how we secured the documents.''

You moron. You flaming idiot. This is like being confident that you have an absolutely, utterly, completely accurate map of Chicago - except the problem is that you're in Miami. Who gives a rip about their chain of custody? THE DOCUMENTS ARE FAKE.

CBS would do well to remember the #1 lesson of Watergate - the coverup is ALWAYS worse than the crime. Always. Every single time.

Fess up, throw yourselves on the mercy of the American people, and hope for the best.

16 posted on 09/19/2004 9:46:28 PM PDT by Terabitten (Live as a bastion of freedom and democracy in the midst of the heart of darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Ever since the ratings information was published, this was the invevitable result. When CBS news lost to all its regular competition AND to re-runs of the Simpsons, etc., Rather was toast. For Rather it was all about power and ideology; for the bosses, it is a tad about honest journalism but mostly and primarily about money. No ratings, no revenues; no revenues, good-bye Dan.


17 posted on 09/19/2004 9:47:06 PM PDT by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; devolve; PhilDragoo; Smartass

PING


18 posted on 09/19/2004 9:47:11 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

As I said in another thread, I originally bought the line that Rather was duped and did not use forged docs intentionally. Now, with the mountain of evidence we have seen in the last 10 days, much of it brought to Rather's and CBS's attention PRIOR to their airing the docs, leads me to believe that Rather knew the docs were forged and yet still used them. If Rather had this quantity and quality of evidence against Bush, he conclude the worst. In fact, he did!


19 posted on 09/19/2004 9:47:19 PM PDT by Screaming Eagle Red Leg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
They used documents their own experts said were forgeries to influence a Presidential election but they were "MISLED"? I got your "MISLED" right here SeeBS!
20 posted on 09/19/2004 9:47:21 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 521-530 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson