Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2004 12:23:03 PM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: crushelits

This is why Nader needs to be added to the debates immediately!


2 posted on 10/01/2004 12:25:27 PM PDT by LongsforReagan (Democrats =Girly Men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

No difference? How about tax cuts? Supreme Court nominees? That's just two examples of many.


3 posted on 10/01/2004 12:25:37 PM PDT by RockinRight (W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

I don't even have to read the article, and I already know it's crap.


4 posted on 10/01/2004 12:25:55 PM PDT by LtKerst (Lt Kerst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

It was rather dull, watching two guys argue about how to best implement the same bad idea.


5 posted on 10/01/2004 12:27:24 PM PDT by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

How does crap like this get in a business magazine? Slow financial day?


6 posted on 10/01/2004 12:28:42 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

you can find "democrat" in the dictionary. right between "Demagogue" and "demon"


7 posted on 10/01/2004 12:28:54 PM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits
Bush believes in the sanctity of life. Kerry is a big fan of partial birth abortions.

Bush was not afraid to make the difficult decision to send troops to Iraq. Kerry is not afraid of being manscaped just about every damn afternoon.

Bush believes that we, the people, should be allowed to keep some of our hard earned money. Kerry wants to see 20% of America financially supporting the other 80% of America.

I could go on but I think you get what I'm saying. They're not exactly twins, are they?

10 posted on 10/01/2004 12:29:58 PM PDT by grellis (Quick, someone post a Python graphic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits
Someone in the media can be counted on to come out with an article along the lines in every election, if it looks like the democrat is going to lose.

(steely)

12 posted on 10/01/2004 12:30:33 PM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

If that's all Ciro Scotti looks at, it no wonder he sounds like and is such an idiot. I bet he thinks his article was cute, you know, tongue-in-cheek. All it does is emphasise his stupidity - and that's from either viewpoint (dem or pub). That article was definitely a piece of crap.


14 posted on 10/01/2004 12:32:07 PM PDT by no more apples (God Bless our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

I read the article now I Know for sure it's crap.

Businessweek.com = Liberalcrap.com

Scotti would say the Pope and Charles Manson were the same because,
1. they are both Men
2. they were born on the same planet
3. they both breathe air and walk upright
4. they both have Christian Names

etc. ect. etc. CRAP.


15 posted on 10/01/2004 12:32:33 PM PDT by LtKerst (Lt Kerst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

I read the article now I Know for sure it's crap.

Businessweek.com = Liberalcrap.com

Scotti would say the Pope and Charles Manson were the same because,
1. they are both Men
2. they were born on the same planet
3. they both breathe air and walk upright
4. they both have Christian Names

etc. ect. etc. CRAP.


19 posted on 10/01/2004 12:34:02 PM PDT by LtKerst (Lt Kerst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

For me the highlight of the evening was when Lehrer quizzed both candidates about America's border policy.


20 posted on 10/01/2004 12:34:07 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits
I filed a case concerning the participation of both Gene McCarthy and Lester Maddox in the Presidential Debates of 1976. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, with only Benjamin Hooks, later to become President of the NAACP and then an FCC Commissioner, accepted our position that any candidate on enough ballots to be elected, should participate in debates. So that aspect of this article I thoroughly agree with.

However, I deeply resent the first part of his article that in essence says that wealthy Yalies with graduate degrees should be disqualified from becoming President. I don't object when the voters, if asked, decide that I should never be President. But I resent it when an Editor for Business Week unilaterally condemns me to that fate.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "And the Debate Winner is -- Lemony Snicket"

If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.

21 posted on 10/01/2004 12:34:42 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

uh . . .

unimpressed with the article, typical of the naderites. That's OK, though. Naderites tend to overgeneralize a point to show their "uniqueness". I still support "W".


26 posted on 10/01/2004 12:53:19 PM PDT by Heinz 57 (Yes I'm Mixed Breed but not mixed up. I am all AMERICAN and proud of it. God, I love this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson