Posted on 09/28/2004 11:12:08 AM PDT by phil_will1
In a worrisome trend bound to confront the winner of November's presidential election, U.S. multinational corporations increasingly are shifting more of their global profits to such tax havens as Ireland, Bermuda and Luxembourg.
The practice promises to accelerate the nation's shrinking corporate tax base and risk the loss of billions in federal tax dollars. Combined with the recent flurry of federal tax cuts for U.S. households, the decline of corporate taxes raises a big question.
How will the federal government, already facing a hefty deficit, fund itself and its many obligations in the coming years?
The alarm over the corporate profit flight to overseas tax havens was sounded in a new analysis by Martin A. Sullivan, a former official with the U.S. Treasury Department and ex-congressional staffer on the Joint Committee on Taxation, in the Sept. 13 issue of the publication Tax Notes, the so-called bible of the tax industry.
"There has always been a problem from the U.S. government point of view with shifting profits out of the United States and other high-tax countries into tax havens," Sullivan said in an interview. "What struck me was the dramatic change that I saw in the 2002 data" - the latest available.
According to Sullivan's analysis, profits of foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations in 18 tax havens soared from $88-billion in 1999 to $149-billion in 2002. That means 58 percent of U.S. multinationals' total foreign profits now sit in tax havens. That figure far exceeds the share of economic activity that these corporations conduct in those low-tax countries.
Translation? On paper, U.S. multinational corporations are cramming more and more worldwide profits into countries with the cheapest tax rates, in the process slashing what they owe in taxes back in the United States. Sullivan says the issue will become more acute for federal policymakers and the next president - be it George W. Bush or John Kerry.
"The winner almost surely will have to grapple with an eroding corporate tax base and, in turn, the potential loss of billions of dollars to federal coffers," Sullivan wrote.
Nor are dwindling tax dollars the only issue. As long as corporations can preserve so much more of their profits overseas, then those companies are far more likely to expand and hire more employees outside the United States. That means national tax strategies - not just wage scales - are becoming a bigger factor in the overseas outsourcing of U.S. jobs.
Sullivan's analysis, which compares 2002 and 1999 data, shows Ireland soared to the top of the list of tax-haven profits, reporting $26.8-billion in before-tax profits from U.S. multinationals. Ireland, which ranked No. 4 in 1999, has an effective tax rate of just 8 percent.
Bermuda, with a 2 percent effective tax rate, ranked No. 2 in 2002 by attracting $25.2-billion, a tripling of pretax profits. The other fastest-growing tax havens include Luxembourg (1 percent effective tax rate) and Singapore (11 percent effective tax rate).
The profit shift is no fluke. Sullivan notes that profits generated by foreign subsidiaries in large industrial countries where U.S. companies conducted most of their overseas business have fallen sharply. And such countries as Denmark, Belgium and New Zealand have substantially dropped their effective tax rates. In the process, they may have reignited a competition among some countries to see how low their tax rates can go.
The United States taxes corporate profits at 35 percent.
Not that avoiding corporate taxes is that easy.
Traditionally, the United States taxes corporations on their profits, no matter where they are produced. If a foreign country taxes foreign profits, then this country generally reduces its own tax on the same profits, dollar for dollar, top avoid double-taxing the corporation.
But there's a catch. Profits generated overseas by U.S. corporations are not subject to U.S. taxes until the money is paid as a dividend to the U.S. parent. As long as that payment is deferred, then there is no U.S. tax. Sullivan says U.S. corporations increasingly will permanently defer taxes by reinvesting those foreign profits in low-tax countries.
That's not supposed to happen. Sullivan says an aggressive combination of new laws, regulations, court decisions, lobbying and sharp practices by tax lawyers have "severely diminished" the ability of the United States to track and tax deferred overseas profits. And that trend, Sullivan adds, has only made more attractive the mad corporate dash to stash profits in tax havens.
"It's a big mess," Sullivan concedes.
Kerry has proposed ending tax breaks that encourage companies to move jobs overseas by closing loopholes and eliminating the ability of companies to defer paying U.S. taxes on foreign income. He would also cut the corporate tax rate by 5 percent.
Perhaps the United States does not want to tax its corporations the old fashioned way. That's fine, Sullivan asserts, but what's the alternative? One possibility tossed around in tax circles is the VAT, or value-added tax. That's a consumption tax, popular in Europe, on a product levied at each stage of production and based on the value added to the product at each stage.
Sorry to drag you through even a light treatment of the notoriously dense world of corporate taxation. But there's a red flag waving here.
Suffice to say, U.S. multinationals are getting ever bigger and successfully paying a smaller and smaller percentage of their profits to the U.S. government.
At the same time, the federal government is on a tear trying to outdo itself with tax cuts to U.S. households. It sure sounds great - in the short run. But it does not take a Houdini to realize a debt-laden country can't escape big bills coming due by slapping even more of them on the nation's credit card.
tax reform bump
You mean moving the tax burden entirely from corporations to Joe Sixpack ?
If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.
John Linder in the House & Saxby Chambliss Senate, offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and payroll taxes outright, and provide a IRS free replacement in the form of a retail sales tax:
H.R.25, S.1493
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.Refer for additional information: http://www.fairtax.org & http://www.salestax.org
www.fairtax.org
get involved
Uh...cut spending?
[Pause for laughter.]
No, I'm serious.
[Pause for laughter.]
I'm really serious.
[Sound of crickets chirping.]
OK, never mind.
U.S. multinational corporations increasingly are shifting more of their global profits to such tax havens as Ireland, Bermuda and Luxembourg.
Yep, so lets reverse that trend and bring them here:
Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee,
Rep. Bill Archer (R-TX)
August 12, 1996
- "A recent survey was done, in Europe and Japan, of the major corporations and I was astounded at the results. They were asked, 'If the US abolished its income tax and went to a sales tax, would that have any impact on your decisions?' Eighty percent of the corporations said they would build their factories in the United States of America. Twenty percent said they would move their international headquarters to the United States of America."
Corporations do not pay taxes. They merely collect them from their customers.
Economics 101: Learn it, Live it, Love it.
You mean moving the tax burden entirely from corporations to Joe Sixpack ?
Joe sixpack is paying those taxes everytime he buys anything at all. Where do you think the money comes from to pay business taxes, from under some mattress?
DO YOU PAY YOUR INCOME TAX
AT THE SUPERMARKET?
by D. Sherman Cox J.D. L.L.M. Taxation
Never thought of Ireland as a tax haven. Now I finally understand this.
"Clinton tees up his dream flat in Ireland
By Thomas Harding, Ireland Correspondent
(Filed: 11/07/2003)
Bill Clinton yesterday united his two loves, Ireland and golf, by buying a two-bedroom apartment that overlooks a Ryder Cup venue."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F07%2F11%2Fnclin11.xml
Taxes are high because people want the gov't to do and provide more and more. I don't blame politicians anymore, I blame the voters.
I've got news for you, CORPORATIONS DO NOT PAY TAXES. The consumer's of their products pay the tax - it's just hidden in price. If you don't believe me, take an accounting class.
I had a discussion a long time ago that basicly said tax revenue for the federal government should be pegged to 1.5 times the current state retail sales tax.
It made for an interesting discussions for several hours about how California would either lower it's sales tax or that states would then compete against each other for business by lowering sales rates.
We even kicked around the possibility of one state eliminating the sales tax and only relying on property taxes and what that would do.
I must admit it was an interesting mental exercise.
Oh, I see. So if corporate taxes were abolished then prices across the board will come down because corporations no longer have to pay taxes ?
Like hell they would.
I had a discussion a long time ago that basicly said tax revenue for the federal government should be pegged to 1.5 times the current state retail sales tax.
In terms of total effective tax rates the current ratio of federal vs state looks to be about 1.8, after the Bush tax cuts:
|
Total Effective Tax Rates by Level of Government |
|||
| Year | Federal | State | Total |
| 2000 | 23.1% | 10.4% | 33.5% |
| 2001 | 22.2% | 10.5% | 33.7% |
| 2002 1 | 19.7% | 10.2% | 29.2% |
| 2003 2 | 18.5% | 10.1% | 28.6% |
| 2004 3 | 17.9% | 10.0% | 27.9% |
| 1 Economic Growth and Tax Reform Reconciliation Act of 2001 2 The Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002 3 Job Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 Sources: Office of Management and Budget; Internal Revenue Service; Congressional Research Service; National Bureau of Economic Research; Treasury Department; and Tax Foundation calculations. |
|||
Cutting the fat isn't enough. We have to cut the meat.
So if corporate taxes were abolished then prices across the board will come down because corporations no longer have to pay taxes ?
Like hell they would.
Corporations are interested in increasing profits, not prices.
The first business to lower prices to gather more marketshare from those that figure to gain a windfall will have embarassingly high profits.
Non-competitive prices just mean less profits for those holding out with the higher prices, not more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.